Pahalgam Islamic Terror Attack

jor_se_bolo_pkmkb said:
Cancelling IWT won't be nothing. It will be a big blow to the porkies, and if we cancel it right now we have the optics and diplomacy in our favour.

Cancel IWT as step 1 and then do the kinetic responses. Perfect opportunity to get rid of this useless treaty.
Click to expand...
Cancelling IWT is must, it will force porkies to attack.
Defending against the terrorists in our own territory will be lot easier than invading.
 
Kapil said:
I have been lurking on DFI and BR for ages and the quality of debates seriously....

U folks have managed to break my no-response pratigya with sheer awesomeness.

GD Bakshi sir is asking the right questions -
1. Who suggested shrinking of army?
2. Who would suggest Agonyveer?
3. Why is the border still leaky? Jetpack se lekar Laser tak sab khareed rakkha hai, but still?
4. Who failed - intelligence, BSF, IA, Local Police? All? What was the action taken on officials after Pathankot, Raesi etc.
5. Wht was Raesi suppressed from news/no response given?
6. When are we going to start questioning Motu and Kadi Ninda for consistent underperformance? I mean Jammu, Manipur?
7. How did we shape up Army, Navy, Airforce after Balakot and Galwan? It's one thing to talk about being Vishwaguru and another to demonstrate it. Are we somehow more prepared now to go kinetic?
8. Economically, how are we after 2019? Are we an economic superpower or is our economy cracking like a 20year old charpoy? Will economic heft allow us to walk over Napak while getting bruises of our own?
Click to expand...
only reason i vote for 56 is napak.
even that looks moot now.
 
shade2 said:

View: https://x.com/SJha1618/status/1914952207826575548



An overwhelming and all directions response is necessary.

No small surgical strikes or Balakot style bombings.

Sindh, Balochistan, Punjab all must be on the menu.
DHAs and Papa Johns and Chaddi and Ice Cream factories, anything owned by Fauji Foundation.
Click to expand...

As I always say for india economic growth is priority.
I see overall larger picture with china getting taxed to 250% many will be moving out to india. It's in no interest of china to see a stronger india and this is a golden opportunity to grasp.
The only reason as sjha said pak-chinkoms initiated this is to get india into a larger war and sabotage the overall growth chapter which could have started. They want us to get into war very badly that's there priority does that mean we shouldn't retaliate NO
We should but not such a way that it would instigate a larger war if they do instigate they we should go full blown onto them.

The most survivable way through this mess is a naval retaliatory strike on there ships which means we won't be targeting pakistani land sar zameen.
Sink multiple ships the parity between Indian Navy & pak navy is huge. And iaf can provide umbrella agains paf.
Strike there ships sink them. After which put a naval blockade and starve them & there economy.
Every here is taking abt retaliation no one's has idea abt end game how will this end ? We should try making it in our favour. For that it's must we don't incur losses be it of life, economic, infra etc etc.

If they retaliate ln full blown manner (multi domain)via missile on our land hit there critical infra destroy shipyards destroy those subs under construction destroy all ports except the gwadar. As I said earlier then we should go full blown as well after all they getting into position for full fledged war we cant keep the peace to preserve prosperity.

But at the end pakistan would have suffered much more and we would have also lost some years of development and prosperity.
Pakistan has nothing to loose if they loose 100x more still what damage our economic growth will face would be enormous and that's what china wants. The opportunities would have already flown to other countries by then.

We should retaliate not into paki land but straight away take out there ships we overpower them there.

Or the another much peacefull option would be begging with naval blockade without initiating any attack on pns and once they initiate we should too with keeping it limited to navy only. Preferably only ship should be target but as I said once they cross the line we should engage too. Beginning with naval infra ports and much stronger blockade for years to come.
This way we can ensure least damage to us.
Unless and until we don't face war at borders it should be fine.
Viper316 said:
Ceasefire fire violation by paxtan followed by coward terrorist attack. Terroristan provoking us for a battle

View: https://x.com/FromGursimran/status/1914862347858087964?t=5duYS9Np1ZpoSDyzdB8MTg&s=19
Click to expand...

They want escalation that's clear
eastern_bhartiya said:
What about SRBMs like pralay, these need to used to used to destroy stuff like skardu, further paki Cities need to Targeted, fuck muh escalation, fuck international law nonsense. If it's gonna be a nuclear war so be it.

Karachi needs to be Targetted by navy, if modi doesn't response, it will end his political career. He will lose all his image. Pulwama was attack on forces, this was a attack on unarmed civilians.
Click to expand...
No naval operation/blockade is much better choice if done peaceful preferably without launching missiles starving them would the best for us as we wouldn't suffer much losses. If any misadventures done by them we should start taking down there ships.

Naval Blockade(if misadventures done)>sink pak ships(another misadventures done into our land)>take one ports>if they dont stop Go engage in multi domain (paf,pa) then go full blown.
@mist_consecutive what is you're take on this you're the only one who talked abt the end game of this matter. We should do our best to bring end in our favour it's not worth it even if we do 100x more damage compared to us. We shall keep this conflict away from borders. Unless untill they chooses not to
Decahex said:
Look man, the point is simple. IAF even if it's better than PAF doesn't have the same extent of advantage that the IN has over PN. If IAF>PAF, IA>>PA then IN>>>>>>PN.
Click to expand...
Completely agreed retaliation should only come from naval side with preferably naval blockade. Along with fighter support to them from iaf side.
 
Last edited:
MasterChief said:
Deterring Pakistan Army comes first. I know it's hard to do, as compared to beating up local sullas, to compensate for our impotence.
Without deterring Pakistan Army, even the military personnel and Hindus who you settle down in Kashmir, will be killed and targeted by Pak Army proxies..
Click to expand...
To deter pork army we need 4 more years till tejas and awacs procurement is complete.
Till that time we can surround trashmir and pick out porkies trash one by one. Then same tactics can be applied to waste bengal
 
samsaptaka said:
Hindus should learn that kashmiri Muslims only want hindu money from tourism but no Hindu settlers . Still if you want to go there and fund your own destruction then its pretty pathetic.
Click to expand...
its a delicate balance actually.
strong local ekaanamee is needed to keep trashmeer yoothias from "going wayward"
strong tourism is needed to prop up a semblance of ekaaneek activity there.
semblance of peace is to be maintained to show that aborogation was worth the effort.

so ...
 
Two hindu killers in a single frame. The lack of accountability is astounding to me. Any shameless person would have atleast apologised by now if not resign but vishwalodu and his chela are besharam enough to continue.


View: https://x.com/castepatroller/status/1914740920177557653?s=46

Both of them intentionally fooled hindus with a false sense of safety and led themto the slaughter house. Any self respecting nation would have booted this laser eyed fool by now.
 
RocketMan said:
My expertise in Microbiology suggests a targeted virus can be genetically modified to be hyper lethal & self limiting
Click to expand...
Can you design a lethal virus which will only infect circumcised men ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Azaad
  • Sticky
Islamic Extremism in India : News , Discussions & Updates.
33 34 35
Replies
693
Views
21K
Adibot
Adibot

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Share this Site

Back
Top