Gems of BJP

[shade2]

I can see only 2 reasons why BJP would keep Kanglus in India.

1) To use them as a scare mongering tactic to scare normie Hindus to vote for BJP by showing a bogeyman.

2) Cheap labor.

I don't think the Gujju duo are so shameless to do it due to reason no 1 so I guess it's for cheap labor.

Obviously this applies only if the tweet posted by that Khangressi chamcha is true.

Congressi's graphs don't matter, if you live in any major city of the country you ((( notice ))) the Kanglus everywhere.
>muh statisteeqs isn't necessary to realize that their population has been increasing across the years.

Only after Chunus took over I have seen a drop in Kanglus, perhaps most ran back in fear of being deported or arrested.

Indeed this is anecdotal but since Chunus was installed, I think there are a lot of arrest of kanglus across the country, whether they remain in jail/detention or not pata nahi.

I want them all to be booted out of the country, they breed more than the domestic ones and are a risk to national security because of sabotage activities

If addiction to cheap labour is that bad, atleast eject them from WB and Assam.

 

[johny_baba]

I can see only 2 reasons why BJP would keep Kanglus in India.

1) To use them as a scare mongering tactic to scare normie Hindus to vote for BJP by showing a bogeyman.

2) Cheap labor.

I don't think the Gujju duo are so shameless to do it due to reason no 1 so I guess it's for cheap labor.

Obviously this applies only if the tweet posted by that Khangressi chamcha is true.

there is another reason and it's sinister one, i got it from congressi circles itself on teligram

it's TO KEEP INSURGENCY IN THE NE REGIONS DOWN BY GIVING THEM A COMMON ENEMY - means without kanglu subhumans infiltration giving a constant reason to the indian *ahem* state to keep manpower deployed there, NE regions would have rebelled hard to secede - but these kanglu subhumans *ahem* 'keep them in check and give them compulsory incentive to be part of the union'

 

[Vinash]

there is another reason and it's sinister one, i got it from congressi circles itself on teligram

it's TO KEEP INSURGENCY IN THE NE REGIONS DOWN BY GIVING THEM A COMMON ENEMY - means without kanglu subhumans infiltration giving a constant reason to the indian *ahem* state to keep manpower deployed there, NE regions would have rebelled hard to secede - but these kanglu subhumans *ahem* 'keep them in check and give them compulsory incentive to be part of the union'

Doesn't explain why kanglus must be imported even to deep south if NE is the target.

 

[johny_baba]

Doesn't explain why kanglus must be imported even to deep south if NE is the target.

NE is not the target actually but it's been happening there before the partition, Mr. Nehru himself was responsible for a lot of mess there including pisslamic and ricebag kinds - but congie circles see it as some deterrent to keep NE tribal fanatics in line

pan-india settlement of kanglus started in post indira times when dhandho guys realised potential of cheap labour through them,
rest was settled by IAS bokachodas lobbies on behest of their masters in the indian state, AND GAU TASHKARI IS FACILITATED BY IAS BOKACODAS BECAUSE, just search who're biggest meat and beef dhandho guys in India...not some muslims, but heh, jains...

there was a long post by shri vinay jha ji, comparing how kanglu infiltration in post Indira caused that era of non-majority gathbandhan ki sarkaare by skewing vote games in favours of pissfulls unless Hindus shown mass mobilisations in 2014 and 2019 times breaking that jinx
he even suggested to check the list of most billionaires and their connections with *ahem* tourist agencies that facilitate trips to India, and their relations with IAS bokachodsa lobby

so it's multifaceted conspiracy to have kanglus here by vested interests

 

[johny_baba]

there is another reason and it's sinister one, i got it from congressi circles itself on teligram

it's TO KEEP INSURGENCY IN THE NE REGIONS DOWN BY GIVING THEM A COMMON ENEMY - means without kanglu subhumans infiltration giving a constant reason to the indian *ahem* state to keep manpower deployed there, NE regions would have rebelled hard to secede - but these kanglu subhumans *ahem* 'keep them in check and give them compulsory incentive to be part of the union'

btw this muslims as 'common enemy' to unite easily divisible folks here is also expanded to other things by congies, that, Ambedkar's total population swap idea was rejected by nehru-gandhi and other stalwarts simply because they realised if all muslims transferred to their pak heaven, local hindus would eventually start infighting among themselves in name of jaati-varna-bhasha-sanskruti etc differences 'specially the bheemtaa kinds who're ever vindictive towards the savarnas for '5000 saal se paani nahi peene diya reee' - and even back then Ambedkar was itching to get that designated Dalitistan by going full bheem meem yuti but idea got punctured by Gandhi through Puna Pact and meem immediately focused back to their pakistan dream, leaving him behind

congressi circles often argue that non-savarnas are often prime targets of pissfulls here more so than savarnas so *ahem* savarnas should just sit back and relax while pissfulls take bheemtaas to cleaners with their shrewdness and street jihad - and honestly, seeing the bheemtaa kinds going apeshit recently over lots of matters, can you really blame these kongies for their kind of social engineering conspiracies?


^these and kinds of things aren't usually meant for public consumptions so i rarely talk about it, i'll let the mods decide if my posts here and above should be allowed or not

 

[shitsandgiggles]

just search who're biggest meat and beef dhandho guys in India...not some muslims, but heh, jains...

Appne hi saale madarchod hai

 

[shade2]

there is another reason and it's sinister one, i got it from congressi circles itself on teligram

it's TO KEEP INSURGENCY IN THE NE REGIONS DOWN BY GIVING THEM A COMMON ENEMY - means without kanglu subhumans infiltration giving a constant reason to the indian *ahem* state to keep manpower deployed there, NE regions would have rebelled hard to secede - but these kanglu subhumans *ahem* 'keep them in check and give them compulsory incentive to be part of the union'

This would make sense, but most Kangluls in the NE are found in Assam
Not Mizoram
Not Nagaland
Not Meghalaya
Not Manipur

This is a cope by congis, not a >reason.

 

[shade2]

btw this muslims as 'common enemy' to unite easily divisible folks here is also expanded to other things by congies, that, Ambedkar's total population swap idea was rejected by nehru-gandhi and other stalwarts simply because they realised if all muslims transferred to their pak heaven, local hindus would eventually start infighting among themselves in name of jaati-varna-bhasha-sanskruti etc differences 'specially the bheemtaa kinds who're ever vindictive towards the savarnas for '5000 saal se paani nahi peene diya reee' - and even back then Ambedkar was itching to get that designated Dalitistan by going full bheem meem yuti but idea got punctured by Gandhi through Puna Pact and meem immediately focused back to their pakistan dream, leaving him behind

congressi circles often argue that non-savarnas are often prime targets of pissfulls here more so than savarnas so *ahem* savarnas should just sit back and relax while pissfulls take bheemtaas to cleaners with their shrewdness and street jihad - and honestly, seeing the bheemtaa kinds going apeshit recently over lots of matters, can you really blame these kongies for their kind of social engineering conspiracies?


^these and kinds of things aren't usually meant for public consumptions so i rarely talk about it, i'll let the mods decide if my posts here and above should be allowed or not

This atleast makes sense, It's similar to why Jooz still have 20% Arab greens in Israel.
Or why they have Gaza/WB not fully annexed

 

[johny_baba]

This would make sense, but most Kangluls in the NE are found in Assam
Not Mizoram
Not Nagaland
Not Meghalaya
Not Manipur

This is a cope by congis, not a >reason.

Assam (1947–1963) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

except manipur, rest of current NE states comprised that big frontier province of Assam back then, and kanglu chhap bengali k2a migrations started there before '47, around late 20s to early 30s of 1900...so yeah

also, mizo nagas and so are far more radical than ahomiyas

 

[shade2]

Assam (1947–1963) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

except manipur, rest of current NE states comprised that big frontier province of Assam back then, and kanglu chhap bengali k2a migrations started there before '47, around late 20s to early 30s of 1900...so yeah

also, mizo nagas and so are far more radical than ahomiyas

Yes, so if this gr*nd conspiracy was true, their /areas should have been filled with Kanglus.
Instead you have border districts of what is now Assam overflowing with them.

 

[Adibot]

Yes, so if this gr*nd conspiracy was true, their /areas should have been filled with Kanglus.
Instead you have border districts of what is now Assam overflowing with them.

And what are Hindu assamese doing
Why aren't they as radical as nagas

 

[Ajayant Tripathi]

there is another reason and it's sinister one, i got it from congressi circles itself on teligram

it's TO KEEP INSURGENCY IN THE NE REGIONS DOWN BY GIVING THEM A COMMON ENEMY - means without kanglu subhumans infiltration giving a constant reason to the indian *ahem* state to keep manpower deployed there, NE regions would have rebelled hard to secede - but these kanglu subhumans *ahem* 'keep them in check and give them compulsory incentive to be part of the union'

I also somewhere read the same theory. It is also the reason for Indira Gandhi to not go for sea access at that time. The theory is we needed to keep them caged.

But then i don't understand why were they allowed to convert? Why did the state let the missionaries experiment with them.

 

[johny_baba]

Yes, so if this gr*nd conspiracy was true, their /areas should have been filled with Kanglus.
Instead you have border districts of what is now Assam overflowing with them.

I also somewhere read the same theory. It is also the reason for Indira Gandhi to not go for sea access at that time. The theory is we needed to keep them caged.

But then i don't understand why were they allowed to convert? Why did the state let the missionaries experiment with them.

if you can filter out obvious bjp and itcelliya chhap bias from it all, read works of certain "Rajnikant Puranik" and by read i mean not to just find faults with nehru but to get overview of various background scenarios of past from that era

 

[ArjunMK1A]

I can see only 2 reasons why BJP would keep Kanglus in India.

1) To use them as a scare mongering tactic to scare normie Hindus to vote for BJP by showing a bogeyman.

2) Cheap labor.

I don't think the Gujju duo are so shameless to do it due to reason no 1 so I guess it's for cheap labor.

Obviously this applies only if the tweet posted by that Khangressi chamcha is true.

You answered your point. Kanglus, Nepalis were extremely cheap labor in big Metropolitan Cities like Bengaluru. They work as domestic worker in societies where handle upto 10 houses per day. The salary is bare minimum, tries to get fake adhaar, cannot complain anything you are illegal. Can hire and fire cheap.

These are part of blue collar workers employed there. Politicians, Local Police know this. Blue collar work by Southern States people already reduced. They moved ahead or demand more salary. (Lot of them moved into apps like Urban Company, Apna which demands more salary).