Operation Sindoor and Aftermath

Mail-SPL-468-X60-2x
Muh "narrative war" is a case of don't play the game if you cry after losing, you either play and win or don't play, operation goals are important, engaging in narrative is a choice, if someone is sacred of conducting sead/dead ops because of muh narrative that guy has already lost it and should not cry.
makes no sense we did not do SEAD to keep the "narrative" in our favor. But then let western MSMs backed by porki/chinki bots run their propaganda against us. Even after weeks no corrective steps were taken.
Instead after our cds went and gave a "muh rational descalation saar" interview admitting we lost air assets. Why was domestic media not briefed about this first? Why no press conferences? Why is our cds fumbling words in front of hostile phoren media?
 
Getting a sense that there is a distinct lack of exposure of the Armed Forces towards global media management. Something very amateurish about it, like it's running on 20 year old specifications. It started with the Vikri Misri-Sofia Qureshi-Vyomika Singh tepid lacklustre, stuttering, stammering press conferences. Thought the DGMO press conferences weren't the greatest but a step in the right direction. Today's interview is a downright joke.

They need a deshi DJ Ice-Pyaar to handle interviews.

Then again it could be this Genrol works for some other team, after Bipin Rawat was ((( accidented ))) I do not trust the replacements.
 
Getting a sense that there is a distinct lack of exposure of the Armed Forces towards global media management. Something very amateurish about it, like it's running on 20 year old specifications. It started with the Vikri Misri-Sofia Qureshi-Vyomika Singh tepid lacklustre, stuttering, stammering press conferences. Thought the DGMO press conferences weren't the greatest but a step in the right direction. Today's interview is a downright joke.
These officers have studied from officer schools, their entire world view comes from what they have studied like 30 years ago. Our boomer class refuses to get out of their outdates world view
 
Post is good but this man occupying the position is a chootiya at best a traitor at worst ..sorry for the wording but his actions are deplorable..any sensible guy should have resigned by now
Arey bhai why is it so difficult to understand that what he said, he was told to say! Let's wait for more revelations.
 
This man was called out of retirement and given CDS post . A special notification was issued to accommodate retired 3* officers for CDS .. Guess why ? blame the leadership who chose him for the post ..Not him
Not to brag but I can give better interview than him and guess what I am not a good public speaker ..Ffs..this our best of best who climbed to ladder of general then I am very sorry about our selection process
 
Are you suggesting that when a BM like Fatah features on a radar screen it carries a tag - Fatah 1 or 2 with it ? Is that your understanding of how warfare of this nature is conducted ?
Yes..it carries a tag.. that tag is its range and flight path, which tells you whether it is Pakistan's primary nuclear delivery vehicle .. India and China also have conventional ballistic missiles..
China has a whole bevy of conventional ballistic missiles in the thousands which will be used in any conflict..

And believe me, even with all this nuclear mardangiri on every side . No bosadiwala will retaliate with nukes, to China's use of conventional ballistic missiles, just because it could carry nukes..
Enemy having a massive nuclear arsenal means unless your army is on the verge of destruction or have been nuked yourself, no country will retaliate with nukes..
 
Last edited:
Arey bhai why is it so difficult to understand that what he said, he was told to say! Let's wait for more revelations.
Ohh..come on ..You sound like a "I don't drink but my friends forced me to drink it "
Dude he is not 5 years old ..He could have easily avoided the question but nooo .this loudmouth has to make a statement and that too so stupid that it is against our country interest..
If you are so concerned about the media outlet why the fuck you gave interview ?? Did he was paid money to sell his country ??
 
No need to go on a meltdown. Losses are part of conflicts. Loss of 2-3 jets is nothing in comparison to what we achieved in those few days. My only gripe with this interview is how he presented it that's it. I think IAF will release a report eventually with which assets we lossed and how many PAF jets we might have downed.
It's not about the losses, it's about the narrative, no one here cares how many we loses, we only care how the narrative is
 
Yes..it carries a tag.. that tag is its range and flight path, which tells you whether it is Pakistan's primary nuclear delivery vehicle ..
Don't be ridiculous man. Haven't you heard of depressed trajectories ? There's a reason our Dhotis egged on by our babooos didn't approve of the Pralay , Prahar etc all this while even if it's development ceased more than a decade ago.

The reason was as simple as not alarming the Paxtanis by shooting a conventionally armed BM across lest they get the wrong impression that we've initiated N hostilities & initiate usage of N weapons themselves .

India and China also have conventional ballistic missiles..
China has a whole bevy of conventional ballistic missiles in the thousands which will be used in any conflict..
China has a NFU policy.
And believe me, even with all this nuclear mardangiri on every side . No bosadiwala will retaliate with nukes, to China's use of conventional ballistic missiles, just because it could carry nukes..
... China's use of conventional ballistic missile just because it carries nukes ? Epithets apart , what exactly are you trying to convey here ?

Enemy having a massive nuclear arsenal means unless your army is on the verge of destruction or have been nukes yourself, no country will retaliate with nukes..
What exactly are we debating here ? The general's messaging or the Nuclear usage policy of various nations which in this case happens to be Paxtan ?

I was specifically referring to the general's statements. Everything else at this point is extraneous to this discussion. That's the way I see it .

Please decide what's the crux of the matter & frame your arguments accordingly.
 
Gloomberg would never interview a 4 star yankee general about fighter losses to the Houthis. Giving a 1 on 1 interview to these clowns is the first mistake.

Babus in the gormint failed to realize this is a setup from the very beginning.

Anyway, He should've atleast said something about Paki jet losses, instead he launched into 'how we learnt from our mistakes yada yada'. Atleast say we crashed 3 or more Paki jets in return, kon verify karega. Standard good boy syndrome.

not sure for now, we can only speculate, and within speculations almost every possibility is covered by the members in this thread.
something went down that's what the forces are confirming.

It could very well be this Genrol isn't """"street smart"""" and isn't cut out for interviews wagera, he was setup for this by some babooze without the dhoti class realizing what this is.

If he had to give an interview to gora rags atleast like with Leaderji's interviews, they could have asked for questions before hand and only agreed to answer those questions.

Possibilities are the
>Genrol is playing for some other team
>Genrol was Ambushed by goora patrakars and sent there by traitor babooze
>Genrol is repeating Govt approved lines, but then again why? and why with goora interviewers?
 
Ohh..come on ..You sound like a "I don't drink but my friends forced me to drink it "
Dude he is not 5 years old ..He could have easily avoided the question but nooo .this loudmouth has to make a statement and that too so stupid that it is against our country interest..
If you are so concerned about the media outlet why the fuck you gave interview ?? Did he was paid money to sell his country ??
I still can't fathom why you can't understand how these media engagements happen?? These are not some random meet-ups, not scheduled or not well rehearsed. Hence, we need to watch out for more clarifications!
 
It will be a loss if you accept defeat. This is exactly why Pakis are good at it. There's lots of other instances of aerial engagement. India intercepted every last drone and missile launched in it's territory. The integrated air defense system played a huge role. There is so much material that is independently verifiable by satellite pics from private vendors but you lot just love to engage in any topic Pakis deflect to. Quit whining. There's evidence of only one plane being shot down and that is from Bathinda. Take the loss but don't forget what has been inflicted on.

Imagine if the US bombed Beijing, Shanghai, Shandong, Guangzhou, Hong Kong and a bunch of Han Chinese cities and all the Chinese had to show for it is a downed F-22 and a F-35. Would it be a win? Stop accepting defeat and stop getting mind broken so easily yaar.

No, it's not just symbolic. Other than monetary and economic costs, there is a term in economics called "opportunity costs". If those air force stations weren't rendered inoperable, it would've given Pakis the chance to retaliate properly with air assets where they have a BVR advantage. By striking runways, they may have had billions of dollars of equipment that wasn't damaged but they couldn't use it either. What's the point of having a fighter jet that you can't use to retaliate? It's not like we stopped at that. We bombed hangars (an AWACS was "damaged", 2 C-130s were visually confirmed to be on fire, etc.). We bombed their trailer based commands. We destroyed radars and HQ9/HQ16 batteries with visual confirmation.
Like i said for defence enthusiasts our lot is very thin skinned,bc why are you scared of loss of few jets I'd gladly take out rout of pak airbases with assets being destroyed even at cost of few jets down
 
The word unspecified is word play added by the boom bugg side and not by the general . Either Govt should have issued a communication saying no interview should be given to foreign press on his visit to singapore .

But then he is there for Shangri la dialogue which itself discuss about Geopolitics and Military can't blame the general at all ..

names of the reporters who wrote the piece and she is the one who recorded that interview too

View attachment 37953
Eggs FUCKING jactly ,deep state and Pakis at work also did you saw any paki giving interview outside after mishap of shahbaz sharif and their defence "a bit louda" minister
 
It could very well be this Genrol isn't """"street smart"""" and isn't cut out for interviews wagera, he was setup for this by some babooze without the dhoti class realizing what this is.

If he had to give an interview to gora rags atleast like with Leaderji's interviews, they could have asked for questions before hand and only agreed to answer those questions.

Possibilities are the
>Genrol is playing for some other team
>Genrol was Ambushed by goora patrakars and sent there by traitor babooze
>Genrol is repeating Govt approved lines, but then again why? and why with goora interviewers?
The genlol seems like a shantidoot, muh honor and sem-2-sem type. But some baboon was clealry involved in setting him and the phoren journorandi was probably feed info about it from our 5th columnists.
Maybe leaderji set him up to fail so that he can take the blame. idk
 
DJ ISPR and shehbaz sharif recently accepted that nur khan and rahimyar khan were struck by Brahmos, and now they are clean. No media will question them on these.

Similar presser should have been done by IAF too, we lost 2 fighter jets but in return we destroyed XYZ things of enemy. THE END.

You hide your losses just because of political pressure then you are getting trapped in a much bigger info warfare.
 
Don't be ridiculous man. Haven't you heard of depressed trajectories ? There's a reason our Dhotis egged on by our babooos didn't approve of the Pralay , Prahar etc all this while even if it's development ceased more than a decade ago.
Pralay is operational.
Depressed trajectories indicate a modern nuke delivery vehicle, which PAK will use if it means to nuke India.. Fatah missiles are old and easy to intercept.. not ones that Pakistan would use to deliver nukes..

China has a NFU policy.
China still threatened India with nukes during Sumdurong Chu standoff..although China has NFU since 1960s
India too might not be strictly NFU..and might use counter force tactical nukes if nuclear use by Pakistan is imminent.. Ultimately these NFU declarations don't mean much..and you can't base your military plans on enemy's good intentions..

... China's use of conventional ballistic missile just because it carries nukes ? Epithets apart , what exactly are you trying to convey here ?

I wrote China's so called conventional ballistic missiles "could" be carrying nukes.. DF-17 or DF-26 could be nuclear delivery vehicles as well.. But, no country will initiate a nuclear war against China just because a DF-17 or DF-26 is in the air and moving towards them, and could be carrying nukes.. because initiating a nuclear war against a major nuclear war is guarantee to have one's own ass turned into radio active toast..
 
VPN-HSL-468-X60-2x

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top