- Joined
- Jun 27, 2024
- Messages
- 1,088
- Likes
- 4,720
I had quite the same kind of observation but I had to reorganize my perspective because ours is a view of the city dweller.How does one account for migrant population or illegal immigrants apart from over & under reporting?
I believe whatever figure the census throws up we need to add a factor of error of +/- 10% . In case of the peacefuls it should always be + 10% by default . Why?
Friends in my age group among non peacefuls have as a rule a 1 child policy. Sometimes it's no children. Whereas for peacefuls it is 2-3 with the latter number ruling.
And these guys themselves came from large families with each of them having on an average 5-6 siblings.
So yes, it's true their TFR is dropping but it's in a healthy way whilst ours is in an alarming manner. Once again this is based on anecdotal experience subject to the time space dynamic.
I used to talk to my father and he would say this city(Patna) is full of Muslims, this area has lot of muslim that area has lot of Muslims and than it seemed to me like they were indeed growing very fast.
But............
Muslims are more city centric for some reason.
Here is the data.
This is specially true at least in bihar because many during the 1945-47 riots were forced to flee either to Paksitan/Bangladesh or to the city.
This was the case of my ancestral area where pre 1945 we had two muslim villages in our Panchayat which later they abandoned to go live in city, their empty and rotting mosque is still there.
Hindus in city have less children, Muslims in city have a bit more children and hindu in rural areas have as much children as Muslims in city while whatever little Muslims there are in rural have a bit more children than Rural Hindus.
Last edited: