Impact dynamics and debris distribution in case of a shoot down is complex. You are oversimplifying that both engines should be visible next to each other otherwise not a 2 engine fighter.
Re your evidence:
With
crashes
- MIG-29 engine crash, where is the second engine so no MIG-29 crashed?
https://bangladeshdefence.blogspot.com/2014/06/crashed-mig-29-fighter-aircraft-of.html
View attachment 43826
- SU-30 MKI crash, if someone just made a video of the sole engine by the wall and shared that does that mean no SU-30 MKI crashed?
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6toEWnU5pQView attachment 43827
With
shoot downs:
- Russian SU-25 shoot down in Syria, where is the second engine or other wrekage nearby so no SU-25 crashed?
https://www.voanews.com/a/russian-jet-downed-over-idlib-syria/4237757.html
View attachment 43828
- Ukraine MIG-29 shoot down, where is the second engine so no MIG-29 crashed?
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/russia-ukr...-ukraines-mig-29-fighter-jet-8-drones/2599109
View attachment 43829
Also, F16 mid air collision with Cessna, part of the engine broke up and is located away from main wreckage spot:
The National Transportation Safety Board has released a preliminary report in connection to the collision of a Cessna C-150 and an F-16, killing a father and son.
www.wyff4.com
View attachment 43830
If you ever worked in a Boeing plant, I pray that I never fly in an aircraft that you actually worked on.