DRDO & PSUs (26 Viewers)

28 Apaches never make sense till now.
It is neither an substantial squadron to fight, nor some sort of B2 which can destroy entire armoured column. It can't even perform well in Leh region.

We should have procured more C17, C130J and Chinooks for transport fleet. This is more useful then assault platforms like apache which is neither here nor there.
 
28 Apaches never make sense till now.
It is neither an substantial squadron to fight, nor some sort of B2 which can destroy entire armoured column. It can't even perform well in Leh region.

We should have procured more C17, C130J and Chinooks for transport fleet. This is more useful then assault platforms like apache which is neither here nor there.

Saddling India with useless stuff is the point.

South Korea, best kutta vassal of US cancelled an order of 36 Apaches because they found it to be expensive vs drones for anti armor

 
Apache and mq9b aren't any next gen platforms which will make the enemy shiver. Prachand and drdo hale are pretty much same, we have the sensor suite too. Just buy those man, pure idiots filled in central secretariat
 
Imagine if tomorrow americunts reach some sort of agreement with bat munchers then all our apaches will become useless, basically on board target system will refuse to designate Chinese tanks as threat.

View: https://x.com/alpha_defense/status/1946815853967634581?t=0oX3vft9yC0IZ9rcxYVMhA&s=19

View: https://x.com/alpha_defense/status/1946815322386022458?t=U0TlPJ6MHbCjG7MBcq7p1Q&s=19


>Focusing on Ching
>Not on Major US Non-NATO Ally next door

These gold plated Apaches are to be based in Jodhpur, not intended towards Chings.

Imagine if these wunderwaffe can't fire at their VT-4 Tanks :pmegusta:
 
28 Apaches never make sense till now.
It is neither an substantial squadron to fight, nor some sort of B2 which can destroy entire armoured column. It can't even perform well in Leh region.
To top above, search how many it was "pakda gaya chane ke khet main", only to be found and retrieved back to base
 
28 Apaches never make sense till now.
It is neither an substantial squadron to fight, nor some sort of B2 which can destroy entire armoured column. It can't even perform well in Leh region.

We should have procured more C17, C130J and Chinooks for transport fleet. This is more useful then assault platforms like apache which is neither here nor there.
Why do you need Apaches to fight in Leh? We'll be operating 171 LCH Prachand specifically designed for high altitude warfare in Ladakh. Apaches were procured to take-on pakistani armoured columns and it can do it's job very well. All 28 of them alone can carry 448 AGM-114 Hellfire ATGMs together.

C-17 production went off, and C-130/Chinooks are expensive, but Chinooks might be bought in larger numbers.
Saddling India with useless stuff is the point.

South Korea, best kutta vassal of US cancelled an order of 36 Apaches because they found it to be expensive vs drones for anti armor

Its just that they already operate 145 Attack helicopters, half of them are heavy Apaches and it makes more sense for them to buy Armed drones as they make them in house while they import Apaches. Both are mutually exclusive.

HALE/MALE drones are easier to shoot down. Houthis have shot down 7 of the Reapers since March.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top Bottom