- Joined
- Jun 5, 2025
- Messages
- 24
- Likes
- 91

They are useless, cannon fodder. Real enemy is Pakistani military. That is the head of the snake.but why can't we bring these known killers to justice
You have to crush them for a lasting impact
They are useless, cannon fodder. Real enemy is Pakistani military. That is the head of the snake.but why can't we bring these known killers to justice
This is the question that bothers me as wellFirst of all, I want to say I’m extremely proud of our armed forces for the successful execution of Operation Sindoor. It was a bold and decisive move that not only showed Pakistan its place but also demonstrated India's strength and strategic capability on the global stage.
But amidst this pride, I’m still left with a burning question — why have the terrorists responsible for the Pahalgam massacre not been eliminated or captured yet? We have their names, their origins, even their roles:
Despite sketches, demolitions, and public outrage — not one of them has been neutralized. It is deeply frustrating and heartbreaking that months after such a horrific attack, the perpetrators continue to roam free.
- Hashim Musa – Pakistan (ex-para SF)
- Ali Bhai (Talha) – Pakistan, Shooter/infiltrator
- Adil Hussain Thoker – Anantnag
- Asif Sheikh (Fauji) – Pulwama
- Saifullah Kasuri – Pakistan (LeT handler), Mastermind
We can strike deep into enemy territory, but why can't we bring these known killers to justice?
Yes I know but, With 183 Tejas Mk1A jets, Indian Air Force will be capable of striking Pakistani ground targets with air-launched BrahMos missiles and various other indigenous weapons. However, to maintain superiority in air-to-air combat, the IAF urgently needs a fifth-generation fighter and a clear beyond-visual-range (BVR) advantage over Pakistan.Tejas will carry an even smallerwarhead . It's just not a high damage weapon.
As an example , the Tomohawk has a bigger warhead and the Americans use hundreds of them for SEAD and to disable airbases. We can't afford to use hundreds of brahmos.
The military knows that which is why they asked for the Prahaar.
There was subsequent news that the initial suspects were different than the actual perpetrators based on information from arrested OGWs, but that also doesn’t have any official confirmation.First of all, I want to say I’m extremely proud of our armed forces for the successful execution of Operation Sindoor. It was a bold and decisive move that not only showed Pakistan its place but also demonstrated India's strength and strategic capability on the global stage.
But amidst this pride, I’m still left with a burning question — why have the terrorists responsible for the Pahalgam massacre not been eliminated or captured yet? We have their names, their origins, even their roles:
Despite sketches, demolitions, and public outrage — not one of them has been neutralized. It is deeply frustrating and heartbreaking that months after such a horrific attack, the perpetrators continue to roam free.
- Hashim Musa – Pakistan (ex-para SF)
- Ali Bhai (Talha) – Pakistan, Shooter/infiltrator
- Adil Hussain Thoker – Anantnag
- Asif Sheikh (Fauji) – Pulwama
- Saifullah Kasuri – Pakistan (LeT handler), Mastermind
We can strike deep into enemy territory, but why can't we bring these known killers to justice?
Crushing them = flattening their hierarchical pyramid. Flattening the pyramid creates enough competition from lower levels who then descend into chaos with infighting. That's why it was a smart move to target so close to GHQ pindi during OS.They are useless, cannon fodder. Real enemy is Pakistani military. That is the head of the snake.
You have to crush them for a lasting impact
Yes, you are right. That is why decision has been taken to build 7.5 bunker buster and mount it on Agni or any other missile.Crushing them = flattening their hierarchical pyramid. Flattening the pyramid creates enough competition from lower levels who then descend into chaos with infighting. That's why it was a smart move to target so close to GHQ pindi during OS.
While Pakistanis have an upper hand with the Americans and Chinese backing them in the field of information warfare (US is damn good at it as we saw initially in the Ukraine-Russia Conflict), we will eventually gain an upper hand.
If OS is any indicator, I seriously believe that standoff warfare is going to be the future format of combat. I don't see columns of Arjuns and T-90s storming into Pakistan to raze them. It will be more like thousands of Nirbhays, LORAs, BrahMos and Harops, raining down on specific coordinates.
This will also prompt the Pakistanis to build underground bunkers to secure their military commands. The only way we can catch them off-guard in the future is to ensure that we keep them distracted and then suddenly launch a strike.
Tejas will carry an even smallerwarhead . It's just not a high damage weapon.
As an example , the Tomohawk has a bigger warhead and the Americans use hundreds of them for SEAD and to disable airbases. We can't afford to use hundreds of brahmos.
The military knows that which is why they asked for the Prahaar.
Sharing an analysis on the failure of HQ-9BE Surface to Air Missile system of the Pakistan Air Force in preventing attack on the Nur Khan Air Base. Even though a battery was based at the Air Base, and it had been bought with a special radar package to take on ballistic missiles and other such threats.
View: https://youtu.be/ZaksLDWYpdo?si=wA2hu3gh_mWeyblt
That's not how it works . It can hit as hard as you want if there is not a big enough warhead , it doesn't do as much as a Tomahawk .has almost 4-5 times more energy generated at impact than Tomahawk.
Meaning americans require around 5 Tomahawks for same impact as India requires oneand we are comfortably sitting at Ten Thousand
stockpile so you can bet we can afford them.
That's not how it works . It can hit as hard as you want if there is not a big enough warhead , it doesn't do as much as a Tomahawk .
ye, but lrlacm should be the bread and butterhas almost 4-5 times more energy generated at impact than Tomahawk.
Meaning americans require around 5 Tomahawks for same impact as India requires oneand we are comfortably sitting at Ten Thousand
stockpile so you can bet we can afford them.
ye, but lrlacm should be the bread and butter
i hope they are bought in the thousands. does any one have an idea what the unit cost of the lrlacm would be
Hypersonic Cruise Missile will be much better for chinis, Subsonics I dont see survive much in longer flights.choyna
Drdo SAAW( smart anti air Field weapon) range 100km, warhead 80kg, total weight 125kg.Hence we need a efficient Mass Payload delivery Mechanism. That is as much less MTOW of the Projectile as possible for given payload for example 100kg or 500kg Warhead.
In absence of large scale Air Force, our pivot should be towards Missiles. In such scenario Long Range LACM andare too costly to project mass on enemy. One of the most disadvantageous position Pakistan has is in regarding India- its geography. Every base is within atmost 300-400km or so from our border. MLRS won't reach that kind of range and would need full fledged Missile which need to be atleast 2 to 3-Ton.
What I think is best way to deliver mass is Winged Glide Bomb paired to Rocket.
View attachment 42928
This GL-SDB has a range of 150-Km with just max weight of 270-Kg but with 100-Kg warhead. Imagine a JSOW which has 500-Kg warhead but paired with a 370-mm rocket(JSOW has diameter of 330mm). It would easily give a range of 300 to 400-Km.
Moreover these are very stealthy, silent and doesn't emit any IR Signature to shoot them down.
View attachment 42930
Hypersonic for high value targets, and airdefense systems, once the air defense network of a limited area has been degraded, spam large no. cheaper subsonic Long Range cruise missiles for targets in that limited area .Hypersonic Cruise Missile will be much better for chinis, Subsonics I dont see survive much in longer flights.
Supersonic flight at 100 meters or less altitude for "8 minutes" through "hilly terrain".accelerates to supersonic speed at low altitude (100 meters or less) through hilly terrain for a 8-minute burst
Why did it go supersonic again? Near the base?once its closer to base it’s diverted to near the Panjab border and goes supersonic again at 100 meters or so
Supersonic flight at 100 meters or less altitude for "8 minutes" through "hilly terrain".
Highly unrealistic.
Why did it go supersonic again? Near the base?
OK it's math based, but why did you assume all this happened? That pilots did took it beyond it's structural limits?Diverted towards other area, supersonic 100 meters not required as per radar evasion but pushing the airframe out of its structural limits as per maths basically.
I say for this scenario pilot took the Rafale beyond whatever sales pitch dasault provided to IAF
Just a reminder this is a scenario based on math
Only way my theory can be confirmed by folks living near the supersonic low altitude flight path from ambala to j&k , if ppl heard deafening thundering beyond 1 min it so its a supersonic flight with 100 meter or less low flying