- Joined
- Jul 2, 2024
- Messages
- 514
- Likes
- 3,402
Agni-P with its MaRV should be the most probable oneIs this some known project or it's some top secret DRDO missile we haven't seen/heard about?
Agni-P with its MaRV should be the most probable oneIs this some known project or it's some top secret DRDO missile we haven't seen/heard about?
I know team it may not be as easy it seems to me...Still when i hear a 3rd rate economy like pakistan is able well manage their military assets tactically as well as strategically against us than blood boils... Thats it...Ye waala dedication chahiye.
View attachment 14849
Seems like this toxic relationship between our esteemed member @superpower & beloved genrols is never going to end.
Nope, it's a new design altogether.Agni-P with its MaRV should be the most probable one
This missile can be launched from warships, so it's not Agni-P variantAgni-P with its MaRV should be the most probable one
Vertical launch??This missile can be launched from warships, so it's not Agni-P variant
It's LRAshM, a quasi ballistic anti-ship missile. It will feature a hypersonic glide vehicle.Agni-P with its MaRV should be the most probable one
Nope, it's a new design altogether.
This missile can be launched from warships, so it's not Agni-P variant
Okay...so it's not an Agni-P because it'll simply be too big for a ship to fire.It's LRAshM, a quasi ballistic anti-ship missile. It will feature a hypersonic glide vehicle.
GoddammitBut for Vishakhapatnam it's 17.4m and 6.5m. So the best way to add bigger missile is to simply store them horizontally and erect them before launching.
You are right, with a dia of 1.4m & length of 14m, it looks like a K-4 derivative,not A-1P ,if so then it should have a range of 2000-3000km.Okay...so it's not an Agni-P because it'll simply be too big for a ship to fire.
Thanks everyone for correcting, I guess I've become too lazy to open links
Anyways, but if it's indeed LRAShM then isn't that also too big for ship based firing?
View attachment 14905
The height of 14m would be more than double of the draft of Vishakhapatnam; 6.5m
Or did DRDO guys just copy my idea without paying any royalties
Goddammit
Hope it has a HGV warhead?You are right, with a dia of 1.4m & length of 14m, it looks like a K-4 derivative,not A-1P ,if so then it should have a range of 2000-3000km.
India Focuses on Long Range Naval Missiles Development - Naval News
India has multiple anti-ship and land attack naval missiles under development to cater to the diverse needs of the Indian Navy....www.navalnews.com
It's just a MoU that has been signed.India signs deal with Russia for advanced Pantsir variants to boost air defence
The Pantsir air defence system is a highly versatile and mobile platform designed to protect military installations and critical infrastructure from aerial threats, including aircraft, drones, and precision-guided munitions.www.indiatoday.in
The tragedy that is Indian defence. I'm sure most if not all these components are locally available. All we need is a system integrator which BEL can be instead of being a partner in a JV.
I know itsy merely an MoU . However my point remains.It's just a MoU that has been signed.
Journalists don't have the required bare minimum IQ needed to differentiate between a MoU and an actual contract.
India signs deal with Russia for advanced Pantsir variants to boost air defence
The Pantsir air defence system is a highly versatile and mobile platform designed to protect military installations and critical infrastructure from aerial threats, including aircraft, drones, and precision-guided munitions.www.indiatoday.in
The tragedy that is Indian defence. I'm sure most if not all these components are locally available. All we need is a system integrator which BEL can be instead of being a partner in a JV.
I know itsy merely an MoU . However my point remains.
It's just a case of sour grapes, mate.There's a lot of online discussion, particularly among Americans, suggesting that stealthy subsonic cruise missiles are superior to their supersonic counterparts. The main argument is that the stealthy missiles are nearly invisible to radar. However, this thinking seems outdated, possibly stemming from past encounters with Soviet-era ships that had inferior electronics. It doesn't account for the fact that many Tier-2 navies now, aside from the massive PLAN, deploy advanced GaN AESA radars. Why assume that evading radar will be easy? And aside from radar, what about electro-optical (EO) sensors, which can track sea-skimming missiles by detecting the heat signature? Even stealthy missiles can't completely hide their thermal footprint, unless one assumes EO sensors are ineffective in other countries' systems.