Idiotic Musings from the West

Coming to the topic of BBC, does anyone remember that documentary 'India's daughter', the way that docu was made pretty much implied Indian men as rapists because of that one incident.

These BBC choots have all the time in the world to worry about other countries, even had a dedicated section for rape in India all the while ignoring these pedos running amok in their own country.

Given the amount of propaganda material available, Indian media and WION/Firstpost should start making docu seires on this and perhaps title the documentary as 'The little rape island". And just to cause more heartburn to the gorey Britshits, they should mention that the perpetrators were just British citizens(instead of mentioning their race and ethnicity).

Afterall, BBC doesn't care if the rapists were mulla, xtian or Hindu, we're just Indian. So if the Indian media had any brains, they'd apply the same standards to Britshits. Btw, if anyone is planning on trolling the britshits, use the same strategy, don't bring packies into this thing.

And if the goreys try to differentiate themselves from packies, then say you're all the same anyway.:creepy:
 
realsumo said:
Personally, I would like to know what the meaning of India is for different people. Yes, we might all be loyal to India, but people have different views and perspectives on what "India" means to them. Does everyone who is loyal to India share the same goals? I don't think so.

This would make sense in an actual debate conducted in good faith. However, against online trolls, counterpoints and more offensive strategies might be more effective. After all, offense is the best defense in such scenarios.

Wait, are we actually discussing blasphemy here? If rules are being made to ban blasphemy, then perhaps we need rules to define what constitutes blasphemy.
Personally, I think people have the right to be offensive. After all, we can create an echo chamber here, but to develop counter-strategies, we need to understand other perspectives.
Click to expand...
Some of us here define India as the current Republic of India.

Some see it as the upcoming Hindu Rashtra or Akhand Bharat.

Personally, I stand for the Republic of India, as it is the only practical option. I don't see a Hindu Rashtra coming in a country where the supposedly Hindu nationalist party can't even protect Hindu minorities in neighbouring country. Nor is it practical to erase the 200+ million ummahs from this country even with a century of continuous focus. Therefore, I make do with supporting the present system. So do the Christian members of this board, I see no reason for them to support "Hindu Rashtra" while remaining christians themselves.

I feel like the majority here sees through the eyes of Hindu Rashtra/Akhand Bharat though. I could be wrong. Also christians are pretty integrated into our society, especially Kerala christians. They have a long history, and nowadays even use elephants and stone divas (wtf?) in their churches. They have no problem dressing in traditional clothing for Onam or Vishu, and are pretty nationalistic themselves. We have no need to alienate such people.
 
shade2 said:
Aah, finally someone asks "Why did Nupur say so and so?"
If you check my post history here and on old board if it ever comes online, I do talk shit about anyones gods, not even once, and only this time it was because provocation.

And yes, no scriptural references, I just repeated blasphemies & lies belted out by Commies and Greens about your deities,
Like the swine below repeated Jewish blasphemies & lies about mine 👇



Sorry since y'all got offended by blasphemies( ofc ) just like I did.






Arre ban me it's ok.
Click to expand...

Don’t push it.
 
realsumo said:
Personally, I would like to know what the meaning of India is for different people. Yes, we might all be loyal to India, but people have different views and perspectives on what "India" means to them. Does everyone who is loyal to India share the same goals? I don't think so.

This would make sense in an actual debate conducted in good faith. However, against online trolls, counterpoints and more offensive strategies might be more effective. After all, offense is the best defense in such scenarios.

Wait, are we actually discussing blasphemy here? If rules are being made to ban blasphemy, then perhaps we need rules to define what constitutes blasphemy.
Personally, I think people have the right to be offensive. After all, we can create an echo chamber here, but to develop counter-strategies, we need to understand other perspectives.
Click to expand...
Did someone say Blasphemy!
I Rocketman , the founder and prophet of the cult of rockets hereby declare all faithfuls will go to fiery heaven on the wings of a glowing rocket with lsp > 100000 seconds & attain eternal life in the cosmos.
Those who try to berate our lord & his prophet will be smitten by a mach 10 , 4000°C projectile coming straight from heavens .
 

Attachments

  • images (1).webp
    images (1).webp
    31.3 KB · Views: 1
RedPhantom said:
Some of us here define India as the current Republic of India.

Some see it as the upcoming Hindu Rashtra or Akhand Bharat.

Personally, I stand for the Republic of India, as it is the only practical option. I don't see a Hindu Rashtra coming in a country where the supposedly Hindu nationalist party can't even protect Hindu minorities in neighbouring country. Nor is it practical to erase the 200+ million ummahs from this country even with a century of continuous focus. Therefore, I make do with supporting the present system. So do the Christian members of this board, I see no reason for them to support "Hindu Rashtra" while remaining christians themselves.

I feel like the majority here sees through the eyes of Hindu Rashtra/Akhand Bharat though. I could be wrong. Also christians are pretty integrated into our society, especially Kerala christians. They have a long history, and nowadays even use elephants and stone divas (wtf?) in their churches. They have no problem dressing in traditional clothing for Onam or Vishu, and are pretty nationalistic themselves. We have no need to alienate such people.
Click to expand...

The only reason why I haven’t banned Shade is because I came across Indian soldiers who gave their sweat and blood for modern India and support Hinduism and happen to be Christians themselves. Granted they were not of the evangelical type variety but of the old Christian sect strand that were there before Portuguese came. If those soldiers gave their blood and sweat and some of their lives defending India I owe it to them to help defend their beliefs as long as they don’t interfere with mine or others.
 
Blademaster said:
as long as they don’t interfere with mine or others.
Click to expand...
This is the root of all the problems.

*The pressure is greatest in central and northern India, where the governing party of Prime Minister Narendra Modi is firmly in control, and where evangelical Christian groups are making inroads among Hindus, albeit quietly. Pastors hold clandestine ceremonies at night. They conduct secret baptisms. They pass out audio Bibles that look like little transistor radios so that illiterate farmers can surreptitiously listen to the scripture as they plow their fields.

*Vinod Patil, a Pentecostal preacher in Madhya Pradesh, is not giving up. Just as Hindu extremists believe it is their duty to stop conversions out of Hinduism, Pastor Patil believes his religious duty is to spread Christianity. These days, he operates like a secret agent.

He leaves his house quietly and never in a group. He jumps on a small Honda motorbike and putters past little towns and scratchy wheat fields, Bible tucked inside his jacket.

Someone stopping conversions out of Hinduism is an extremist. But, someone with a "glorious religious duty" to convert others and destroy native civilisation is not a Christian Extremist.

Take a look at this nytimes article, it perfectly demonstrates their viewpoint. Converting others and propagating their religious ideas is a noble goal, but protecting one's community from foreign religious ideologies is extremism.

Source-
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/22/world/asia/india-christians-attacked.html
 
sameer said:
Given the amount of propaganda material available, Indian media and WION/Firstpost should start making docu seires on this and perhaps title the documentary as 'The little rape island". And just to cause more heartburn to the gorey Britshits, they should mention that the perpetrators were just British citizens(instead of mentioning their race and ethnicity).
Click to expand...
That would be nice, but you are expecting too much from our "presstitutes".
 
shade2 said:
Aah, finally someone asks "Why did Nupur say so and so?"
If you check my post history here and on old board if it ever comes online, I do talk shit about anyones gods, not even once, and only this time it was because provocation.

And yes, no scriptural references, I just repeated blasphemies & lies belted out by Commies and Greens about your deities,
Like the swine below repeated Jewish blasphemies & lies about mine 👇



Sorry since y'all got offended by blasphemies( ofc ) just like I did.






Arre ban me it's ok.
Click to expand...
  • You guys have been committing ish-ninda against Mahadeva and Maa Jagdamba since 19th century so much so that Swami Vivekananda finally had to tell the missionary agent during a boat ride that he will throw him into the sea if he doesn't stop blasphemy against Hindu deities.
  • It is you who should actively protest against 99% of christian preachers who make extremely disgusting comments about Hindu deities.
  • Majority of Hindu saints have been praising Jesus all these decades and yet what we got in return? Nothing but blasphemy.
  • Look at you, you got irked by some stranger on this forum. Now think about us when we see those well established christian preachers coming in front of camera and making blasphemous videos on Youtube, writing blasphemous articles and magazines since 1850s against the "evil" Hindu religion. Have you ever been in our shoes?
  • And to those DFI members who are defending @shade2, have you forgotten the absolutely inhumane Goa inquisition which will make ISIS and Taliban look like Saints and the systematic hijacking of the Hindu mind to hate his own Dharma which even the Muslim invaders couldn't achieve in past 700 yrs?
  • All I am saying is zero tolerance against any blasphemous post against Sanatana Dharma. We have tolerated enough, we have praised Jesus enough for the past 150 years and yet all we got in return was blasphemy.
 
Last edited:
Blademaster said:
The only reason why I haven’t banned Shade is because I came across Indian soldiers who gave their sweat and blood for modern India and support Hinduism and happen to be Christians themselves. Granted they were not of the evangelical type variety but of the old Christian sect strand that were there before Portuguese came. If those soldiers gave their blood and sweat and some of their lives defending India I owe it to them to help defend their beliefs as long as they don’t interfere with mine or others.
Click to expand...

As someone who comes from an Army family, I've seen many Christians who have sacrificed a lot for this country. Not everyone is a religious bigot and certainly nowhere near the M's.

The middle class and upper middle class Christians are quite neutral people.It's the rural folks who are quite problematic.
 
angryindian said:
As someone who comes from an Army family, I've seen many Christians who have sacrificed a lot for this country. Not everyone is a religious bigot and certainly nowhere near the M's.

The middle class and upper middle class Christians are quite neutral people.It's the rural folks who are quite problematic.
Click to expand...
That sacrifice has its own place and honour. A random conspiracy theorist who will blame the Jews for his bawasir as well, will not be entertained for his vile thoughts against Dharma
Either he has to apologise or should be banned.
 
angryindian said:
As someone who comes from an Army family, I've seen many Christians who have sacrificed a lot for this country. Not everyone is a religious bigot and certainly nowhere near the M's.

The middle class and upper middle class Christians are quite neutral people.It's the rural folks who are quite problematic.
Click to expand...

True.
Of course, there's nuance to every community out there and recency bias kinda blinds us to said nuance; to that effect, you'll find many army grunts that happen to be rural Christians as there are rural Hindus in the army.
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Also guys, c'mon, can we get back to the topic at hand and bash goras as this thread was envisaged.

Don't let the whiteboy laugh at our self-divide-and-rule.👇
43.webp
 
Cyclops said:
True.
Of course, there's nuance to every community out there and recency bias kinda blinds us to said nuance; to that effect, you'll find many army grunts that happen to be rural Christians as there are rural Hindus in the army.
______________________________________________________________________________________________

Also guys, c'mon, can we get back to the topic at hand and bash goras as this thread was envisaged.

Don't let the whiteboy laugh at our self-divide-and-rule.👇
View attachment 21006
Click to expand...
Couldn't have said better words .
We bicker , while the perfidious Albion laughs .
Eek rehna hai , batoge sab ek ek kar katoge .
Jo log America me rehke bharat me civil war ki bare me bol rahe hain, bas kardo
Aur jo bharat me rehke unki baate maan rahe hain , wo thoda history padhlo
Defence forum pe rehke ian Cardoso aur Denzil keelor ke naam ke aage laughing emoji deke aur khud ko neecha mat karo.
 
GaudaNaresh said:
We actually defeated the central Asians a LOT - until we couldnt. We mostly know the history of when we couldnt, because when we could is rarely recorded in history as most of our historical records are destroyed and the turki/mooslem didnt have writing and/or didnt record their defeats.

But problem is, we could ONLY defeat them when we had a bigass empire in the north. Why ? Because only BIGASS empires can afford to have thousands of war elephants, which is checkmate for a cavalry army.
But when u r small itty bitty kingdom size like Kannauj or Malwa or such, you can afford to field 100-300 war elephants.
Which are a terrific force, but in a battle involving 30K-50K on each side, u have a pathway to win if the other side has 300 'undefeatables', provided that you can avoid them in battle and take out REST of the enemy army before the 300 undefeatables kills all of u.
But when the number of undefeatables get to 2000-5000 or more, then its checkmate, its the equivalent of 'you showed up to battle of kursk with no tanks. gg noob'.

These are precisely the points when history when India fell to the central asias, because except for the final days of Gupta empire and Timur the psychopath, no central asian empire has ever beaten a North Indian empire that spanned most of Northern Indian subcontinent, prior to the invention of cannons.
(Cannon age = end of elephant age, coz war elephant or not, elephants are hyper-social and they form bonds with one another and 'raju over there exploding in a bloody mess from giant boomstick' = elephants know whats up and run the fuck away)

You will also notice, that through the ENTIRE period of pre-cannon age, the greatest, mightiest empires of Iran never ever directly fought a north Indian empire: and its not due to lack of opportunity.
The Magadh empire from at least 380s BCE to 330s BCE bordered the Sakhamani Persian empire, the Guptas and Sassanian Farsi empire literally shared border from 350s CE to 470s CE.

So why no direct clash between any of the main Indian empires and Persia and why is Persian expansion in India coming only in-between the fall of empires ( like when Persia took over parts of Punjab & sindh during both these empires, it happened before meeting the Magadh empire and before the rise of Gupta empire). Why ???
Because Yamuna river is the biosphere boundary of the Asian elephant - Asian elephant populations do not exist and have never existed in nature west of the Yamuna.
So the greatest heavy cavalry force of the ancient era ran into the same problem as the central asians : elephants are checkmate. Even more so for heavy cavalry coz u HAVE to get in the elephants face to poke it with ur pointy stick as heavy cavalry.


PS: As to the 'why didnt our great vikramaditya or ashoka or so n so go whack afghanistan and iran with their thousands of war elephants' angle, incase anyone is that naive about logistics, the answer is simple :
once you cross the indus going west, good luck watering and feeding 5000 war elephants, let along the rest of 100K men with u.
I dont think even TODAY India has enough water trucks and lorries carrying forests for elephant dinner to march 5000 elephants from New Delhi to Tehran if i were to guess, but i cant be sure.
Click to expand...
FYI- new evidence is coming out as to people who claim that Guptas have (minor) victories against persians.
Vinash said:
No ban since we haven't written any rules yet.

And yes, if we were to ban you, we'd have to ban the guy you were responding to since he blasphemed against your religion and you blasphemed in response.
Click to expand...
Do not ban this guy please. My response wasn’t to him but to this inbred whore.

View: https://x.com/leonardaisfune/status/1876426522422390922?s=46
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Satish Sharma Ji
North American Puppet State- Idiotic Musings
Replies
15
Views
1K
Nutcracker
Nutcracker
fire starter
  • Sticky
Sinking State of Bangladesh: Idiotic Musings
85 86 87
Replies
2K
Views
115K
Azaad
Azaad
haldilal
Failed Terrorist State of Pakistan: Idiotic Musings
174 175 176
Replies
4K
Views
261K
Cheepek
C
bong
Oogabooga Musings from SEA
Replies
1
Views
329
bong
bong
sameer
  • Sticky
Brown Coolie Musings
7 8 9
Replies
170
Views
10K
AbRaj
A

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Share this Site

Back
Top