Ghatak UAV/UCAV (2 Viewers)

[randombully]

We can't handle AMCA on time, you want a B-21 like bomber

B21 is much larger, can carry 12-13 tons payload.

I'm asking for measly 4ton payload in iwb, no external payload. But with longer iwb to be able to carry "longer" standoff weapons.
25-30 ton mtow, 2 kaveri.

For example Tejas can carry 4 ton payload.
Tejas mk2 6.5 tons.

No new tech needed, can borrow from ghatak and amca program and other programs underway.

 

[Bhartiya Sainik]

B21 is much larger, can carry 12-13 tons payload.

I'm asking for measly 4ton payload in iwb, no external payload. But with longer iwb to be able to carry "longer" standoff weapons.
25-30 ton mtow, 2 kaveri.

For example Tejas can carry 4 ton payload.
Tejas mk2 6.5 tons.

No new tech needed, can borrow from ghatak and amca program and other programs underway.

We all can keep our opinions, but i don't wanna go in circles repeating the disadvantages of boomerangs with weak engines.

Don't you desire our jets to EASILY defeat Chinese Hongdu GJ-11 Sharp Sword & CH-7?

Everything costs money. I would prioritize a future manned fighter + fighter UCAV 1st.

If you want 25-30 tons MTOW, that's like AMCA only + you get a fighter-bomber wingman UCAV. The AMCA itself can be turned into UCAV.

UCAVs also need to be hack free, fly collision free in group, should have intelligence if links are jammed.
So let our DoD 1st demonstrate these elementary things 1st.

, Zircon, Kinzal, etc or IRBMs can be turned into VLR-ARM.

 

[FalconSlayers]

Ghatak UCAV's DcPP is Larsen and Toubro

View: https://x.com/kishanchand_89/status/1945450373285650788

 

[strat]

Ghatak UCAV's DcPP is Larsen and Toubro

View: https://x.com/kishanchand_89/status/1945450373285650788

LRU integration is going on , does this mean that the airframe is semi-ready? @randombully thoughts?

 

[FalconSlayers]

- Lead in Project FUFA taken for RPSA Configuration finalized for RPSA

- Detailed Design Review of airframe is held and manufacturing activities are in progress

- KD Engine integration and testing with all SPS systems completed

- Realized quad-channel tester inclusive of HW and SW, & certified

- Completion of preliminary CLAW studies including mission studies

- Aero data generation by wind tunnel testing and CTD completed; Critical Design Review held

- PSSA and maintainability report completed

- Integrated Flight Control Computer, landing gear, and structural test rig are in advanced stages of development

- RPSA PDR and 16 subsystem PDRs - completed

- Costing for deliverables and baseline - under review

- Feasibility, risk analysis, and time estimation - completed

- CCS proposal and AON concurrence from IAF - under approval

- PSQR compliance, EOL, and RFP for DePP identification - under approval

From: @ShiroBarks on stratfront

Said BJPigs haven't granted CCS approval.

 

[randombully]

LRU integration is going on , does this mean that the airframe is semi-ready? @randombully thoughts?

Post in thread 'Ghatak UAV/UCAV' https://defenceforumbharat.com/threads/ghatak-uav-ucav.246/post-181211

 

[liberalredditor]

When will we get prototype roll out and first flight? 2027 optimistic?

Eots hai kya final design me?

 

[randombully]

2027 optimistic?

Possible but yeah optimistic.

Eots hai kya final design me?

Yes

 

[FalconSlayers]

Possible but yeah optimistic.



Yes

This thing is yet to get CCS approval, how are they gonna manage roll out and FF without it? Especially when they used internal funds to design and develop SWiFT as well, which again doesn't seem to be getting inducted by IAF.

 

[FalconSlayers]

View: https://x.com/alpha_defense/status/1945732197614580063

 

[randombully]

This thing is yet to get CCS approval, how are they gonna manage roll out and FF without it? Especially when they used internal funds to design and develop SWiFT as well, which again doesn't seem to be getting inducted by IAF.

The file/proposal is still not submitted to CCS for clearence.

 

[Savageking456]

This thing is yet to get CCS approval, how are they gonna manage roll out and FF without it? Especially when they used internal funds to design and develop SWiFT as well, which again doesn't seem to be getting inducted by IAF.

From the recent news
It seems paper work has yet not been submitted to CCS
How will there be sanctioning then?
Makes sense since ucav is under PMO
He once Paper work is submitted he should sign asap

 

[FalconSlayers]

From the recent news
It seems paper work has yet not been submitted to CCS
How will there be sanctioning then?
Makes sense since ucav is under PMO
He once Paper work is submitted he should sign asap

UCAV under PMO? like the SSBN project?