- Joined
- Jul 2, 2024
- Messages
- 279
- Likes
- 537
We had, but it was so cheaper to produce in Taiwan, Vietnam, China... that this industry nearly collapse.May I ask the reason France doesn't have a semi conductor fab
We had, but it was so cheaper to produce in Taiwan, Vietnam, China... that this industry nearly collapse.May I ask the reason France doesn't have a semi conductor fab
The already have Thales for exemple, that study and produce some very specific cards (as in all the french radars). Also BULL,...Supposing tomorrow the government decided you need to get into the SMC space in a big way & in keeping with France's stated policy on sovereignty do everything in house , how long do you think you'd take to accomplish it particularly when the industrial depth & scientific achievements of France in this field has not been anything significant.
FCAS engine is, so far, in the 125KN range...Safran Says New 110kN Engine for AMCA, Independent of M-88 Technology.
Actually if JV delivers engine, then they should work on family of Engines. It shall even make more sense for Dassault to open Aviation Company here in alliance with HAL or Tata or Bharat Forge(B737/A320 alternative) or Dynamatics Pvt Ltd or L&T to jointly work on Next gen Strategic/Tactical Airlifter and Civilan Airline. This should give nice Civilian Airlines monopoly to Dassault next venture in Indian Subcontinent. If they succeed in India - they shall get good market in Africa and South America too.FCAS engine is, so far, in the 125KN range...
110 KN or 125 KN : very similar engines?
M88 is mainly optimised for air to ground support, when EJ200 (or M53) is mainly for air to air missions (but all two can do the rest, but with less efficiency).
AMCA and FCAS will focus on air superiority so not specially the M88 config.
And to add. They are aiming low with 110. When AMCA comes online, they thing things they would need to integrate with AMCA - shall make 110 kn again underpowered. 125kn and 130kn would be ideal power ranges they are targeting with AMCA Mk2FCAS engine is, so far, in the 125KN range...
110 KN or 125 KN : very similar engines?
M88 is mainly optimised for air to ground support, when EJ200 (or M53) is mainly for air to air missions (but all two can do the rest, but with less efficiency).
AMCA and FCAS will focus on air superiority so not specially the M88 config.
Exactly with modern more advanced and more powerhungry avionics more power will be welcomedAnd to add. They are aiming low with 110. When AMCA comes online, they thing things they would need to integrate with AMCA - shall make 110 kn again underpowered. 125kn and 130kn would be ideal power ranges they are targeting with AMCA Mk2
I think this next gen fighter engine will be studied with 2 or 3 differents thrust class.And to add. They are aiming low with 110. When AMCA comes online, they thing things they would need to integrate with AMCA - shall make 110 kn again underpowered. 125kn and 130kn would be ideal power ranges they are targeting with AMCA Mk2
And to add. They are aiming low with 110. When AMCA comes online, they thing things they would need to integrate with AMCA - shall make 110 kn again underpowered. 125kn and 130kn would be ideal power ranges they are targeting with AMCA Mk2
What if laser pods / more powerful anti stealth radar/ more powerful ECM/ECCM become new rage in future - which define jet age of that era - requiring more powerful engines? You are just thinking like LCA designers in 80's - 90s who could not anticipate 2000's. Always have good margins for future add ons.Not really. 110kn is sufficient to supercruise and provide ample power for electric devices. Infact f414 might itself allow limited supercruise.
F35 has mtow of 30ton and engine thrust with ab is 190KN.
Amca is targeting mtow of 27 ton with 220Kn thrust with definative engine.
Even with f414 it will have much better twr compare to f35.
What if laser pods / more powerful anti stealth radar/ more powerful ECM/ECCM become new rage in future - which define jet age of that era - requiring more powerful engines? You are just thinking like LCA designers in 80's - 90s who could not anticipate 2000's. Always have good margins for future add ons.
knowing how indian aviation past was and you can easily predict how next 20 years are going to be , I hope more focus is on AMCA and derivatives. Have an engine design which has growth potential to cater for future needs. In aviation, you always design engine first and then aircrafts around it. So better have engine roadmap which results in actual pulava than khyali pulavaFuture challenges will keep evolving but while designing you need to come at an optimal compromise. More power for engine comes at a cost. You will need bigger intakes bigger dimensions and more fuel consumption will reduce combat range significantly.
Anyways whatever extra is required will be supplied by drones alongside amca. Drones are the future or air warfare and they will argument manned fighter with whatever is lacking on battlefield. Hence focus on mumt.
Besides we will be designing bigger jets than Amca for future requirements. We are almost done with mwf design and it will be rolled out soon. Tedbf design will be over before 2030.
Then we will start designing post Amca jet which will most likely be space - edge fighter ( probably unmanned) and will need much bigger engines.
knowing how indian aviation past was and you can easily predict how next 20 years are going to be , I hope more focus is on AMCA and derivatives. Have an engine design which has growth potential to cater for future needs. In aviation, you always design engine first and then aircrafts around it. So better have engine roadmap which results in actual pulava than khyali pulava
GTRE Director - 18:40 onwards
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4OIUB1GCMg
- Unsuccessfully "begging" people to get timeslots for the high-altitude test beds and flying test beds, probably in Russia.
- No 50K hydraulic press.
- Only spent $250 million when 10 times the amount is needed - $2.5 billion.
- URGENTLY NEEDED - A coordinated national mission for aero-engines involving all stakeholders(and that probably would mean IAF not just sitting and ordering fighters and aero-engines like biryani in a restaurant. They need to be more proactively involved in making said biryani - maybe even earmarking part of their funds for R&D; exactly like responsible forces like USAF and USN do)
- Need for more skilled manpower. He implies a 'Dutch Disease' phenomenon in India, where graduates are going to IT instead of deep tech in MTech.
GTRE Director - 18:40 onwards
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4OIUB1GCMg
- Unsuccessfully "begging" people to get timeslots for the high-altitude test beds and flying test beds, probably in Russia.
- No 50K hydraulic press.
- Only spent $250 million when 10 times the amount is needed - $2.5 billion.
- URGENTLY NEEDED - A coordinated national mission for aero-engines involving all stakeholders(and that probably would mean IAF not just sitting and ordering fighters and aero-engines like biryani in a restaurant. They need to be more proactively involved in making said biryani - maybe even earmarking part of their funds for R&D; exactly like responsible forces like USAF and USN do)
- Need for more skilled manpower. He implies a 'Dutch Disease' phenomenon in India, where graduates are going to IT instead of deep tech in MTech.
Y'all know that Boeing Offset clause to build Wind Tunnel Test Facility is shot down by US Congress. That's merely for Wind Tunnel, now imagine what's gonna happen to something as crucial as Jet Engines Flying Test bed. Also Airbus is getting too much leeway here. Should have given all that orders to Boeing. Airbus is very reclusive and doesn't engage Indian Vendors as much as Boeing.We are the largest customer country for both Airbus & Boeing by a large margin but can't afford a single flying test bed?
Issue of no funds saaar, budget constrains saaaar are long gone. It is now pure sabotage to keep foreign maal pipeline flowing
Yes, full sabotag going on. I dont know why PMO not looking into this.We are the largest customer country for both Airbus & Boeing by a large margin but can't afford a single flying test bed?
Issue of no funds saaar, budget constrains saaaar are long gone. It is now pure sabotage to keep foreign maal pipeline flowing
GTRE Director - 18:40 onwards
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4OIUB1GCMg
- Unsuccessfully "begging" people to get timeslots for the high-altitude test beds and flying test beds, probably in Russia.
- No 50K hydraulic press.
- Only spent $250 million when 10 times the amount is needed - $2.5 billion.
- URGENTLY NEEDED - A coordinated national mission for aero-engines involving all stakeholders(and that probably would mean IAF not just sitting and ordering fighters and aero-engines like biryani in a restaurant. They need to be more proactively involved in making said biryani - maybe even earmarking part of their funds for R&D; exactly like responsible forces like USAF and USN do)
- Need for more skilled manpower. He implies a 'Dutch Disease' phenomenon in India, where graduates are going to IT instead of deep tech in MTech.