Pahalgam Islamic Terror Attack

Mail-SPL-468-X60-2x

Do you think a Military response going to happen?.


  • Total voters
    218
Status
Not open for further replies.
Just Hope that Munir doesn't kick Mudi ji again by striking across LOC while Mudi is dreaming about scaring Pakistan with endless meetings ..

Actually, I hope Porkies do something retarded to force our hand. I don't believe Modi wants to act.
 
It also takes a lot of money and fuel does Pakistan have either??
If we are going to trick paxtan by raising the cost then we have to reciprocate the deployment and hype the buildups as they do. The more resources we fuel in it is gonna create a lot of internal pressure in paxtan.
 
That requires balls. If he did attack, then I would have to give it to him. But I don't think he will cuz pakis lack balls. All of them Hijras.

Reminder if they had cojones necessary, they wouldn't be chanting "death by a thousand cuts" and engaging in saste jihadi in Cashmeer, it would be direct invasions and attacks as it was in the past.

Push comes to shove, India can do much more damage to their entire conventional capability than they can do to India's.

It's just that the Indian leedorship gives too much priority to ekanami and dhandho and is scared of war and "escalation"
 
Actually, I hope Porkies do something retarded to force our hand. I don't believe Modi wants to act.
Kya force your ..force your hand.. Is India covering own ass to save itself.. forcing India's hand.. ? That is what happened in Kargil..
 
Kya force your ..force your hand.. Is India covering own ass to save itself.. forcing India's hand.. ? That is what happened in Kargil..

Modi is just playing meeting meeting. He wants this to blow over.

The Indian public, particularly Hindus vote for those that hates them for freebies, you think this public is willing to face a sustained war?
 
I have a a proposition.

Whoever will become pm of India. He needs to a bully. Especially in geopolitics.

He needs to do the Aman ka tamasha while keeping dagger ready to strike when pakis are distracted. He needs to provoke pakis by territorial annexation. He needs to be hyper aggressive towards pakis. And doesn't leave any chance not to humiliate pakis when he wants to.

He also needs to be a bully with respect to the 0.5 front as well. Meet and greet and praise them just before putting them in jail on whatever offenses they have done.

So he needs to be a bully.
 
Hijras attacked across LOC and occupied land in 1999.. but Indian Army didn't ....

They inserted their soldiers as "freedumb fighters" in thrashmeer, didn't even accept the bodies of their own troops, a very manly qaum indeed, they "occupied land" but were booted out. :bplease:

Yes, the are hijdas and failures in my book, perhaps as a green you can't believe this but that's on you.
 
Nahi hoga, pre-emptive strike in their context is like being a 5'6 runt and slapping a 6'2 beefcake guy, sure his cheek may become red, but it won't be good what happens after to the runt.
Why not . If the maximum that you do is push the smaller guy out of your Compound/Fence and not occupy his own area, or devastate his compound / Body . He will keep trying to hit you, thinking that he may end up being lucky for once by hitting you in the nuts .
 
They inserted their soldiers as "freedumb fighters" in thrashmeer, didn't even accept the bodies of their own troops, a very manly qaum indeed, they "occupied land" but were booted out. :bplease:

Yes, the are hijdas and failures in my book, perhaps as a green you can't believe this but that's on you.
You want that to happen again.. try to boot them out of our own land.. while India is not man enough to occupy part of POK..
 
You want that to happen again.. try to boot them out of our own land.. while India is not man enough to occupy part of POK..

Is Pakistan mard -e- momin enough to occupy Kashmir ;)

Is it mard -e- momeen enough to liberate it's allegedly oppressed green brozzers and sistahs from Indian "tyranny"?
Does it have the mardangi necessary to stop India from fondling it's "jugular vein" since 1947? :bplease:

This is the country that begs all it's sugar daddies to make "Endia talk to us on Kashmir", it's barely >talk now, earlier their tantrums were about asking their foreign abbus to make India >give them Kashmir

Our dhandho and ekanami addicted cowards have their problems, but it's better not to dick glaze and ball lift the piglets like y'all are doing.
 
They just want to be good boys and girls and stay out of 'dirty' politics.

What happened to Modi's much vaunted diplomacy with Islamic nations?


View: https://x.com/MeghUpdates/status/1919640331672297789?t=TDDYY1lCoorMav41Bjfekg&s=19

They are really an invisible community politically clueless in every way about how politics work.they can fight among their own community but become sheep in the broader picture. Just look at India in the UN largest nation in the world and no UNSC. Legacy of colonialism and slavery from the past.
India only Nation that did not get UNSC seat being part of the ww2 victors.
 
Last edited:
Correct analysis but our leedors are too risk-averse to take the plunge.
Let alone take the plunge now, they are too cheap and foolish to even build up the armed forces' equipment with a generous defense budget overtime to have a overwhelming response to terror attacks like this
I understand and agree with your point; however, my primary focus is to begin venturing out and showcasing our capabilities. We are capable of sustaining long and costly expeditions. Let us take a measured step to develop a new logistical framework that ensures our forces are ready to act within 48 hours, with a clear objective that can be followed by proper mobilisation. This was the essence of the Cold Start Doctrine, which was overshadowed by its own hype. Perhaps a different name would have helped. Nomenclature matters.

Whether it was deploying boots on the ground in Afghanistan, enforcing our authority in southern Nepal, extending our operational reach in Burma to restore democracy, capturing Sri Lanka’s northern peninsula, or asserting influence in the Maldives, we have remained restrained.

The IPKF setback was not catastrophic, but our risk aversion and fear of negative press fundamentally altered our approach. What haunted us more was the involvement of a third party. Instead of learning from the experience and improving, we abandoned that doctrine entirely. In the U.S., they call it “body bag syndrome,” a term we’ve also adopted. Many do not know that this contributed to the assassination of our former Prime Minister, driven by misplaced guilt.


Most of our troubles in the neighbourhood stem from our predictability, as we are seen as unwilling to wield hard power.

This may indeed be a capability issue. Take the Kandahar hijacking: once the plane left our territory, we lacked the means to rescue the hostages. Post-Kandahar, we further erred by not debriefing passengers and shaping a narrative that supported our story. It is shameful that a nation victimised by Islamic terrorism was portrayed as the villain later on.

Analysts blame individuals, but the real fault lies with the government, which possesses vast resources but lacks the vision or resolve to pursue broader objectives; what I call the Hindu Rashtra Lens or Akhand Bharat Lens.

Be the constitutional democracy the way you want and keep bowing down to the constitution, but for god sake, have an ideological foundation in Akhand Bharat to guide your Hard Power.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
VPN-HSL-468-X60-2x

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top