- Joined
- Jul 12, 2024
- Messages
- 1,187
- Likes
- 4,434
I disagree with your claim that Modi’s response to the Pahalgam attack projecting normalcy and planning retaliation against Pakistan, is justified just because it mirrors U.S. and Israeli tactics.
This is an attack on Indian soil with local Kashmiri involvement, demanding that I see India crush the internal insurgency, not externalise the fight to Pakistan or downplay the crisis.
We need to halt Kashmir’s unrest to send a clear message to separatist insurgencies across India, from Naxalites to Northeast rebels, rather than relying on vague promises of “badlaa.”
The U.S. post-9/11 faced an external enemy and spent billions on internal security, revamping everything, including the ideological framework.
Israel fights defined border threats, neither fits Kashmir’s local militancy, which is fueled by anti-India, anti-Hindu hate flowing subterranean and on your face.
The IRA’s insurgency showed how British “normalcy” rhetoric inflamed rebellion.
I want Modi to launch intense security sweeps targeting local, showing other separatists that rebellion won’t stand.
Retaliating against Pakistan, like Balakot (2019), doesn’t stop local recruitment. It is Islam that you are refusing to fight, and they have given you enough opportunity to fix it without saying.
Why do we need to send a message to the Naxals and NE Rebels ? We are systematically choking them like a python. Their area of effect/influence has systematically shrunk by many-folds in the last 20 years.
First rule of engineering/real life : Dont try to fix what works.
We dont need to send any message to the Naxals and NE rebels via kashmir policy. We have already sent them the message that they will be systematically choked to death like a python squeezes its prey dead.
The difference between IRA/Israel-USA isnt that UK did randee-rona of how everything is normal. USA and israel do that too- they LITERALLY go on tv telling terrorsts have no impact, tourism same same.
The difference is, UK did nothing to go after the IRA.
USA/Israel does the whole 'everything naarmaal saar' and then goes and bombs the terrorists to bits.
We are refusing to fight Islam currently. At least directly. Because we do not have the power to do so.
No one fights islam directly except China. Because everyone else is missing one of two vital component to fight islam : ability to project economic + military power over islam ( west +China has this) AND the ability of the awaam to take losses if needed in a fight ( China has this, west does not).
As a result, ONLY China can make official state policy of 'islam is a mental illness, we need re-education camps for muslims' and open declare war against islam.
We cannot because we lack BOTH the capabilities currently. remember, fighting islam is a total war. and the overton window + economic power of hindus does not match for that policy yet.
The first rule of fighting is never to pick a fight you arent sure of winning. And we arent sure of winning this one yet.