Absolutely, that and I was also impressed with how well the towed gun positions were camouflaged and protected using HESCO fortifications, based on what was shown in the media later.Everyone is talking about AAD -Akashteer / AI and C2 centre of Air-Defence, why so much bias towards Gunners. We have also given a thumping firepower retaliation to Porkies. Work done by Artillery Networked Integrated system ie our own SHAKTI (ACCS) is not getting recognized, there is feeling of jealous and being left out.
Firing solution and 3D simulation of projectile calculated by this system before flattening Neelam valley when Porkies ran for cover deserves recognition.![]()
Yes, the terrain is limiting factor for any mounted Gun. We have seen that and experienced it in Galwan conflict . Imagine gun to be mobilized towards Leh, Depsang and DBO. Vajra surprisingly did come in handy. What Pakis thought would be a firepower advantage turned out be nightmare. If the 4x4 vehicle breaks down the gun is useless. If the gun develops fault while firing again its useless. Our Arty pgme is well thought and practical based on our ground and terrain experience.Absolutely, that and I was also impressed with how well the towed gun positions were camouflaged and protected using HESCO fortifications, based on what was shown in the media later.
There is also chatter about dismal combat performance of PCL-181, is there any substance to these. Also, based on whatever social media videos of their use in POJK were available, looks like the terrain restricts gun deployment quite a bit. They were only deployed and firing from wide valleys.
Pakistan tried blindly copying PLA but they should have considered that PLA deploys these guns mainly on the Tibet Plateau. The terrain there is more suited for mounted guns.Yes, the terrain is limiting factor for any mounted Gun. We have seen that and experienced it in Galwan conflict . Imagine gun to be mobilized towards Leh, Depsang and DBO. Vajra surprisingly did come in handy. What Pakis thought would be a firepower advantage turned out be nightmare. If the 4x4 vehicle breaks down the gun is useless. If the gun develops fault while firing again its useless. Our Arty pgme is well thought and practical based on our ground and terrain experience.
Just one problem with that assumption. CIA is everywhere inside Porkyland and knows almost every single detail even more than porky themselves because of technology. (Satellites that detect radiation leak also available for civillians)Pakistan’s Fake Nuclear Leak and U.S. Intervention
On May 10, the final day of Indian missile strikes, Pakistan claimed a radiation leak at its bombed nuclear site near Kirana Hills.
Was it real? ……Highly unlikely. Most evidence suggests the story was fabricated to draw American sympathy—and it worked.
Quwa Group -> Although to be taken as pinch of salt, this is relatively less partial and more rational(although some part is dubious) and good analysis podcast by Pakistani British 2nd gen analysts who are engineers(1 aerospace, another scientist and so on). Its a must watch and they seem to have lot of inside news.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzrflQPLH_E&pp=ygUKcXV3YSBncm91cNIHCQmyCQGHKiGM7w%3D%3D
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-PQQTXrZyU
Absolutely everything works perfectly that's why we able to finish it in 4-5 days.Everyone is talking about AAD -Akashteer / AI and C2 centre of Air-Defence, why so much bias towards Gunners. We have also given a thumping firepower retaliation to Porkies. Work done by Artillery Networked Integrated system ie our own SHAKTI (ACCS) is not getting recognized, there is feeling of jealous and being left out.
Firing solution and 3D simulation of projectile calculated by this system before flattening Neelam valley when Porkies ran for cover deserves recognition.![]()
I mean of course they aren't going to admit all their shortcomings and try to grasp at positive straws..Lmao you too fell for this new type of chooran porkies are selling. It's not a must watch for any sort of impartial or rational analysis. It's a must watch ONLY if you want to understand how the porkies think.
I listened to one of those two in its entirety. The only rational bit about their 1 hour episode was the brahmos bit that too ONLY because they need to somehow attribute the very public humiliation we dealt to them (the pictures and videos of all the damage we inflicted).
Heres a question, how can you downplay your opponents clear victory without appearing as downplaying? Here's one way: Attribute all their success to one wonder weapon, blame your leadership or spin it as restraint/rational thinking, be obtuse about the success of a couple of the enemies strategy and systems and ultimately just say we have everything the enemy has we just need to scale it up.
This is exactly what they are doing in the "rational" discussion. It's not "some part is dubious", most of it is dubious.
I will tell you what part is not dubious:
1. Effectiveness of brahmos (discussed for quiet a bit)
2. Effectiveness of our AD (discussed but not in detail, totally over looked Akash and DEW and other indian systems, attributing most of AD successes to foreign systems)
What is dubious in their discussion:
1. Their interception rate of drones and loitering munitions we fired (they mention it once something like we fired 24 drones but only 2 hit)
2. They hit a brahmos site and a s400 site
3. At no point they discuss the sheer volume of drones they fired on us
4. No mention of the HQ systems being hit
5. We used our equipment sooner because out plan a and plan b failed to do any significant damage but apparently their responses to our initial attack was enough in some ways.
6. They did not use their top tier equipment (in terms of missiles and drones and loitering munitions) unlike us.
7. No mention if their CM400 or some Chinese origin shit missile that we intercepted
8. Harping on about how they are a wonderful design heavy nation (da fuk they are) but not good into putting their amazing fantastic designs into production.
9. The usual, China saar, China this saar, China that saar.
10. The only two faults porkies did in this conflict is show too much restraint and not show enough evidence of their attack damage.
You fall for this then
1. You are porkie larping as indian or
2. You one of the hundreds of millions of Indians who fall for 2 sweet words but ignore the 1000 insults behind it.
why didn't pakis used taimur Cruise missile during the operation, It was hyped up a lot by pigs to be used against indian HVTs.
Like I said, they paid only cursory glance at our capabilities (admittedly they are quiet worried as evident even in the brief few minutes they do touch up on them). But for the most part their podcast was all about "we did not use our best weapons (we don't know why), but Indians used theirs because our jawab to their initial attacks was lajawab, we forced them" to "we have everything they have, we need to scale it up". Even when they discuss the bramhos and how difficult it is to counter it, they search for parity with us and claim they should/will build a comparable system to counter us.I mean of course they aren't going to admit all their shortcomings and try to grasp at positive straws..
Their podcasts are different because pakistanis usually never admit their fears of india
They admit India won
They lay out their fears. A lot of which are beautiful to me hear.
Like this gem here:
View attachment 38864
I hope every anxiety patient in here sees this. Domestic production puts fear in enemy hearts. Imports don't.
My comments are only to these two podcasts they publishLike I said, they paid only cursory glance at our capabilities (admittedly they are quiet worried as evident even in the brief few minutes they do touch up on them). But for the most part their podcast was all about "we did not use our best weapons (we don't know why), but Indians used theirs because our jawab to their initial attacks was lajawab, we forced them" to "we have everything they have, we need to scale it up". Even when they discuss the bramhos and how difficult it is to counter it, they search for parity with us and claim they should/will build a comparable system to counter us.
And then there is the usual "China sàar".
Sometimes it is better to not to use the weapon you tout as your best because you know it's inferior to your adversary's. So just keep the enemy guessing while putting with "restraint".why didn't pakis used taimur Cruise missile during the operation, It was hyped up a lot by pigs to be used against indian HVTs.
I have not come across an official confirmation but based on all the money Pakistan is receiving from USA, it is highly likely that Pakistan will be used as a launchpad by USA against Iran. Thus, I would not be surprised if USA has started moving man and material to Pakistan. It is quite possible that some US assets were hit by Indian Air Force during Operation Sindhoor; I do not know. Eventually we will know. One thing is for sure, USA was not just hoping, it was casually sure that India would get hit by at least one Pakistanese nuclear bomb. USA did not expect that India would start bombing Pakistanese nuclear facilities. On the contrary, USA was expecting to put pressure on India using threats of Pakistanese nukes. However, once India started bombing Pakistanese nuclear facilities in the broad day light, US gamut to contain India fell apart.I do hope you're wrong.
I would love to hear years from now that we got a few burgerchods too and that they were scurrying around after seeing only a handful of standoff munition explode so close to them.
My theory:
- Some burgers either were hurt or were very close to being hurt.
- They were in contact with USCENTCOM throughout the whole skirmish.
- Strikes happen, CENTCOM contacts DOD+Washington and confirm IAF is not stopping
- Combine the above with the fear of a balkanized pakistan, they had to say uncle(make pakis say uncle) before IAF pwnage got too extreme.
- The possibility of multiple US servicemen being liquidated in pakistan right after pakis launched a terrorist attack into India would be a major humiliation for everyone(State Dept, Washington, Intel-dipshits & DoD), especially since they would not have a justified reason to riposte militarily against "these bloody Indians"
. We did all of that without losing escalation dominance.
- Eventually, Vance intervenes, ONLY a few days after he confidently proclaimed to the world that this was not their conflict.
>Be Murica
>Send 2 carrier battle groups to pwn the Houthis
>Lose multi million dollar drones to basic bitch SAMs
>Lose FA-18s to "carrier maneuvers", Houthis say they shot them down
>F-35 turns tail after facing Houthi SAMs
>Trump declares victory, promises Houthis will stop, Murican media copes
>HOUTHIS DON'T STOP
>Wake up the next day to Indians decisively pwning your rabid dog
>Indians do airstrikes and A2AD better than you
>Rinse and Repeat
Amen to that.
I agree that India will start downgrading its military ties with USA. This is quite surprising. Because, most of us were expecting that Trump would patch the trust deficit created by Biden. On the contrary, the trust deficit has increased between India and USA.I get your point and agree to an extent.
The US was certainly taken aback by our offensive capability but what would have really hurt is our defensive capability that prevented any Porki attack from landing.
I don't believe we will see any new offers of significant defense sales to India from the US anytime soon. Not that we should even consider any of them.