Failed Terrorist State of Pakistan: Idiotic Musings

As much as I despise these goat shaggers, pakis, in reality, aren't significantly 'overrepresented' when it comes to crimes related to 'child abuses' etc. Pigskin nationalists are conveniently using them as a punching bag just cuz they aren't white (not that I really give a damn; these roaches deserve each other).
Nevertheless nearly 80% of all these grooming gangs are of "South Asian " origin. These statistics are reflected in Home Office records got from convictions. I'd say that's a massive over representation.

Do note these figures only reflect convictions not charges . Then there's the case of gross under reporting which comes with the territory which in this case was exacerbated also because the authorities turned a blind eye or refused to register complaints.

Having said that individual cases of convicted paedophiles is a different matter.
 
Last edited:
Nevertheless nearly 80% of all these grooming gangs are of "South Asian " origin. These statistics are reflected in Home Office records got from convictions. I'd say that's a massive over representation.

Do note these figures only reflect convictions not charges . Then there's the case of gross under reporting which comes with the territory which in this case was exacerbated also because the authorities turned a blind eye or refused to register complaints.

Having said that individual cases of convicted paedophiles is a different matter.

Nah, mate. These white nationalists are engaging in clever wordplay here (depends on how you 'define' grooming etc). It is also why no political party (irrespective of their ideological leanings) is making this an polling issue.
 
Nah, mate. These white nationalists are engaging in clever wordplay here (depends on how you 'define' grooming etc).
How else would you define grooming ?

It is also why no political party (irrespective of their ideological leanings) is making this an polling issue.
They're doing it for some universalism ideal they think is worth upholding like multi culturalism . Then of course there's vote bank politics.
 
How else would you define grooming ?


They're doing it for some universalism ideal they think is worth upholding like multi culturalism . Then of course there's vote bank politics.
I am not saying pakis aren't overrepresented.

A previous piece of research from 2015 found that of 1,231 perpetrators of "group and gang-based child sexual exploitation", 42% were white, 14% were defined as Asian or Asian British and 17% black.

If you consider the broad definition of 'abuses against children' or 'pedophilia' their share goes down even further (to low single digit %).

There was this org who did a study back in 2017 and used some very dodgy statistics to conclude that;

84% of “grooming gang” offenders were South Asian, while they only make up 7% of the total UK population, and that the majority of these offenders are of Pakistani origin with Muslim heritage.

The white nationalists gobbled it up and has not stopped yapping since.
 
Last edited:
I am not saying pakis aren't overrepresented.


If you consider the broad definition of 'abuses against children' or 'pedophilia' their share goes down even further (to low single digit %).

There was this org who did a study back in 2017 and used some very dodgy statistics to conclude that;

I don't get it. On the one hand you're claiming their share in cases of gross paedophile convictions or perhaps charges are exaggerated & on the other hand you're claiming it's based on a dodgy report.
The white nationalists gobbled it up and has not stopped yapping since.
Yes coz just as individual crimes & racketeering like activities also called mafia activities attract different headings under the categorisation of crime therefore a separate set of charges under a separate category of laws , you've similar categorisation in case of individual crimes vs a groomer gang though unfortunately this doesn't have a separate categorisation in laws for differentiation.
 
I am not saying pakis aren't overrepresented.



If you consider the broad definition of 'abuses against children' or 'pedophilia' their share goes down even further (to low single digit %).

There was this org who did a study back in 2017 and used some very dodgy statistics to conclude that;



The white nationalists gobbled it up and has not stopped yapping since.

I don't get it. On the one hand you're claiming their share in cases of gross paedophile convictions or perhaps charges are exaggerated & on the other hand you're claiming it's based on a dodgy report.

Yes coz just as individual crimes & racketeering like activities also called mafia activities attract different headings under the categorisation of crime therefore a separate set of charges under a separate category of laws , you've similar categorisation in case of individual crimes vs a groomer gang though unfortunately this doesn't have a separate categorisation in laws for differentiation.

So the TLDR from this is, whitey pedos go after 12 year old boys.

Paki pedos go after 13 year old girls in groups.


btw per opteeks it's a wide gulf of difference between specifically mentioning Paki Greens as the over-represented demographic vs roping everyone else also in as ((( South Asian )))
 
As much as I despise these goat shaggers, pakis, in reality, aren't significantly 'overrepresented' when it comes to crimes related to 'child abuses' etc. Pigskin nationalists are conveniently using them as a punching bag just cuz they aren't white (not that I really give a damn; these roaches deserve each other).
Have you ever heard of white British men grooming even a single Paki 13 year old girl and gang raping her? Even the most racist entitled whites avoid that level of depravity.

Look at the dysgenic faces all those Pakis in their mugshots. Many have 3-4 kids with the same genes :-(
 
I don't get it. On the one hand you're claiming their share in cases of gross paedophile convictions or perhaps charges are exaggerated & on the other hand you're claiming it's based on a dodgy report.

In case it wasn't clear;

The following is the finding of a study sponsored by the UK home Department;

A previous piece of research from 2015 found that of 1,231 perpetrators of "group and gang-based child sexual exploitation", 42% were white, 14% were defined as Asian or Asian British and 17% black.

The following is the finding of a suvey conducted by a shady foundation (which later got picked up by white nationalists - mostly from abroad);

84% of “grooming gang” offenders were South Asian, while they only make up 7% of the total UK population, and that the majority of these offenders are of Pakistani origin with Muslim heritage.

Excerpts taken from BBCwallahs.


So, yeah. Pakis indeed are overrepresented but definitely not to an extent white nationalists claim them to be.
 
Have you ever heard of white British men grooming even a single Paki 13 year old? Even the most racist entitled whites avoid that level of depravity.

Not that I care about these white nationalists and the pakis fighting each other but I have come across worse;


Nobody beats these pigs when it comes to degeneracy.
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top