Russian Ukrainian War (4 Viewers)

[Akim]

I am not discussing conspiracy theories. There are facts and Korean MLRS is one of them. This is certainly much better than the homemade MLRS from ship mortars that were made last year.
Western intelligence claims that Russia has 700 Iskander-M missiles and only 60 KN-23 missiles. However, on the second night of "revenge", Ukraine was shelled with North Korean missiles, because the numbers do not match reality.
More and more NK weapons, starting with machine guns, appear in the Russian army. So Russia's deception is visible here.

By the way, who saw the Bradley trophy with 2A72. There are no Western ammunition.

 

[WW2historian]

I am not discussing conspiracy theories. There are facts and Korean MLRS is one of them. This is certainly much better than the homemade MLRS from ship mortars that were made last year.
Western intelligence claims that Russia has 700 Iskander-M missiles and only 60 KN-23 missiles. However, on the second night of "revenge", Ukraine was shelled with North Korean missiles, because the numbers do not match reality.
More and more NK weapons, starting with machine guns, appear in the Russian army. So Russia's deception is visible here.

By the way, who saw the Bradley trophy with 2A72. There are no Western ammunition.
View attachment 39424

So what if Russia is using N. Korean weapons? Is it a negative that Ukraine uses western weapons? Nope, it's the exact opposite, but for some reason it's a bad thing that N. Korea is supplying Russia.

 

[neelaslayer]

Friendly fire by russian pilots in su25

View: https://x.com/wartranslated/status/1933548320443806075?t=HCqqUoTcvKuIgsDHSeOW3Q&s=19

 

[Akim]

So what if Russia is using N. Korean weapons? Is it a negative that Ukraine uses western weapons? Nope, it's the exact opposite, but for some reason it's a bad thing that N. Korea is supplying Russia.

I don't remember the US buying weapons from Brazil during the Vietnam War. What about the status?
This is one of the reasons why Hitler attacked the USSR. After the Finnish War, he realized that the Red Army's strength was only drawn on paper.

 

[neelaslayer]

Fpv of russia.


View: https://x.com/GrandpaRoy2/status/1933561514507841665?t=37-9mYQ3p1T4Or3uAMybvg&s=19

 

[WW2historian]

I don't remember the US buying weapons from Brazil during the Vietnam War. What about the status?
This is one of the reasons why Hitler attacked the USSR. After the Finnish War, he realized that the Red Army's strength was only drawn on paper.

I wonder what Hitler realized 4 years latter, what went though his head, other then that bullet? Lindsey Graham is talking shit again, saying the Putin won't stop after Ukraine. Interesting isn't it? I agree with part of what he said, Putin will take Ukraine just like Graham said, but he will then stop.
View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/CQ3fiXa0Bh0

 

[Akim]

I wonder what Hitler realized 4 years latter, what went though his head, other then that bullet? Lindsey Graham is talking shit again, saying the Putin won't stop after Ukraine. Interesting isn't it? I agree with part of what he said, Putin will take Ukraine just like Graham said, but he will then stop.
View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/CQ3fiXa0Bh0

I'm not interested in trying to convince you otherwise, but if it weren't for the weapons from Britain, the USSR could have lost the war back in 1941. Back then, Britain was defending its interests: it couldn't allow the Reich and the USSR to unite, just as it can't allow Ukraine and Russia to merge now. Your American opinion is equal to shit. The US has always had a poor understanding of Europe's problems.

 

[neelaslayer]

American price Goulding selling and charging switchblades for hundreds of thousands of usd from europe but it's just cost around 10 to 20 thousand usd.

View: https://x.com/GrandpaRoy2/status/1933597060022088008?t=HyTQXrB75d7qqLQPXHSqKQ&s=19

 

[WW2historian]

I'm not interested in trying to convince you otherwise, but if it weren't for the weapons from Britain, the USSR could have lost the war back in 1941. Back then, Britain was defending its interests: it couldn't allow the Reich and the USSR to unite, just as it can't allow Ukraine and Russia to merge now. Your American opinion is equal to shit. The US has always had a poor understanding of Europe's problems.

The Germans forgot about Russian winters. Ironic that they didn't learn from Napoleon's failure. I understand Europe. Every European country switches sides when it serves their interests, but they never look at the long term. Britain and Germany (Prussia) united against France, the France and Britain unite against Germany, and so on, and so on, I could go on forever. I think Europeans love to suffer, they've mastered that art to perfection.

 

[Corvus Splendens]

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/1laiq8v/russian_su25_shot_down_in_ukraine_today/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

 

[craigs]

After the Finnish War, he realized that the Red Army's strength was only drawn on paper.

And just before he blew his own brains out he came to another realization. Hehehehehejeje

 

[craigs]

I don't remember the US buying weapons from Brazil during the Vietnam War.

I didnt know you handled defence procurement for US during Vietnam War.

 

[neelaslayer]

View: https://x.com/bayraktar_1love/status/1933581384536232269?t=bQZzeLA6cFLs-xWREXSYbg&s=19

 

[Akim]

The Germans forgot about Russian winters. Ironic that they didn't learn from Napoleon's failure. I understand Europe. Every European country switches sides when it serves their interests, but they never look at the long term. Britain and Germany (Prussia) united against France, the France and Britain unite against Germany, and so on, and so on, I could go on forever. I think Europeans love to suffer, they've mastered that art to perfection.

This is a myth about "harsh Russian winters" as an assistant. The war was fought in the European part of the USSR and winters there are not as harsh as beyond the Ural Mountains.
I showed a map of March 1918. The Germans were near Pskov and winter did not prevent them from advancing.
Of course, winter itself creates discomfort for any side. On the Internet you will find many photos of frozen Soviet equipment and Red Army soldiers during the Finnish War.
P.S. My grandfather also took part in the Finnish War.

 

[WW2historian]

This is a myth about "harsh Russian winters" as an assistant. The war was fought in the European part of the USSR and winters there are not as harsh as beyond the Ural Mountains.
I showed a map of March 1918. The Germans were near Pskov and winter did not prevent them from advancing.
Of course, winter itself creates discomfort for any side. On the Internet you will find many photos of frozen Soviet equipment and Red Army soldiers during the Finnish War.
P.S. My grandfather also took part in the Finnish War.
View attachment 39537

Ignore these pictures, they're as fake as a picture of the mythical Minitour. Once again Akim makes an illogical comparison. There were virtually no tanks or motorized vehicles in WWI. German tanks during the coldest days did not start because of the cold weather. I should've just mentioned the "weather" instead of the winter, because before it froze German tanks got stuck in the mud. Latter they got stuck in the snow. The Germans didn't have proper clothing, because they thought it would be over in 3 months. The evidence is overwhelming. If anything the weather should have played less of part "IF" the Germans prepared well, but there were fucking stupid Nazis running thing, just like the stupid Nazis running Ukraine now. Like I said a broken clock is correct more than you are. https://histclo.com/essay/war/ww2/camp/eur/ger/bar/weath/bcw-wint.html

 

[Akim]

Ignore these pictures, they're as fake as a picture of the mythical Minitour. Once again Akim makes an illogical comparison. There were virtually no tanks or motorized vehicles in WWI. German tanks during the coldest days did not start because of the cold weather. I should've just mentioned the "weather" instead of the winter, because before it froze German tanks got stuck in the mud. Latter they got stuck in the snow. The Germans didn't have proper clothing, because they thought it would be over in 3 months. The evidence is overwhelming. If anything the weather should have played less of part "IF" the Germans prepared well, but there were fucking stupid Nazis running thing, just like the stupid Nazis running Ukraine now. Like I said a broken clock is correct more than you are. https://histclo.com/essay/war/ww2/camp/eur/ger/bar/weath/bcw-wint.html View attachment 39606View attachment 39605

You are such a darned condom! You know that Ukrainian Nazism is Kremlin nonsense.
Europe does not believe you or Trump about Russia's modest appetites and is rearming.
You have shit in your head. Mud and frost had the same effect on German and Soviet tanks. By June 22, 1941, there were 15 thousand tanks in the European part of the USSR (there were 23 thousand tanks in the USSR in total), but for some reason Odessa was defended by armored tractors, although only 1.5 months had passed since the beginning of that war.
By November 1941, only 343/346 Soviet tanks remained, although you were spoon-fed with a pseudo-history that the largest tank battle was in 1943 near Kursk.
Indeed, the Germans had problems with winter uniforms, but they had not yet established logistics. Why did the Red Army soldiers wear Budenovkas in the winter of 1939, but then made a copy of the Finnish winter hat.
So it was not the weather that affected the course of the war, but the mismatch of desires and possibilities.
Putler also wanted to capture all of Ukraine in 1.5 months, but strategically he did not advance anywhere.

 

[neelaslayer]

View: https://x.com/GrandpaRoy2/status/1933870786634490201?t=xlqVz05xmBjpWc99CA9-wA&s=19

 

[WW2historian]

You are such a darned condom! You know that Ukrainian Nazism is Kremlin nonsense.
Europe does not believe you or Trump about Russia's modest appetites and is rearming.
You have shit in your head. Mud and frost had the same effect on German and Soviet tanks. By June 22, 1941, there were 15 thousand tanks in the European part of the USSR (there were 23 thousand tanks in the USSR in total), but for some reason Odessa was defended by armored tractors, although only 1.5 months had passed since the beginning of that war.
By November 1941, only 343/346 Soviet tanks remained, although you were spoon-fed with a pseudo-history that the largest tank battle was in 1943 near Kursk.
Indeed, the Germans had problems with winter uniforms, but they had not yet established logistics. Why did the Red Army soldiers wear Budenovkas in the winter of 1939, but then made a copy of the Finnish winter hat.
So it was not the weather that affected the course of the war, but the mismatch of desires and possibilities.
Putler also wanted to capture all of Ukraine in 1.5 months, but strategically he did not advance anywhere.
View attachment 39624

After the Nazi's burned 40 Russians to death in Odessa I knew Ukraine was lead by Nazi right wing nationalist. Also the Nazi Stephen Bandara being made a national hero of Ukraine was icing on the cake.
"On 22 January 2010, Viktor Yushchenko, the president of Ukraine, awarded Bandera the posthumous title of Hero of Ukraine, which was widely condemned. The award was annulled in 2011 given that Stepan Bandera was never a Ukrainian citizen."

War is huge money and it's been proven that if there is no threat you must create one to justify the spending of trillions of dollars. Europe is just creating a false threat that Russia will invade after defeating Ukraine. Even if Russia defeated NATO (a near impossibility) and took over the Baltics and Poland, how do they maintain these conquered territories over time? It's impossible, and Putin knows this. That's why he said anyone that wants the old Soviet Union back doesn't have a brain. Why waste trillions of dollars and millions of lives for the impossible.

Akim you're just plain stupid. Russia will take over Odessa and then will have will have the not so easy task of maintaining their gains in Ukraine for years. If they attack NATO they risk everything for nothing, because the impossible is the same as nothing. And losing everything is everything.

​

 

[Akim]

Capture Odesa - dreams, dreams...
I was talking about the 140-mm NK mortar. Our answer is a 160mm mortar.

 

[neelaslayer]

View: https://x.com/GrandpaRoy2/status/1933926494134538566?t=sQzl8RzdsfREyWtivFNrCg&s=19