DRDO & PSUs (27 Viewers)

[ArjunMK1A]

28 Apaches never make sense till now.
It is neither an substantial squadron to fight, nor some sort of B2 which can destroy entire armoured column. It can't even perform well in Leh region.

We should have procured more C17, C130J and Chinooks for transport fleet. This is more useful then assault platforms like apache which is neither here nor there.

 

[shade2]

28 Apaches never make sense till now.
It is neither an substantial squadron to fight, nor some sort of B2 which can destroy entire armoured column. It can't even perform well in Leh region.

We should have procured more C17, C130J and Chinooks for transport fleet. This is more useful then assault platforms like apache which is neither here nor there.

Saddling India with useless stuff is the point.

South Korea, best kutta vassal of US cancelled an order of 36 Apaches because they found it to be expensive vs drones for anti armor

South Korea Canceling AH-64 Apache Order A Sign Of What's To Come

While claims the attack helicopter is irrelevant are hyperbolic, their survivability, employability, and return on investment are definitely in question.

www.twz.com

 

[fire starter]

Imagine if tomorrow americunts reach some sort of agreement with bat munchers then all our apaches will become useless, basically on board target system will refuse to designate Chinese tanks as threat.

View: https://x.com/alpha_defense/status/1946815853967634581?t=0oX3vft9yC0IZ9rcxYVMhA&s=19

View: https://x.com/alpha_defense/status/1946815322386022458?t=U0TlPJ6MHbCjG7MBcq7p1Q&s=19

 

[liberalredditor]

Apache and mq9b aren't any next gen platforms which will make the enemy shiver. Prachand and drdo hale are pretty much same, we have the sensor suite too. Just buy those man, pure idiots filled in central secretariat

 

[shade2]

Imagine if tomorrow americunts reach some sort of agreement with bat munchers then all our apaches will become useless, basically on board target system will refuse to designate Chinese tanks as threat.

View: https://x.com/alpha_defense/status/1946815853967634581?t=0oX3vft9yC0IZ9rcxYVMhA&s=19

View: https://x.com/alpha_defense/status/1946815322386022458?t=U0TlPJ6MHbCjG7MBcq7p1Q&s=19

>Focusing on Ching
>Not on Major US Non-NATO Ally next door

These gold plated Apaches are to be based in Jodhpur, not intended towards Chings.

Imagine if these wunderwaffe can't fire at their VT-4 Tanks

 

[Anants]

28 Apaches never make sense till now.
It is neither an substantial squadron to fight, nor some sort of B2 which can destroy entire armoured column. It can't even perform well in Leh region.

To top above, search how many it was "pakda gaya chane ke khet main", only to be found and retrieved back to base

 

[FalconSlayers]

28 Apaches never make sense till now.
It is neither an substantial squadron to fight, nor some sort of B2 which can destroy entire armoured column. It can't even perform well in Leh region.

We should have procured more C17, C130J and Chinooks for transport fleet. This is more useful then assault platforms like apache which is neither here nor there.

Why do you need Apaches to fight in Leh? We'll be operating 171 LCH Prachand specifically designed for high altitude warfare in Ladakh. Apaches were procured to take-on pakistani armoured columns and it can do it's job very well. All 28 of them alone can carry 448 AGM-114 Hellfire ATGMs together.

C-17 production went off, and C-130/Chinooks are expensive, but Chinooks might be bought in larger numbers.

Saddling India with useless stuff is the point.

South Korea, best kutta vassal of US cancelled an order of 36 Apaches because they found it to be expensive vs drones for anti armor

South Korea Canceling AH-64 Apache Order A Sign Of What's To Come

While claims the attack helicopter is irrelevant are hyperbolic, their survivability, employability, and return on investment are definitely in question.

www.twz.com

Its just that they already operate 145 Attack helicopters, half of them are heavy Apaches and it makes more sense for them to buy Armed drones as they make them in house while they import Apaches. Both are mutually exclusive.

HALE/MALE drones are easier to shoot down. Houthis have shot down 7 of the Reapers since March.

 

[ArjunMK1A]

Why do you need Apaches to fight in Leh? We'll be operating 171 LCH Prachand specifically designed for high altitude warfare in Ladakh. Apaches were procured to take-on pakistani armoured columns and it can do it's job very well. All 28 of them alone can carry 448 AGM-114 Hellfire ATGMs together.

C-17 production went off, and C-130/Chinooks are expensive, but Chinooks might be bought in larger numbers.

Its just that they already operate 145 Attack helicopters, half of them are heavy Apaches and it makes more sense for them to buy Armed drones as they make them in house while they import Apaches. Both are mutually exclusive.

HALE/MALE drones are easier to shoot down. Houthis have shot down 7 of the Reapers since March.

We retrieved an apache in leh last year. Again the number is too less to do anything.

 

[FalconSlayers]

We retrieved an apache in leh last year. Again the number is too less to do anything.

Because we had limited LCH fleets to operate there leaving only them to be used.

 

[silentassassin265]

Imagine if tomorrow americunts reach some sort of agreement with bat munchers then all our apaches will become useless, basically on board target system will refuse to designate Chinese tanks as threat.

They're useless even today lol, who uses attack helicopters in this era. This was just a jizya purchase.
But we should have bought more chinooks instead, at least they would've been useful.

 

[shade2]

They're useless even today lol, who uses attack helicopters in this era. This was just a jizya purchase.
But we should have bought more chinooks instead, at least they would've been useful.

You can do the same job of anti-armor today with drones without any risk to pilot.

You have tanks in russia and ukraine with cope cage armor rather than some fancy APS system.

In defence budget, a portion must be reserved for jaziya purchases only.
Afterall these aren't defence buys per se but Diplomatic ghoos being paid.

 

[silentassassin265]

You can do the same job of anti-armor today with drones without any risk to pilot.

You have tanks in russia and ukraine with cope cage armor rather than some fancy APS system.

In defence budget, a portion must be reserved for jaziya purchases only.
Afterall these aren't defence buys per se but Diplomatic ghoos being paid.

That's true.
But we should pay jizya for platform we can actually use, in worst case scenario just purchase few million ammo instead of this obsolete platforms.

 

[shade2]

That's true.
But we should pay jizya for platform we can actually use, in worst case scenario just purchase few million ammo instead of this obsolete platforms.

We don't get to dictate Jaziya saar, Sultan Sam commands we have to pay, or else