- Joined
- Jun 30, 2024
- Messages
- 967
- Likes
- 3,255
Has same vibe as Archer NG is Heron mk2 anyway seems like NG is as good as dead now.
Mk2 was supposed to be developed by DRDO and L&T Right?Nag missile about to hit the representative target tank.
View attachment 8664
Namica mk2.
View attachment 8666
Amphibious trials.
View attachment 8667
This is Mk.3 actually with 4 tubes. Wait for Mk.4, it'll have one guy riding on the top with a singular launcher.
BC mk this MK that this shit is so confusing so what changes does mk2 has compared to mk1This is Mk.3 actually with 4 tubes. Wait for Mk.4, it'll have one guy riding on the top with a singular launcher.
Less ready to launch missilesBC mk this MK that this shit is so confusing so what changes does mk2 has compared to mk1
Because there was no long term plan to have an unified air-defence system with multiple missiles and every project happened in kind of an ad-hoc basis. After this whole CAATSA thing with S-400 and then the subsequent suboptimal performance of it made us to work on a replacement.
> Mobile SAMs like OSA would get replaced by QRSAM
> Akash and Akash-P would get replaced by Kusha M1
> Barak-8/MRSAM/LRSAM would get replaced by Kusha M1. As I told yesterday, we can't export them. You can check on Bharat Dynamic Limited website how everything is listed for export, except this.
> Whatever work we have done on Akash-NG and LRSAM would now culminate into Kusha M1. Akash-NG was always supposed to be an Indian replacement for Barak-8/MRSAM.
> S-400's lower tier missiles would get replaced by Kusha M2 and Kusha M3.
> S-400's upper tier ABM missiles would get replaced by AAD/PAD/AD-1/AD-2
So if everything goes as planned then you'd have just three SAM systems. (Not counting MANPADS)
1. QRSAM; short range mobile
2. Kusha; medium to long with limited ABM capabilities
3. AD series; dedicated ABM system
View attachment 8738
- <10km - VSHORAD (IA, IN?)
View attachment 8737
- 30km - mobile QRSAM (IA)
View attachment 8740
- 30km - static RF-Seeker Akash Prime (IAF, maybe replaced by)...
View attachment 8735
- 75km - Dual pulse, multifunctional radar, canisterised & mobile Akash NG (IA & IAF)
View attachment 8741
- 100KM - land based Barak8 MRSAM (IA, IAF, IN)
View attachment 8736
- 100km LOBL-LOAL capable VL-SRSAM Naval Astra (IN)
View attachment 8734
- 150km - naval Barak8 LRSAM (IN, being developed into XRSAM)
- 400km - S-400 (IA, to be replaced by)...
- 150 km, 250 km and 350 km - XRSAM Kusha Projects with 2way data link & TVC
- BMD
• VSHORADView attachment 8738
- <10km - VSHORAD (IA, IN?)
View attachment 8737
- 30km - mobile QRSAM (IA)
- 30km - static Akash Prime (IAF, maybe replaced by)...
View attachment 8735
- 75km - Dual pulse, multifunctional radar Akash NG (IA & IAF)
View attachment 8736
- 100KM - land based Barak8 MRSAM (IA, IAF)
- 100km LOBL-LOAL capable VL-SRSAM Naval Astra (IN)
View attachment 8734
- 150km - naval Barak8 LRSAM (IN)
- S-400 & BMD (IA, to be replaced by)...
- XRSAM Kusha Projects with 2way data link & tvc
Nah, VLSRSAM will be in 45-50 km range at best, maybe 60-65 if they make a version out of Astra Mk2.
This is Mk.3 actually with 4 tubes. Wait for Mk.4, it'll have one guy riding on the top with a singular launcher.
(Spoiler) Next is 2 ...
> you take a standard BMP-2 with 30mm 2A42 auto-cannon and twin ATGM launchersFair... You want just some ATGM capabilities on a APC platform.
For a dedicated missile platform you got attack-helos & drones, or a pick-up can take that many missiles. For a tracked platform, they might want cannon with ATGM as primary.View attachment 8899