North Korea Watch

Kim chan's new flagship Destroyer Choi Hyun
View attachment 31923
View attachment 31924

View attachment 31925
130mm gun, 12x ASCM cells, 10x ASBM cells, 32x short range SAM cells, 12x long range SAM cells, 8x unidentified (possible ASCM) cells, 1x Kashtan CIWS, 2x AK-630 CIWS, 4x ASW Rocket mounts, 8x countermeasure/decoy launcher mounts.

Probably missed some stuff at a glance.
4 Extended slope missile launch pad × 2
4 Extended Torpedo Launchers × 4
4 Extended small anti -ship missile launch pad × 4
Phased array radar
 
Design is based on stolen data on ROK's Daegu and Chungnam class ships. H/PJ-38 130mm gun from China, Kashtan from Russia. Missile tech is also from either these countries. AK-630 fork, Countermeasure launchers and Type-87 ASW rockets from China.
Did they make this in house using these individual components or CBU from China?
 
They made the ship in their own dry docks. Regional analysts are skeptical about the steel used in it's construction.
Thanks!
This is what I was asking about but the membraans are answring something else.​
 
Kim chan's new flagship Destroyer Choi Hyun
View attachment 31923
View attachment 31924

View attachment 31925
130mm gun, 12x ASCM cells, 10x ASBM cells, 32x short range SAM cells, 12x long range SAM cells, 8x unidentified (possible ASCM) cells, 1x Kashtan CIWS, 2x AK-630 CIWS, 4x ASW Rocket mounts, 8x countermeasure/decoy launcher mounts.

Probably missed some stuff at a glance.
That should be like 4% of their GDP. But Shipbuilding needs lots of manhours, means plenty of working class families got their bellies filled. ( i hope).
 
That should be like 4% of their GDP. But Shipbuilding needs lots of manhours, means plenty of working class families got their bellies filled. ( i hope).

Daddy Kim can do anything in his kingdom. In Fact entire Korean Penninsula is ruled by 5 chaebols.

1. Hyundai
2. LG
3. Samsung
4. SK
and last and finally 5. Kim enterprises.
 
Kim chan's new flagship Destroyer Choi Hyun
View attachment 31923
View attachment 31924

View attachment 31925
130mm gun, 12x ASCM cells, 10x ASBM cells, 32x short range SAM cells, 12x long range SAM cells, 8x unidentified (possible ASCM) cells, 1x Kashtan CIWS, 2x AK-630 CIWS, 4x ASW Rocket mounts, 8x countermeasure/decoy launcher mounts.

Probably missed some stuff at a glance.
Brief analysis of the (North Korean) Korean People's Army Navy (KPANF) Choi Hyun class Destroyer/Frigate.

It seems to be a very well rounded, albeit mishmashed combination of North Korean, Chinese and Russian naval armaments on a Type 054A/B hull.

Displacement: 5000 tons


2.webp
1.webp
 
Brief analysis of the (North Korean) Korean People's Army Navy (KPANF) Choi Hyun class Destroyer/Frigate.

It seems to be a very well rounded, albeit mishmashed combination of North Korean, Chinese and Russian naval armaments on a Type 054A/B hull.

Displacement: 5000 tons

View attachment 31984
View attachment 31983


They compromised the Heli hangar and replaced them with Missiles.
 
Brief analysis of the (North Korean) Korean People's Army Navy (KPANF) Choi Hyun class Destroyer/Frigate.

It seems to be a very well rounded, albeit mishmashed combination of North Korean, Chinese and Russian naval armaments on a Type 054A/B hull.

Displacement: 5000 tons

View attachment 31984
View attachment 31983
These shops are far better equipped than ours
Definitely chinese have helped a lot
That too in 5000 tons, definitely would have compromised in range
Hope we add atleast vlsrsam to our destroyers forget about CM and BM
 
These shops are far better equipped than ours
Definitely chinese have helped a lot
That too in 5000 tons, definitely would have compromised in range
Hope we add atleast vlsrsam to our destroyers forget about CM and BM
why would north korea need more range?
There area of interest is korean peninsula.

This frigate size ship is a "multi purpose destroyer", the only reason it's the size of a frigate is because north korea doesn't need the range and endurance of a bigger ship.
It's similar to heavily packed small israeli corvette, which has radars, VLS count that rivals our P15 A/B destroyers, but displacement of only ~2000 tons, because israel doesn't need more range and endurance for its maritime area of interest.
 
why would north korea need more range?
There area of interest is korean peninsula.

This frigate size ship is a "multi purpose destroyer", the only reason it's the size of a frigate is because north korea doesn't need the range and endurance of a bigger ship.
It's similar to heavily packed small israeli corvette, which has radars, VLS count that rivals our P15 A/B destroyers, but displacement of only ~2000 tons, because israel doesn't need more range and endurance for its maritime area of interest.
Yes Sa'ar is excellent system for their need and requirements
In our case range is essential but we should have atleast second layer AD along with few vls longer sub sonic CM


Anyway it's a dream hope vlsrsam gets integrated to most of our destroyers and frigates
 
Yes Sa'ar is excellent system for their need and requirements
In our case range is essential but we should have atleast second layer AD along with few vls longer sub sonic CM


Anyway it's a dream hope vlsrsam gets integrated to most of our destroyers and frigates
the extra p17B nilgris that are cleared will come with VL-SRSAM and VL-LRSAM installed.
And both p17A and p15 A/B will be retrofitted with VL-SRSAM and VL-LRSAM along and subsonic long range cruise missile.
Lots of available extra space in our ships, navy is just waiting for development of these missiles and some budget increase, both p15A/B and nilgiri are made with future in mind, their full potential is yet not achieved.
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top