Indian Economy

Another propaganda article about muh inequality from British bhosda corporation.


Every developing country goes through this phase,
Housing thing is more urban management issue than wealthy issue, there are still fuckton of places to build affordable housing.

It's a shill article to benefit the Chongs + chorgress/liberal narratives of "rich getting richer, poor getting poorer"
 
It's a shill article to benefit the Chongs + chorgress/liberal narratives of "rich getting richer, poor getting poorer"
Bet you could make the same argument for China in 2008 when there were a similar sized economy lol.

Can't this be explained by simple per capita income basis why release a whole ass article about this
 
Bet you could make the same argument for China in 2008 when there were a similar sized economy lol.

Can't this be explained by simple per capita income basis why release a whole ass article about this

It's a propaganda article made to drive the narrative I have mentioned + benefit to the chongs.
They are not looking into good-faith explanations.

Also indeed many such articles were made about China also in 2008 thereabouts, including about Air Quality of Beijing and "minority oppression" of Tibetans.
 
It's a shill article to benefit the Chongs + chorgress/liberal narratives of "rich getting richer, poor getting poorer"

Another propaganda article about muh inequality from British bhosda corporation.


Every developing country goes through this phase,
Housing thing is more urban management issue than wealthy issue, there are still fuckton of places to build affordable housing.
Another raid on BBC needed.

Also, rubbish data. Read up the national household expenditure survey to get the true picture.

Anyway, I suspect this new 'report' is based on the fraud paper published by the condom fail turned international abomination known as Thomas Piketty so there is that. Sorry, I won't mince my words here.

Either way, no point outraging here. Those who are active on xitter can e-lynch the authors. The combinatiom of state backed harassment and mass e-lynching campaigns at regular intervals is the ultimate cure for atrocity/poverty porn.
 
Last edited:
Another raid on BBC needed.

Also, rubbish data. Read up the national household expenditure survey to get the true picture.

Anyway, I suspect this new 'report' is based on the fraud paper published by the condom fail turned international abomination known as Thomas Piketty so there is that. Sorry, I won't mince my words here.

Either way, no point outraging here. Those who are active on xitter can e-lynch the authors. The combinatiom of state backed harassment and mass e-lynching campaigns at regular intervals is the ultimate cure for atrocity/poverty porn.

not a survey, it was an oped type of research paper.

 
not a survey, it was an oped type of research paper.


Any reference to Piketty in the 'paper'? Or bekar mein usko pel diya?
 
nah, this was written as a market survey to assist startups in figuring out their target customer base.
noticed this paper when @shuturmurg posted a slide from this paper a few days ago in this thread.
Interestingly the same comment was observed here where the user said the same exact line. Where our tier 1 customer base was as big as Mexico consume class, you reckon bbc writers frequent this website
 
Interestingly the same comment was observed here where the user said the same exact line. Where our tier 1 customer base was as big as Mexico consume class, you reckon bbc writers frequent this website

internalisation of western gaze is a better explanation. when someone internalises "western gaze" they tend to echo gora talking points.
 
nah, this was written as a market survey to assist startups in figuring out their target customer base.
noticed this paper when @shuturmurg posted a slide from this paper a few days ago in this thread.
Damn, I was expecting an academic paper at least. Even some op-ed written by Kaushik Basu, Amartya Sen et al would do.....


Do these guys pick up anything and everything to peddle their agenda?
 
internalisation of western gaze is a better explanation. when someone internalises "western gaze" they tend to echo gora talking points.

I think it is more of the internalization of W*stern funds in their bank account but ye bhi valid point hai.
Sepoys need to have a certain ((( mindset ))) to be recruited after all, not any random guy can be a deceitful think-tankist, academic or patrakar.
 
internalisation of western gaze is a better explanation. when someone internalises "western gaze" they tend to echo gora talking points.
An interesting data point would be how big this consumer class has grown since the liberalisation.
 
Interestingly the same comment was observed here where the user said the same exact line. Where our tier 1 customer base was as big as Mexico consume class, you reckon bbc writers frequent this website
Its not this website. Its a report by Blume research, a very respected research group, whose reports are primarily used by international businesses for planning their international investment strategies.

BBC has their own narrative to run, so they will interpret it as whatever suits their agenda.

But the real interpretation here is as someone posted earlier, is that we have been unable to attract mass low end manufacturing, like clothing, footwear, furniture and house hold items manufacturing.

That's whats causing income inequality, as people with no college education don't have a way to move out of unproductive agriculture into industry, hence their incomes are not rising.

On the other hand people with good college education are benefitting from india's growing services exports due to more and more GCC's (global capability centers) moving into India and also India moving up services value chain.

That's the true story, but lefty and BBC types will do randi rona of Adani/Ambani and asking for more welfare. That's not the solution and sadly our opposition (Rahul) is a moron and is completely surrounded by Commie advisors (Kanhaiya/Jean Dreze types), hence won't raise any of these issues. Infact they will try and derail any reform (labour or land reform) that Mudi tries to bring.
 
China dwarfs the entire world with over one BILLION tons of steel production.
that over capacity is what is causing unlimited damange to the worl economy with china flooding everything made of steel, chips by being ultra cheap.
they are then using all the money they get (forex) to buy up raw material access from impoverished/corrupt nations that cannot withstand their pressure (Africa, Pak, SL)
in some cases, even building entire logistics networks (Shipping containers, merchant ships, ports)
this is the modern day colonialism.
 
China dwarfs the entire world with over one BILLION tons of steel production.

that over capacity is what is causing unlimited damange to the worl economy with china flooding everything made of steel, chips by being ultra cheap.
they are then using all the money they get (forex) to buy up raw material access from impoverished/corrupt nations that cannot withstand their pressure (Africa, Pak, SL)
in some cases, even building entire logistics networks (Shipping containers, merchant ships, ports)
this is the modern day colonialism.

From China's perspective, if bringing 1.4B people to live in industrilized and post-industrilized society, we need to keep per reserve (steel inside buildings, vechiles, ships, ports, airport, bridge, roads etc..) at same level of USA, EU, JP, S.K:

Comparison among different countries
The United States: The steel stock reached a stable level of 2 billion tons, with an average of 8.8 tons per capita.

The United Kingdom:
The steel stock stabilized at 400 million tons, with an average of 7.6 tons per capita.

Japan: The steel stock tended to stabilize at 1.5 billion tons, with an average of approximately 10.5 tons per capita.

South Korea: The average steel stock per capita reached 9.5 tons upon completing industrialization.


The situation in China:

As of 2022, China's social steel stock was approximately 12 billion tons, with an average of 8.3 tons per capita. In 2023, China's social steel stock was approximately 12.8 billion tons, with an average of 8.9 tons per capita. It is predicted that by 2030, China's steel stock will reach 13.2 billion tons.

By this definition, one Billion steel production is a OK level for the goal, if you really check the export data, still 90% of consumptions are domestic, and for any facotry, if you plan a 1B tons production, you need set a buffer on 1.1 or 1.2 B ton capability, the rest of 10% and 20% can be exported, of couse it's cheap due to massive production volume.


PS. Indian members like the narratives created by western media, like "debt trap", "over capacity"; But few people tried to understand the reality behind it, please do more research on each topic. When India try to enter the mid income nation, you should have the same level of per reserve of steel.
 
Last edited:
From China's perspective, if bringing 1.4B people to live in industrilized and post-industrilized society, we need to keep per reserve (steel inside buildings, vechiles, ships, ports, airport, bridge, roads etc..) at same level of USA, EU, JP, S.K:

Comparison among different countries
The United States: The steel stock reached a stable level of 2 billion tons, with an average of 8.8 tons per capita.

The United Kingdom:
The steel stock stabilized at 400 million tons, with an average of 7.6 tons per capita.

Japan: The steel stock tended to stabilize at 1.5 billion tons, with an average of approximately 10.5 tons per capita.

South Korea: The average steel stock per capita reached 9.5 tons upon completing industrialization.


The situation in China:

As of 2022, China's social steel stock was approximately 12 billion tons, with an average of 8.3 tons per capita. In 2023, China's social steel stock was approximately 12.8 billion tons, with an average of 8.9 tons per capita. It is predicted that by 2030, China's steel stock will reach 13.2 billion tons.

By this definition, one Billion steel production is a OK level for the goal, if you really check the export data, still 90% of consumptions are domestic, and for any facotry, if you plan a 1B tons production, you need set a buffer on 1.1 or 1.2 B ton capability, the rest of 10% and 20% can be exported, of couse it's cheap due to massive production volume.


PS. Indian members like the narratives created by western media, like "debt trap", "over capacity"; But few people tried to understand the reality behind it, please do more research on each topic. When India try to enter the mid income nation, you should have the same level of per reserve of steel.
How about attaching the MSS report or the farticle from People's Daily or Global Times to your post so that we can blame this BS you typed on them & not on you ?
 
How about attaching the MSS report or the farticle from People's Daily or Global Times to your post so that we can blame this BS you typed on them & not on you ?

Why go personal? boring. Please stick to the topic and respect this thread.
 
Last edited:

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top