- Joined
- Jun 30, 2024
- Messages
- 3,565
- Likes
- 30,683

The thinking in Pakistan establishment before Op Sindoor was that India has much more to lose in conflict with Pakistan given it's higher gdp, growth rate and FDI. And Pakistan is already stagnating and has less to lose in comparison. This in their thinking deterred conflict with India and gave them space for unconventional warfare against India.
If this is the thinking in India too then why even bother with Op Sindoor type of operations and rhetoric, India can just absorb the pain like it was done pre 2016.
at some point all these "would have" "could have" theoretical assumptions have to consciously fall back on reality checks for confirmation. reality check here is what has been stated and executed by the actual main players in the game, in this case the gormint and security forces. they checked almost every box, that security focussed intelligentsia of the country have been debating on.
we need to have clarity on what has been achieved:
- demonstrate that terrorism is the primary issue between India and pakistan.
- combat proven tag to many of the defence equipment
- raise the cost of an misadventure i.e deterrence
- demonstrate restraint factored into the operational planning
- find space for conventional deterrence, as a response to sub-conventional warfare imposed by paki army.
- find space for conventional retaliation under nuclear overhang.
- call out nuclear bluff
- let pakis know, pakjabi heartland is no longer out of bounds
- there is space for both kinetic and non-kinetic responses.
- remind pakis of their lack of strategic depth .
- erase the distinction between jihadis and their state sponsors.
if folks want to apply their mind, and add more chapters to the playbook, can use the above mentioned points as the new baseline and build on it. we also have to be careful not to over read the outcomes, beyond a point so much so that it blurs the lines between hallucinations and reality.
do check if this answers you question.
People should realise and come out of this comparison mentality, our economic growth shouldn't be derailed over some worthless failed state. We shouldn't sacrifice anything, and we should ensure that.
YeahThey don't have anything worth extracting. "Waferless" kuchh bhi? The TATA fab is literally a wafer fab worth $11 billion. There is a Micron OSAT semiconductor plant worth $3 bn in Sanand as well. A petrochem refinery getting hit is no joke. How difficult is it to comprehend?
From a strategic perspective, why so many billions dollars worth of industry and data center is being concentrated in Jamnagar?Yeah
Billions of dollars worth investment losing will be detrimental
I'm sure GoI also knows this hence all this Measured non-escalatory nonsense
People are not relevant here. GoI isnt total duffers. Op Sindoor remains pretty much only operation in last 20 years where massive damage is dealt at the cost of nil losses, at worst, negligible losses ( 5 planes cost to bow up 11 airbases and terror sites, including nook storage facility is the bargain of the century), even if true.But in interest of economic growth, if India doesn't hit back next time then it is back to square one. Established deterrence will start withering away and be gone entirely soon enough.
If India hits back but doesn't ensure escalation dominance then it will be Pakistan who would be thinking that they have established deterrence.
5 aircrafts were not shot downPeople are not relevant here. GoI isnt total duffers. Op Sindoor remains pretty much only operation in last 20 years where massive damage is dealt at the cost of nil losses, at worst, negligible losses ( 5 planes cost to bow up 11 airbases and terror sites, including nook storage facility is the bargain of the century), even if true.
In such a scenario, India has zero reason to not strike back, unless overwhelming intelligence is recieved of PAK recieving some sort of game-changer strike capability to retaliate in disproportionate ways.
Pak has done a lot on social media, but reality is simple - we have no record of any local media of any credibility of any losses taken, that the govt is trying to hide and 5 planes going down is going to leave SOME sort of local new trail ( at least weird truck movements to retrieve debris etc)- which is all lacking.
So reality is, this has been a blowout victory for India. In such a status quo, India has zero reasons to sit back and take a repeat Pehlgam 2.0 scenario and do kari-ninda and nothing else.
But in interest of economic growth, if India doesn't hit back next time then it is back to square one. Established deterrence will start withering away and be gone entirely soon enough.
If India hits back but doesn't ensure escalation dominance then it will be Pakistan who would be thinking that they have established deterrence.
Recent developments point to that onlyUN designated terrorist Masood Azhar reportedly spotted in Skardu, PoJK. Acc to intelligence inputs, he is freely moving in Gilgit-Baltistan under full state protection. Recent mock drill in Skardu Airport is a coverup. They are planning a massive terrorist attack sooner. Pak received multiple warheads from china & turkey, testing and preparation are underway by PAF.
Let us know how we can contribute. We need to make this as brandHosting cost.
Which target is this? Previously unreported?
View: https://x.com/rajfortyseven/status/1946437677403844843
I think the crippling effect on economy/nation will be order of magnitudes higher on Pakistani side than India. India will have alternate supply chain and plants elsewhere and much more financial capital to bring damaged infra back online soon.
For example, hypothetically if India destroys Karachi port and Pakistan destroys JNPT, India would still have alternate mega ports but with Pakistan almost 80% capacity be gone for years.
You want a happily ever after Fairy tale ?But in interest of economic growth, if India doesn't hit back next time then it is back to square one. Established deterrence will start withering away and be gone entirely soon enough.
If India hits back but doesn't ensure escalation dominance then it will be Pakistan who would be thinking that they have established deterrence. In this case, even though you can argue that sub-conventional warfare is not cost free for them anymore, but giving Pakistan military a sense that they can achieve escalation dominance with India is more dangerous in my opinion.
it is pointless to discuss and ruminate over trump's statement, we already know that jets have been downed on both sides. From a political pov opposition may use this to target bjp again and paijans with 30000 black fighter jets will use his statement to validate their claim to 'victory'. so, nothing new comes of it, the cycle only repeats.
I don't get it if people just reply without reading or understanding the posts.You want a happily ever after Fairy tale ?
There is no such thing with Pakistan.. Deterrence established by India has always had an expiry date.. Be it 65 war, 71 war, or 2016, 2019 or Operator Sindoor..
What India gets in return for Kicking Pakistan in the head, is a few years of respite until the next big attacks... How many years of respite from a big attacks..? I don't know..
But, India will not be strong enough to impose a final Solution to Pakistan, atleast for another 2 decades .
I don't get it if people just reply without reading or understanding the posts.
This is precisely what I am arguing that don't give up the momentum and precedence that Op Sindoor established. To hit back next time even if there is risk of economic targets getting hit during next cycle of hostilities/exchange otherwise the deterrence effect will be lost. Just like Op Sindoor, it is important for India to have the escalation dominance by the end and not to conclude it like the Balakot exchange.
I raised a question that if economic interests are supreme and India do not want to accept losses in case Pakistan chooses to climb the escalation ladder then why do Op Sindoor and rhetoric at all. To clarify, my position is that India should keep climbing the escalation ladder until Pakistan backs down.
Earlier replies for context