DRDO and PSU's

Man, I am missing all those pics which were behind Ninda Turtle. Public is not having access of those?
 
Here, K-series stands for Kalam series not Kali.

K for Kalam 🖊 too isn't official.....


Khangress bsdk media circulated : 🤣
A for Apple
B for Ball
C for Cat
K for Kalam


Kalam ji was alive in 2009 when Khangresd media started this shit show....no way we naming series of strategic missiles even when the person is alive....even Kalam ji wouldn't allow that.....

K for KAALI Maa is fine to use
 
What is the possibility that mbda may offer local assembly of meteor missile .

View: https://x.com/livefist/status/1896828132411458006?t=B5whB0Ioxih3PgI1iBu0OA&s=19

Hopefully our dhakkan genrols won't fall into this.

Bhai jinx na Kar yaar.
But atleast in missile tech, orders of indigenous missiles are being given, plus attitude of current air cheif is more supportive of Indigenious systems.
With that Said, possibility does exist of local meteor being in service along with gandhiv for more production lines.
 
What is the possibility that mbda may offer local assembly of meteor missile .

View: https://x.com/livefist/status/1896828132411458006?t=B5whB0Ioxih3PgI1iBu0OA&s=19

Hopefully our dhakkan genrols won't fall into this.

Bhai jinx na Kar yaar.
But atleast in missile tech, orders of indigenous missiles are being given, plus attitude of current air cheif is more supportive of Indigenious systems.
With that Said, possibility does exist of local meteor being in service along with gandhiv for more production lines.
Next to zero chance the French will permit local assembly of Meteor leave aside local mfg . It's part of their crown jewels. We don't need to mfg or assemble it too .

We've the Brahmos . In between there was a proposal by BAPL offering the Brahmos NG (?) for an air to air role. IAF didn't offer any response.

Well now the Chinese are claiming successful tests of a long range 1000 km hypersonic air to air missile , their answer to combat 5th Gen VLO FA of the US & their allies.

Hopefully , the IAF will wake up now .
 
When are they putting this on ship? Its like years they have been testing this. Looks like the import gravytrain of MFSTAR will run again with P-17B.

Most likely P18 destroyer will have it, the radar is pretty large in size.
Or rather MF-STAR will be too small and low range for a large 10k ton+ "destroyer"

1741078218929.webp
 
Next to zero chance the French will permit local assembly of Meteor leave aside local mfg . It's part of their crown jewels. We don't need to mfg or assemble it too .

We've the Brahmos . In between there was a proposal by BAPL offering the Brahmos NG (?) for an air to air role. IAF didn't offer any response.

Well now the Chinese are claiming successful tests of a long range 1000 km hypersonic air to air missile , their answer to combat 5th Gen VLO FA of the US & their allies.

Hopefully , the IAF will wake up now .
That 1000km long range air to air of chinese, is for us bombers are b51 stratofortress, awacs and tankers.
It's not meant for fighter jets.
The new 1000km missiles provides an land based strike capability against large american subsonic planes to compliment air launched missiles like pl17.

That 1000km is not capable to attack fighter jets.
Brahmos ng if modified for air to air role, would do similar role against chinese awacs, tankers etc


That 1000km missile can potentially also target stealth bombers, if chinese detected the bomber using long range L band radars and find out the destination and traget of bomber and send this missile to that location.
 
Next to zero chance the French will permit local assembly of Meteor leave aside local mfg . It's part of their crown jewels. We don't need to mfg or assemble it too .

We've the Brahmos . In between there was a proposal by BAPL offering the Brahmos NG (?) for an air to air role. IAF didn't offer any response.

Well now the Chinese are claiming successful tests of a long range 1000 km hypersonic air to air missile , their answer to combat 5th Gen VLO FA of the US & their allies.

Hopefully , the IAF will wake up now .
If astra mk3 enters service, than France won't have much problem with local assembly or even manufacturing of Meteor, as we would already have the tech.
@BON PLAN, your opinion?
 
That 1000km long range air to air of chinese, is for us bombers are b51 stratofortress, awacs and tankers.
It's not meant for fighter jets.
The new 1000km missiles provides an land based strike capability against large american subsonic planes to compliment air launched missiles like pl17.

That 1000km is not capable to attack fighter jets.
Brahmos ng if modified for air to air role, would do similar role against chinese awacs, tankers etc


That 1000km missile can potentially also target stealth bombers, if chinese detected the bomber using long range L band radars and find out the destination and traget of bomber and send this missile to that location.
Ideally what you're claiming should be the way it ought to be. However SM reports that Chinese sources claim this is for 5th Gen FAs like the F-22 , F-35 & B-21 including B-52 , B-2 , B-1B etc

In any case that's what the Meteor is supposed to undertake viz targetting AWACS , Refuellers , etc
 
Ideally what you're claiming should be the way it ought to be. However SM reports that Chinese sources claim this is for 5th Gen FAs like the F-22 , F-35 & B-21 including B-52 , B-2 , B-1B etc

In any case that's what the Meteor is supposed to undertake viz targetting AWACS , Refuellers , etc
Yeah, no.
No matter what Chinese sources claim, you ain't
( unless very( ×100) fuckin lucky) hitting fighters with this missile.
@Ayan Barat
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top