Operation Sindoor and Aftermath (102 Viewers)

Chinese weapons are usually used by countries that cannot afford the Russian or Western stuff or couldn't get their hands on smuggled Soviet era ones. Burma is one of the poorest country in Indian subcontinent/SEA region and that is seriously saying something. I'm only really concerned about their fifth generation fighter capabilities because it's better to overestimate an enemy and be prepared than to underestimate them and get caught sleeping.

Chinese 5th generation means 2-3 rd generation in real warplanes anything China claims is total BS . Why did they buy s-400 if hq9 was so great???

Before underestimating Chong domestic weapons keep in mind that they are building these to fight or deter the US in a showdown over Taiwan.

Most of their exports are of the garbage quality maal they produced before the current muscling up, and the current muscling up products like J-10 are only exported to Paapistan and are obviously cut down so as to not reveal anything about Choinees hardware to Paapi's US patrons who will surely ((( take a look ))).

Anyway because of their reputation of garbage that only BPL countries buy, their exports don't find any takers in the world market, countries would rather buy Russian rebadges of 80s Soviet gear instead.
 
The spicy jhumlas both to domestic and foreign audiences are only meant to dissuade the Paapistanis from trying any other stunts.

It is part threat and part setting India's muscular responses as standard to foreign govts and nothing new or unexpected
Like the Jews regularly bomb Gaza but it never makes it as some big headline breaking news.

However Gazans don't have nukes so idk how 1:1 this messaging will work.
Indian military and policymakers have a deeper understanding of nuclear deterrence than we do. There are many questions—whether Pakistan would be able deploy nuclear weapons in the event of a full-scale war, whether those weapons are secure from Indian strikes regardless of their deployment status—but it’s the Indian military and decision-makers who are best positioned to assess these issues.

In any scenario, it’s always preferable to destroy the nuclear weapons of Pakistan.
 
Indian military and policymakers have a deeper understanding of nuclear deterrence than we do. There are many questions—whether Pakistan would be able deploy nuclear weapons in the event of a full-scale war, whether those weapons are secure from Indian strikes regardless of their deployment status—but it’s the Indian military and decision-makers who are best positioned to assess these issues.

In any scenario, it’s always preferable to destroy the nuclear weapons of Pakistan.
We missed that during this conflict
Some are even saying that paki nukes have been confiscated by uncle sam
 
We missed that during this conflict
Some are even saying that paki nukes have been confiscated by uncle sam
Us does have limited control/oversight over pakistani nukes.
This was the deal US was given for its support of pak army rule and jailing of Imran khan( civilian gov.)
There's a reason US didn't come out to support "muh democracy" when army forced Imran khan out.
 
Us does have limited control/oversight over pakistani nukes.
This was the deal US was given for its support of pak army rule and jailing of Imran khan( civilian gov.)
There's a reason US didn't come out to support "muh democracy" when army forced Imran khan out.

Wardi-wearing dalals of that country probably have US personnel in the storage and production facilities keeping watch.

Nukes are exclusively to ((( deter ))) or threaten India.
Maybe US will give them permission to fire a tactical nuke on their Punjab to deter India also
 
Actual hgv, Better glide ratio, so more range.

Not much info so can't say much more.
Defence decode was claiming in one of his video that they will use Agni 5's boosters for launching it. How much speed that would theoretically achieve?
 
Patrakar might be bullshiting but i hope this news of Su57 reaches someone

View attachment 39034

I mean Aayega to Rafale Hi so the above pic is still relevant, it's a pity the Su57 is a half-assed plane
Tbh we would be interested in Su-75 if it wasn't a light combat aircraft. The design is much better than Su57 but it is not suitable for our need. Plus it's gonna be very expensive to set-up production here.
 
Last edited:
so many drones in Pakistani airspace—what’s going on? Are they panicking, or are they expecting another Indian strike?
 
Defence decode was claiming in one of his video that they will use Agni 5's boosters for launching it. How much speed that would theoretically achieve?
Using that, it can reach mach 15+, even exceed mach 20.
Basically russian avangard( russian hgv used in nuclear delivery role) category hgv.
But that will also confirm it's use as a nuclear delivery platform, with range that can cover anywhere in the world.

If used in conventional role, the booster will be smaller.
 
Using that, it can reach mach 15+, even exceed mach 20.
Basically russian avangard( russian hgv used in nuclear delivery role) category hgv.
But that will also confirm it's use as a nuclear delivery platform, with range that can cover anywhere in the world.

If used in conventional role, the booster will be smaller.
Nothing stops us from just using that to do bunker busting right in case we ever want to target Pakistan's harden nuclear storage sites? Like Mach 15+ projectile with that much weight would destroy a hardened structure without even a warhead in theory. Though I guess we are thinking of using this against China primarily.
 
Nothing stops us from just using that to do bunker busting right in case we ever want to target Pakistan's harden nuclear storage sites? Like Mach 15+ projectile with that much weight would destroy a hardened structure without even a warhead in theory. Though I guess we are thinking of using this against China primarily.
My guy Agni 5 rises to a max altitude of 600km, if an enemy country detects it, it's a guarantee they will assume it's a nuclear attack.


In actual "conventional" usage if planned, smaller booster will be used, max speed would be ~mach 10.

There are many other ways to destroy a hardened structure.
If the need was that high and we lacked other means( we don't), we can just go korean way and develop a missile similar to hyunmoo v, hyunmoo V is a south korean submarine launched tactical ballistic missile with payload of whooping " 8 tons" of conventional warhead, made to destroy most heavily fortified north korean bunkers, and will be cheaper than launching dhavni on Agni v booster.



Yeah dhavni is basically made to be used against chinks.
 
TB2T1071 refers to a Bayraktar TB2, a Turkish-made medium-altitude long-endurance (MALE) unmanned combat aerial vehicle (UCAV). Is flying in Pakistani airspace near sargodha
 


Does anyone really think that India's procurement of the SU-57 will go down well with the U.S. and the EU?

The Orange Guy will likely suspend the sale of GE F404 and GE F414 engines, which would cripple the Tejas Mk1, Mk2, and AMCA programs. He might also withhold critical components and impose sanctions on Indian firms.

Worst of all, if the Su-57 proves to be a vaporware, as many suspect, it would spell disaster not only for the Indian Air Force but also for the entire country
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top