Idiotic Musings from the West

Also
View attachment 30965

Honest IJA reaction to the GOOK SAMURAI

He is not even Japanese, he is Korean.

That's what I said,he's a gook but claims to be a "Samurai". Dude forgot(or straight up ignored) what the japs used to do to his countrymen.

You have to use Samurai when you're country is famous for only effeminate, makeup laden femboys😂

To his Amerish*rt audience, all Azns aka Chinkoids are the same.

That his grandmothers were the playthings of the Samurais and his grandfathers were training dummy for them matters not.


Chuds simp for these chinkus for whatever reason
bhaiyo you guys are malding over some meme 🤷‍♂️ that too something 4chan picked up in early 2010, a good 15 years old bakloli at it 🤷‍♂️

perhaps he's just a schizo meme'er because the context behind 'jews fear samurai' quote is from some japani schizoid named 'Haku Zynkyoku' that merged Nazi Flag to Japanese Flag like this, who literally larped about things around 2010s, including this
1745139795513.webp
^this became a well known meme among 4channers, but there are more contents with this guy



View: https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalCompassMemes/comments/fyqhqx/samurai/
 
"Somehow"

View attachment 31005

As i've said before, there is 0 consequence to being racist to Indians openly, or attacking and killing them

Anti chink sentiment is more mainstream than ever before. There are YouTube channels with subscriber count in tens of millions that post stuffs that even a toddler would consider to be blatant racial profiling/stereotyping but keep garnering millions in views regardless. And YouTube is the normiest of normie SM, mind it.

You can call Indians steetshitter, shitskin, pajeet in public, nothing will happen
Meanwhile dare to even put a few conspiracies that don't even name ((( them ))) in public and you will be cancelled.

Any based white trash making a public comment like that would be immediately patrolled and put into a prison. Contrary to whay many might think, the gora nations (I am talking about the richer ones here, not the East European shotholes) take such incidents very very seriously. Chuds have got their apartments raided for far far less - for merely spray painting wojacks on highway walls.
 
Last edited:
bhaiyo you guys are malding over some meme 🤷‍♂️ that too something 4chan picked up in early 2010, a good 15 years old bakloli at it 🤷‍♂️

perhaps he's just a schizo meme'er because the context behind 'jews fear samurai' quote is from some japani schizoid named 'Haku Zynkyoku' that merged Nazi Flag to Japanese Flag like this, who literally larped about things around 2010s, including this
View attachment 31009
^this became a well known meme among 4channers, but there are more contents with this guy



View: https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalCompassMemes/comments/fyqhqx/samurai/

Well,that Arthur gook ain't some schizo memer,but a schizo nazitard shitlerboo,check his account. The "Jews fear Samurai" is a meme indeed,but many korean tojoboos/shitlerboos also exist(like him) that Ironically think of themselves like that(like the slavic shitlerboos do). There's an entire political movement based on that.
 
Last edited:
bhaiyo you guys are malding over some meme 🤷‍♂️ that too something 4chan picked up in early 2010, a good 15 years old bakloli at it 🤷‍♂️

perhaps he's just a schizo meme'er because the context behind 'jews fear samurai' quote is from some japani schizoid named 'Haku Zynkyoku' that merged Nazi Flag to Japanese Flag like this, who literally larped about things around 2010s, including this
View attachment 31009
^this became a well known meme among 4channers, but there are more contents with this guy



View: https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalCompassMemes/comments/fyqhqx/samurai/


Arre I know the meme, but then it's irony pro plus max about a gimbap muncher appropriating anything Japanese
Given their history.

Actually it's the present also, the original Jap 4chan pe they roast these K-f4gs daily
 
The sheer demoralization of Brits and of-course the complementary Britcope, i.e. after finally receiving the same subversion they levied on "their colonies".


View: https://youtu.be/26mLdpZWwpY?si=e2zGTGt-LFuN_hnq


Anything bad happens to the Anglo and i only get schadenfreude. :cmegusta:

And about the bolded you are correct, they are only getting a taste of what Bharat was subjected to for 200 years and counting.
 
Anything bad happens to the Anglo and i only get schadenfreude. :cmegusta:

And about the bolded you are correct, they are only getting a taste of what Bharat was subjected to for 200 years and counting.
Fr, at around 33:40 this clown starts talking about how, despite the constant “false propaganda” about the alleged crimes against humanity the British Empire committed in India, they’re still gonna be proud of their imperial history. Unlike their American counterparts, who he says have gone down with the propaganda of white guilt. These goofy ass mfs honestly deserve all the shit they get.
 
Fr, at around 33:40 this clown starts talking about how, despite the constant “false propaganda” about the alleged crimes against humanity the British Empire committed in India, they’re still gonna be proud of their imperial history. Unlike their American counterparts, who he says have gone down with the propaganda of white guilt. These goofy ass mfs honestly deserve all the shit they get.
funny thing is, brits get completely tongue tied, when i point out that they are the ONLY PEOPLE in history of the planet to genocide two entire continents ( North America and Australia) - not even Chinggis or Timur was as successful a genocider on a continental scale as the anglo.

Then i point out that looking at the Welsh, Scottish and Irish, i am happy we were ruled for 800 years by Turkic muslim savages and only 200 years by the anglo savages, instead of the other way round. Else like the Scots, Irish and Welsh - all British ethnic minorities - we would've had our language and culture erased and thank God the turki is just a standard genocider and not genocider + culture wiper like the anglo is.

Oh and i also drop the final bomb that its the Anglos, not hitler who invented concentration camps, as concentration camps are from Boer war, where anglos didnt know what to do with these white boers and didnt just shoot them at sight like they did with zulus but put them in cages and awaited instruction from London.
Hell, at nuremberg trials, we see gestapo and SS documents bitching at German army for slow construction of concentration camps and asking them if they read the memos on the brits and how they did it 50 years ago.

This is usually leads to system crash frothing by the inbred limey.
 
funny thing is, brits get completely tongue tied, when i point out that they are the ONLY PEOPLE in history of the planet to genocide two entire continents ( North America and Australia) - not even Chinggis or Timur was as successful a genocider on a continental scale as the anglo.

Then i point out that looking at the Welsh, Scottish and Irish, i am happy we were ruled for 800 years by Turkic muslim savages and only 200 years by the anglo savages, instead of the other way round. Else like the Scots, Irish and Welsh - all British ethnic minorities - we would've had our language and culture erased and thank God the turki is just a standard genocider and not genocider + culture wiper like the anglo is.

Oh and i also drop the final bomb that its the Anglos, not hitler who invented concentration camps, as concentration camps are from Boer war, where anglos didnt know what to do with these white boers and didnt just shoot them at sight like they did with zulus but put them in cages and awaited instruction from London.
Hell, at nuremberg trials, we see gestapo and SS documents bitching at German army for slow construction of concentration camps and asking them if they read the memos on the brits and how they did it 50 years ago.

This is usually leads to system crash frothing by the inbred limey.

They too delete culture and tribal identity, what else is "Turkey" and "Azerbaijan" today, let alone Central Asia.
I do agree that the pic related is a different level of calculated evil, Turkification of places can be put down to the natives being bitches and pussies, not as some planned Turkic policy,

However as for the Anglo, he will go for the tribe's language, culture and soul, he knows exactly what he is doing and what are the results

200 years of Anglo rule did more damage to the soul of Bharat than 1000 years of green rule.

British-Merchant-Eternal-Anglo.webp
 
funny thing is, brits get completely tongue tied, when i point out that they are the ONLY PEOPLE in history of the planet to genocide two entire continents ( North America and Australia) - not even Chinggis or Timur was as successful a genocider on a continental scale as the anglo.

Then i point out that looking at the Welsh, Scottish and Irish, i am happy we were ruled for 800 years by Turkic muslim savages and only 200 years by the anglo savages, instead of the other way round. Else like the Scots, Irish and Welsh - all British ethnic minorities - we would've had our language and culture erased and thank God the turki is just a standard genocider and not genocider + culture wiper like the anglo is.

Oh and i also drop the final bomb that its the Anglos, not hitler who invented concentration camps, as concentration camps are from Boer war, where anglos didnt know what to do with these white boers and didnt just shoot them at sight like they did with zulus but put them in cages and awaited instruction from London.
Hell, at nuremberg trials, we see gestapo and SS documents bitching at German army for slow construction of concentration camps and asking them if they read the memos on the brits and how they did it 50 years ago.

This is usually leads to system crash frothing by the inbred limey.
Don't take this as some defence of the anglo scum .. but the child touching turks straight up made the greeks of anatolia not only change their religion or culture but their race as well .. hence the meme of the turkish guy taking an ancestry test with the results being 90% greek.
 
They too delete culture and tribal identity, what else is "Turkey" and "Azerbaijan" today, let alone Central Asia.
I do agree that the pic related is a different level of calculated evil, Turkification of places can be put down to the natives being bitches and pussies, not as some planned Turkic policy,

However as for the Anglo, he will go for the tribe's language, culture and soul, he knows exactly what he is doing and what are the results

200 years of Anglo rule did more damage to the soul of Bharat than 1000 years of green rule.

View attachment 31187

well i dont give a shit about oghuz turks or other turks. When i said thank god for the turki, i meant the ones who came to india. mass murdered us for religion and raped us coz they are jaahils, but didnt go around wiping out our language - instead they got absorbed into ours lol.

Btw, turks come in three categories : Oghuz, Kipchak and Karluk. We the Desis have mostly been invaded by karluk turks, as they are the Uzbeks/Uzbekistan-tajikistan turks who repeatedly migrated to afghanistan then invaded us. The khiljis were also Karluk turks.

Long story short, the main difference between these turkic groups, apart from mutually intelligible languages ( Azeri to Turki or Turcoman is like Hindi to punjabi, same as Uzbek to Uyghur or Kazakh to karakalpak, whereas Azeri to Uzbek is like hindi to gujarati), they also share cultural traits.

1. Kipchak turks =Kazakh + karakalpak + Kyrghyz =the most libbu normie turks in history. They usually are the mildest turks in terms of raiding and ironically, the most turki-turks in traditionalism - in kazkahstan its still not unheard-of for city dude to retire and fuck off to live in yurt like his ancestors. They are also the turks Russian empire +commie had the most trouble to settle down with - they LOVE their horse nomad lifestyle and still many aspire for the good old days but with modern amenities. Ofcourse, Kyrghyz are like the drunk boisterous loud tough guy act of the turks people so they buck this Kipchak-ism trend of 'bhodro shobbo' to a certain degree. Kyrghyz are costa-ricans of the turki world - itching for a fight by trying to prove he is bestest turk of them all at everything.

2. Karluk Turks = Ozbeg+Uyghur = the most arabised turks. They are the same same as arabs+afghans = they will genocide the living shit outta you better than anyone other turk, but will do it over laalach + religion. Timur,Babur, Alauddin, Bhaktiyar, etc were ALL karluk turks. The karluk motto is 'bring me heads'.

3. Oghuz Turks =Turkish+Azeri+Turkmen= the most insiduous turks. They hate u, but usually are like the british - will only attack when the odds favour them, have no problems running the eff away when it suits them, but they will come up with a socio-cultural SYSTEM to wipe any and all trace of your people out and assimilate YOU into them, the same way the numerically few anglo-saxon-jutes did to the celts of England. They, like the english are the turks most consumed by self-aggrandizing notions of racism, supremacy, etc etc. to pat themselves on the back for being the most accomplished turks in being imperialist fascists. They are what we bengalis would call the 'haramjada turks'.

Most Indians, even medium-wigs i have interacted from embassies dont know this about the Turki world.

Ofcourse, this is a over-simplification, like any rule of thumb is- just like Punjabis = truck driver+farmer+soldier type and bong = intellectual doctor engineer teacher type is a rule of thumb but not always true.

PS: Turks come in 3+ categories if you wanna be really technical, coz a lot of the siberian tribes are classed as turks by language, but no one knows where they fit in this 3 type system or have another type or how many.
But siberian tribe turks are the arunachalis of turks - theres 300 tribes of them but sum total population of like 5 million.
So for our discussion, i think the 3 main types are the ones that matter- for now and in history.

PPS: this 3 system fracture in turki world is ALSO a big driver against turki-unity btw. They too have their ethnic tensions. For eg Oghuz and Karluk turks HAATE each other.
 
Last edited:
They too delete culture and tribal identity, what else is "Turkey" and "Azerbaijan" today, let alone Central Asia.
I do agree that the pic related is a different level of calculated evil, Turkification of places can be put down to the natives being bitches and pussies, not as some planned Turkic policy,

However as for the Anglo, he will go for the tribe's language, culture and soul, he knows exactly what he is doing and what are the results

200 years of Anglo rule did more damage to the soul of Bharat than 1000 years of green rule.

View attachment 31187
Greens were one level of civilization behind us, being nomadic hunter-gatherers. Both Arabs and Turks.
They had expertise in eradicating fellow nomadic tribes with methods like kidnapping females and killing all males.

However, they were clueless regarding sophisticated agrarian civilizations like India.

Their attempts to eradicate us were almost limited to targeting Indian cities and massacring the inhabitants. This was woefully useless as Indian cities at that time only housed 10% of the population.
Even this was extremely hard, often taking decades to subjugate Indian city states.

Killing Indian villagers was even harder as they engaged in guerrilla warfare and often came with consequences.
Ex - killing of Ghuri by Kokhar tribal villagers,
Timur facing resistance by Khap militants at Meerut etc.
Maratha warfare against Mughals.
They dealt with Indian villagers by vassalizing the local king ruling the area, and the king, in turn, used clan alliances to keep them from revolting.

Brits, however, were aware of the functioning of an agrarian civilization as they had transitioned to industrial civilization from it.

They knew most Indians practised subsistence farming and making this harder would lead to mass famines and genocide on a much larger scale.

Hence death toll in 2 centuries of Brit rule surpasses 5 centuries of green rule.
 
Greens were one level of civilization behind us, being nomadic hunter-gatherers. Both Arabs and Turks.
They had expertise in eradicating fellow nomadic tribes with methods like kidnapping females and killing all males.

However, they were clueless regarding sophisticated agrarian civilizations like India.

Their attempts to eradicate us were almost limited to targeting Indian cities and massacring the inhabitants. This was woefully useless as Indian cities at that time only housed 10% of the population.
Even this was extremely hard, often taking decades to subjugate Indian city states.

Killing Indian villagers was even harder as they engaged in guerrilla warfare and often came with consequences.
Ex - killing of Ghuri by Kokhar tribal villagers,
Timur facing resistance by Khap militants at Meerut etc.
Maratha warfare against Mughals.
They dealt with Indian villagers by vassalizing the local king ruling the area, and the king, in turn, used clan alliances to keep them from revolting.

Brits, however, were aware of the functioning of an agrarian civilization as they had transitioned to industrial civilization from it.

They knew most Indians practised subsistence farming and making this harder would lead to mass famines and genocide on a much larger scale.

Hence death toll in 2 centuries of Brit rule surpasses 5 centuries of green rule.

yes, this is why the brits are the biggest curse on humanity. Remember, they are called 'perfidious albion' in BOTH spanish and French and its not without reason- once most of agrarian britain unified into England, it turned into a perfect mixture for the worst mix of imperialism + genocide-mongering superiorism as their island statehood kept them pretty much insulated from major population mixings as was common in the mediterranean or rest of the world, just as a matter of transit and settlement.

United Kingdom, as an agrarian society that develops as precursor to Industrial soceity is effectively England - people forget that 90% or more of farmlands in UK are in england, as wales and most of scotland is unsuitable for farming and just moors and grazelands. Even the prime farming regions of scotland - the english marches - is broken hillock country rather than flat farmlands of central england. The only farmlands of any consequential size lies in Ireland - which even as a whole is less than 30% of england's farmland area and England has never had full control of more than 50% of ireland in terms of resource extraction, at best.

Japan in Asia also shows this same tendency of being by far the most 'anglo copy-cats' in terms of ethnic pride, racism and perfidity - but the japanese are noobs at this compared to the anglos culturally and they arent so much as pucca 500 year experience racist superiorists hell-bent on world domination, they are your standard xenophobic island culture tucked away who went on a conquest spree when it got industrially tagraa.
Japan hardly attempted much to 'japanify' the manchurians or koreans or the chinese - they were more than happy being basically the Uzbeg lord over them but we shall never know for sure because at the end of the day, japan never got 5% the time of UK at empire building and society shaping.

England was a prime factor imperialism because england was ideally placed to go conquer the world - it had the same internal advantages as japan - extremely rich productive farmlands AND dense wooded hills - you could make 10 kids per family, build ships off off the lumber and go whack people in your ships as much as you wish was their blessing. But unlike Japan, they didnt have to stare down a leviathan like China for all their history as the nearest land shore to go mess around with.

This is also why studying british history, its clearly apparent that if the goal is to make UK forever irrelevant in world history or atleast for the next 1000 years, its working brilliantly :
UK is resource poor for industrial era AND they have cut down all their trees long before industial era fully got going via electricity, so they are internally very poorly located in current era to matter - just like how in Roman era, England was a set of bogs and marshes and had far lower population density than Roman England or Anglo-Saxon England and didnt matter much then.
But more importantly, england in the roman era was divided by clan structures - they were like the pathans except also far more primitive in warfare ( no less a source than Cicero, who visited Julius Caesar for his fabled wow-za first time ever roman visit to England, wrote back to his wife that he aint bringing any brit slaves coz they are too stupid to learn music or basic counting and she better buy nubian slaves or whatever back in roman markets).
And without industrial capacity, ultimately, UK will be a on factor in modern warfare and as it further gets internally divided, its going back to its history of pre-1200 AD : dehati island of no consequence just off the coast of europe with a shit ton of internal conflict.

If humanity is to learn from history, then it must learn why England can never be offered the chance to compete for top end power ever again.
A decent sized island for human habitation is primed for turning into the worst type of hitler-island known to mankind. and they did.
 
PS: Turks come in 3+ categories if you wanna be really technical, coz a lot of the siberian tribes are classed as turks by language, but no one knows where they fit in this 3 type system or have another type or how many.
But siberian tribe turks are the arunachalis of turks - theres 300 tribes of them but sum total population of like 5 million.
Tatars?
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top