Failed Terrorist State of Pakistan: Idiotic Musings

shade2 said:
From this particular NGO i too get a lot of ads but mostly it's Arab actors of the "Bray for Balestine" variety, video starts usually with "Blease, do not skib this"
Click to expand...
"Salaam alaykum, we arr live here from gazza, and gazza is not alone, alhumdolillah..." *Skips the ad*
 
1000016109-jpg.12101
 

Attachments

  • 1000016109.jpg
    1000016109.jpg
    179.3 KB · Views: 330
Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapons: Do World Powers Have a Plan for Their Security?

With Pakistan’s economy in severe decline and multiple threats—from the local Pashtun Taliban, the Balochistan independence movement, to ongoing tensions with India—stability appears increasingly elusive. This instability is of global concern, given Pakistan’s possession of approximately 170 nuclear weapons. The combination of internal turmoil and economic degradation heightens the risks surrounding the security of its nuclear arsenal.

The key question is: what happens if Pakistan’s situation deteriorates to the point where the safety of its nuclear weapons is compromised? Currently, the Pakistani Army controls these weapons, but any signs of factionalism within the military could raise serious concerns. Therefore, world powers must have a contingency plan in place to secure these weapons before they fall into the wrong hands.

Pakistan’s nuclear weapons are reportedly kept demated—warheads, fissile material, and delivery systems are stored separately and moved frequently, often in civilian vehicles with minimal security. This creates further cause for concern. The Strategic Plans Division (SPD) is tasked with ensuring the security of these weapons, and while it is known as a highly professional organization, it is not immune to the shifting religious and political currents within the country.

American officials have expressed cautious confidence in the current security of Pakistan’s arsenal, citing improved safeguards and accepting Pakistan’s assurances. However, the Pakistani government has often been reluctant to share detailed information, which adds to the uncertainty.

U.S. concerns about Pakistan’s nuclear security were heightened during the Afghan War and after the operation to eliminate Osama bin Laden in Pakistan. The fear of jihadist groups gaining access to these weapons—whether officially sanctioned or through covert means—has long been a source of anxiety. Significant efforts have been made to ensure Pakistan’s arsenal remains secure, but vulnerabilities persist.

At one point, the U.S. considered sharing aspects of its own nuclear security protocols with Pakistan, but ultimately decided against it, fearing the risk of compromising their own safeguards.

Despite repeated reassurances from Pakistan about the security of its nuclear weapons, unpredictable factors—such as a military coup, a jihadist uprising, or a war with India—could destabilize the situation. The threat is not theoretical: in 1999, during heightened tensions, the Pakistani military leadership threatened India with nuclear war, and only U.S. intervention de-escalated the crisis.

The global landscape today is markedly different from a generation ago. Dormant issues are fueling ongoing conflicts, and as conventional warfare proves ineffective, extremist groups may seek nuclear weapons to shift the balance. While they have been unsuccessful so far, no one can predict how future wars will unfold or what risks lie ahead.

To ensure security and safety, there are only a few effective measures. One is halting the production of U-235, depriving them of critical raw materials. Another is imposing trade restrictions and freezing IMF/World Bank loans vital for economic survival until Pakistan enforces much stricter controls on nuclear weapon deployment. Additionally, new software should be installed to prevent detonation, even if these weapons fall into the wrong hands.

Regardless of the security situation surrounding Pakistan’s nuclear weapons, they cannot be used against India. Pakistan must remember Atal Vajpayee’s warning: ‘while their nukes might destroy 25% of India, in return, all of Pakistan would cease to see the next day’s sunrise’.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

hit&run
Book by Dr Shiv Sastry: Pakistan Failed State:
Replies
0
Views
174
hit&run
hit&run
Satish Sharma Ji
North American puppet state - idiotic musing
Replies
2
Views
252
Satish Sharma Ji
Satish Sharma Ji
AGNI 6 ICBM
  • Poll Poll
Your home state & its tourism,infra
Replies
0
Views
103
AGNI 6 ICBM
AGNI 6 ICBM
fire starter
  • Sticky
Sinking State of Bangladesh: Idiotic Musings
52 53 54
Replies
1K
Views
66K
bong
bong

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Share this Site

Donate via Bitcoin - bc1qpc3h2l430vlfflc8w02t7qlkvltagt2y4k9dc2

qrcode
Back
Top