- Joined
- Jun 30, 2024
- Messages
- 1,222
- Likes
- 2,557
But don't know why I've this weird feeling that we might be going for two medium sized (built around 2000lbs class PGMs) bomb bays on each side. Somthing similar to Boeing's X-45 line-
Are you saying the per bay payload is 1.5t!? I think it's combined payload is 1.5t.Is GHATAK enough for future antiship roles ?
Answer is both YES & NO
Above pic shows GHATAK is capable of carrying only 2 antiship missiles in one sortie which is less....
Ghatak is tiny and has limitations bcoz of its weapons bay dimensions and MTOW
So it might not carry BRAHMOS ER & VISHNU HCM ,Which is a big setback.
Weapons which it can carry are
it address today's requirements in both ground attack and antiship role...we might need a new bomber to carry 6-8 ER & VISHNU 🕉 HCM
Hope this info about ghatak helps
X47B wing design and ghatak wing design are different....Are you saying the per bay payload is 1.5t!? I think it's combined payload is 1.5t.
If each bay would be one and a half then your total payload would be 3t...that's bit off for these kind of UCAVs.
X-47B is a 20t MTOW, 65kN UCAV and still you only get 2t of payload. And it's a big UCAV.
View attachment 20235
No way you're going to fit Nirbhay and Rudram-III in that thing.
View attachment 20236
View attachment 20237
I guess GBU-10 type munitions should be the absolute maximum limit.
Pretty much this same scheme is followed in AMCA too. With only difference being you get two additional AAM capability (total additional payload of roughly 500kg) over the bomb capacity of Ghatak.