DRDO and PSU's

Azaad said:
www.businessinsider.com

The US Navy sacked a destroyer captain after a persistent steering problem led to a Middle East near-miss

The commanding officer wasn't fired for looking through the wrong end of a rifle scope, an investigation shows. Here's what really happened.
www.businessinsider.com www.businessinsider.com
Click to expand...

Why is it such a big deal that he has to get fired for it? Mounting a scope backward? Can't believe that it would warrant destroying an illustrious career. I think it was just an convenient excuse to fire him due to political reasons.
 
Blademaster said:
Nice try, Sherlock Holmes. If you cannot deal with the recoil, your aiming and guidance is gonna be way off.
Click to expand...
Wut!? What's wrong with you my guy!?

It's a freaking rocket. You accelerate a mass m1 (the missile) with a velocity v1 from one end and exhaust gases with mass m2 and velocity v2 from other. As m1>>m2 and v1<<v2 the resulting momentum or kinetic energy whatever way you wanna go (conservation of momentum or energy) cancels each other. This is the reason CGRLs can shoot a 3kg projectile without sending your shoulder to the next district.

Also it's a high off-boresight missile. MISSILE...it guides itself. Even if you shoot it 30° off target it would hit it.
 
Ayan Barat said:
Wut!? What's wrong with you my guy!?

It's a freaking rocket. You accelerate a mass m1 (the missile) with a velocity v1 from one end and exhaust gases with mass m2 and velocity v2 from other. As m1>>m2 and v1<<v2 the resulting momentum or kinetic energy whatever way you wanna go (conservation of momentum or energy) cancels each other. This is the reason CGRLs can shoot a 3kg projectile without sending your shoulder to the next district.

Also it's a high off-boresight missile. MISSILE...it guides itself. Even if you shoot it 30° off target it would hit it.
Click to expand...

No they teach you how to brace yourself and plant your foot in the ground as to manage the recoil and keep your aiming sight on target. You got the mass to deal with the recoil but a drone? It does not have the necessary mass or enough thrust to handle that recoil.
 
Blademaster said:
No they teach you how to brace yourself and plant your foot in the ground as to manage the recoil and keep your aiming sight on target. You got the mass to deal with the recoil but a drone? It does not have the necessary mass or enough thrust to handle that recoil.
Click to expand...
I tried my best to make you understand. Even added class 9th physics, so now just gonna leave this 6 year old video for you

View: https://youtu.be/fg6_k6nBn70?feature=shared
If even this is not enough to convince you then maafi Bhaiya, galti ho gayi
 
Ayan Barat said:
I tried my best to make you understand. Even added class 9th physics, so now just gonna leave this 6 year old video for you

View: https://youtu.be/fg6_k6nBn70?feature=shared
If even this is not enough to convince you then maafi Bhaiya, galti ho gayi
Click to expand...


And I can tell you that they had to lower that power in order to keep the drone stabilized. 9th grade physics would tell you that also.
 
Blademaster said:
And I can tell you that they had to lower that power in order to keep the drone stabilized. 9th grade physics would tell you that also.
Click to expand...
Arre Chacha, kabhi kabhi maan leni chahiye saamnewaale ki baat...chhote thode hi ho jaaoge

Here's a Russian Perun quadcopter launching a full sized 9K111 without lowering any power
perun-1.webp
That's a 12.5kg missile, heavier than the Igla in question
 

View: https://youtu.be/YEV2yYNSFYM?feature=shared
if you order rafale today u will receive first in 5-6 years then by 5 yrs GaAs will be outdated. gaAs will be relevant till 10 yrs only against china.
Gan has very wide band operation and can operate at 5 times more electric input as compared to GaAs. In future engines will be capable of delivering such outputs were GaAs will be competely outdated. Against GaN j20s with there modern engines same goes for future upgraded j16s.
Even forget abt our counterparts

we know how much french upgrades cost they looted us in Mirage upgrade despite not giving an aesa. And here you want to upgrade rafale with in few years of induction. Not a sensible idea neither Dassault want us to put our GaN in rafale nor the moD is clearing tedbf.
So that we don't get a rafale like aircraft almost ready by the time we could receive rafale if ordered today.
we aren't receiving rafales in 5-6yrs and if tedbf would have came and would have made sense for iaf as anyways they aren't getting rafales. So babus are not releasing funds because rafale counterpart would be ready in country. And neither Dassault is making it affordable for us to use our GaN intentionally.
They are such a bigot want to fund there GaN radar development from fcas program where all participants will funds them and then they can derive it for rafale.
Had tedbf been cleared on time it would have clashed with rafale deliveries in future. But then Dassault and corrupt burocrats could loose there malai.
That's why this delays in tedbf funds.

Had tebdf been initiated on time there would have been no need for imported rafales.
(Atleast would have reduced the numbers for now n would have been much affordable to compensate for depliting strength)
Even if today funding is released it can't be ready before first rafale delivery to us if ordered today. But had it began much before we would have had rafale alternative. Can't believe this idea never came to the minds of un genrols, corrupt burocrats.
Politicians are clueless duffers.
With rafale orders booked for next 5-6 years (considering best case scenarios otherwise they are also facing supply chain issues) neither we can go for rafales nor we have any other option.
There was potential to do so many goods but this madarchods genrols & burocrats are so haramkhor. And even now they aren't releasing funds on purpose as rafale deliveries would be long and could be inducted to compensate some number of expensive rafail.

Tedbf's ew would have been matured on rafale but they are charging us an arm n leg. This would have resulted in iaf going for india EW Thales loosing money. That's why they can't afford to let us put our systems our GaN would be ready much before there's and matured and it will be affordable too.
They intentionally hurdled spice 2000 integration so we buy hammer. Bloody madarchods.
 
Last edited:
Satish Sharma Ji said:

View: https://youtu.be/YEV2yYNSFYM?feature=shared
if you order rafale today u will receive first in 5-6 years then by 5 yrs GaAs will be outdated. gaAs will be relevant till 10 yrs only against china.
Gan has very wide band operation and can operate at 5 times more electric input in future engines will be capable of delivering such outputs were GaAs will be competely outdated. Against GaN j20s with there modern engines same goes for future upgraded j16s.
Even forget abt our counterparts

we know how much french upgrades cost they looted us in Mirage upgrade despite not giving an aesa. And here you want to upgrade rafale with in few years of induction. Not a sensible idea neither Dassault want us to put our GaN in rafale nor the moD is clearing tedbf.
So that we don't get a rafale like aircraft almost ready by the time we could receive rafale if ordered today.
we aren't receiving rafales in 5-6yrs and if tedbf would have came and would have made sense for iaf as anyways they aren't getting rafales. So babus are not releasing funds because rafale counterpart would be ready in country. And neither Dassault is making it affordable for us to use our GaN intentionally.
They are such a bigot want to fund there GaN radar development from fcas program where all participants will funds them and then they can derive it for rafale.
Had tedbf been cleared on time it would have clashed with rafale deliveries in future. But then Dassault and corrupt burocrats could loose there malai.
That's why this delays in tedbf funds.

Had tebdf been initiated on time there would have been no need for imported rafales. Even if today funding is released it can't be ready before first rafale delivery to us if ordered today. But had it began much before we would have had rafale alternative. Can't believe this idea never came to the minds of un genrols, corrupt burocrats.
Politicians are clueless duffers.
With rafale orders booked for next 5-6 years (considering best case scenarios otherwise they are also facing supply chain issues) neither we can go for rafales nor we have any other option.
There was potential to do so many goods but this madarchods genrols & burocrats are so haramkhor.

Tedbf's ew would have been matured on rafale but they are charging us a arm n leg. This would have resulted in iaf going for india EW Thales loosing money. That's why they can't afford to let us put our systems our GaN would be ready much before there's and matured and it will be affordable too.
They intentionally hurdled spice 2000 integration so we buy hammer. Bloody madarchods.
Click to expand...

Right now due to production issue and jam packed orders i don't think 5-6 years but atleast minimum 8-10 years by that time we would have tejas mk 2 and "maybe" amca too if hal and mod doesn't fuck up
And stil no update for tedbf
if tedbf is approved it is going to be much better than rafale knowing how expensive Dassault is and due to sub system of amca
 
username unkown said:
Right now due to production issue and jam packed orders i don't think 5-6 years but atleast minimum 8-10 years by that time we would have tejas mk 2 and "maybe" amca too if hal and mod doesn't fuck up
And stil no update for tedbf
if tedbf is approved it is going to be much better than rafale knowing how expensive Dassault is and due to sub system of amca
Click to expand...
Even if we ordered today would it make sense as our counter parts would be having GaN jammers & radars with actually capable engine to exploit them? Even today I doubt that rafale can counter j20. Let alone when it will get what it is supposed to.
And then we will have upgrade them again. Pay for those costly shit which would be new too.
Mirage upgrade was a loot.
 
Satish Sharma Ji said:
Even if we ordered today would it make sense as our counter parts would be having GaN jammers & radars with actually capable engine to exploit them? Even today I doubt that rafale can counter j20. Let alone when it will get what it is supposed to.
Click to expand...
Ukraine war has proved rather than aircraft /any other military equipment in big number and capability to mass produce in house is better than tip of the spear high prized equipment
 
username unkown said:
Ukraine war has proved rather than aircraft /any other military equipment in big number and capability to mass produce in house is better than tip of the spear high prized equipment
Click to expand...

Well not necessarily. If it wasn't for the western electronic warfare, Russia would have done a lot better. Tech do play a major role especially in the electronic warfare spectrum.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Share this Site

Donate via Bitcoin - bc1qpc3h2l430vlfflc8w02t7qlkvltagt2y4k9dc2

qrcode
Back
Top