- Joined
- Jul 1, 2024
- Messages
- 377
- Likes
- 2,595
Guided pinaka is not made for missile level precise strike.i am referring to the guided pinaka itself. the stated CEP is 60m, which is much higher than other guided MLRS out there
Time for drdo to enter into ai ops in social media with pro indian content across languages. HINDUISM IS A SHIELD FOR INDIAN SECURITY.
View: https://x.com/iitbombay/status/1928370268528951737?t=lIGf7WA4KzMv1hXtq7Z6rg&s=19
Has anything been done to improve the accuracy of Pinakas? For 2025, the quoted accuracy of (~1%) seems abysmal. Hard to use this for any form of precision strikes
If you are talking use case then yes a Shaurya QBM technically ticks all the boxes for for a HCM.HCM are hyped due to
1, hypersonic speed.
2, fly at 20-50km at atmosphere, so later detection than ballistic missiles many that leave the atmosphere.
3, fly in a depressed/straight and unpredictable path, instead of any form of ballistic/parabolic trajectory.
These things are what make the interception of HCM so difficult and hype them up so much.
Shaurya fulfills all three points I made.
So shaurya is not a quasi "ballistic" missile in depressed trajectory mode, because in this mode it doesn't fly in ballistic trajectory at all, it's flight trajectory looks most similar to flight trajectory of HCM.
Though Method of propulsion, way of cooling is different than what we associate with traditional HCM.
While HCM's have become synonymous with scramjet tech, but ultimately its a method of propulsion, If you can use another method of propulsion( rocket powered) to achieve similar flight trajectory at similar altitude at hypersonic speed then it's a HCM, albit rocket propulsion is lot less efficient than airbreathing scramjet, hence lot more fuel needed hence increase in weight.
Though there are other benifits, like bigger warhead, maneuverability not limited by needing to maintain stable airflow to scramjet/ramjet etc, ability to use different flight trajectory( depressed like hcm, mix of both, quasi ballistic), lot cheaper and less technologically complex to make.
Ultimately the HC in HCM, hypersonic cruise Is about cruising at hypersonic speeds, not about what propulsion method is used to cruise at hypersonic speeds.
For example, Russia has kh32 higher supersonic/near hypersonic( maz speed mach4.6) air launched "cruise" missile, and it's ",rocket powered".
Are you seriously expecting unguided rockets whose entire objective is to vapourise anything & everything in a specified area to have the accuracy of a sniper rifle?Has anything been done to improve the accuracy of Pinakas? For 2025, the quoted accuracy of (~1%) seems abysmal. Hard to use this for any form of precision strikes
The 120km max range pinaka mk3 is expected to have cep<10m, so missile like on point precision strike is possible.Being an Aerial Deinal Weapon, I don't think Army wants this level of Precision. Since our launchers were in 12-18 and amount of rockets we can fire, It does not matter for precision since the entire X Sq KM will be destroyed by them.
Also for precision we have Pralay which gives Range and Precision. I think they don't want to complicate them.
i am referring to the guided pinaka itself. the stated CEP is 60m, which is much higher than other guided MLRS out there
Shaurya doest has a MARV warhead which is separable, the whole missile drops down on target just like Iskander. Not sure if you will call the whole missile dropping as MARV itself even though it's maneuverable.If you are talking use case then yes a Shaurya QBM technically ticks all the boxes for for a HCM.
But propulsion remains the deciding factor when we talk about Hypersonic missile.
Anyway the maneuvering in the case of Shaurya starts in second stage even there we don't see drastic maneuvers that one would associate with a HCM(under the tolerance limits the missile can take on obviously)
But rather the final stage where the MaRV warhead of Shaurya starts to make endgame maneuvers.
So we have limited maneuvering capability during the second stage where shaurya lacks a bit behind traditional HCMs but yeah you can call it a HCM if we ignore lacking a scramjet
I have a question.Shaurya doest has a MARV warhead which is separable, the whole missile drops down on target just like Iskander. Not sure if you will call the whole missile dropping as MARV itself even though it's maneuverable.
Probably hypersonic in flight with supersonic in last stage with payload separation and speed reduction happening in last stage for release of torpedo.I have a question.
Is our SMART actually "supersonic" or a hypersonic HMART?
Yeah would also make sense for faster delivery of payload so that the target sub( and ship) doesn't have much time to get away.Probably hypersonic in flight with supersonic in last stage with payload separation and speed reduction happening in last stage for release of torpedo.
I don't think majority of flight would be in supersonic as that would mean different propellant but I doubt we did that.
This also makes me think that Shaurya and Pralay can be used to dispense self guided autonomous munitions to target enemy launchers and vehicles in depths.
Concept similiar to US Prsm mod missile
![]()
PrSM Ballistic Missiles Loaded With Coyote Drones, Hatchet Mini Smart Bombs Eyed By Army
Army Precision Strike Missiles loaded with precision munitions or drones would offer new ways to wreak havoc deep inside enemy territory.www.twz.com