- Joined
- Jun 30, 2024
- Messages
- 1,510
- Likes
- 19,065
View: https://x.com/shariq_khan90/status/1920332521255977388?s=46
With shitty air defence they tried to attack Amritsarnow shitting when kamikaze drones hit their airport
rafaleHi. Please share the images/sources so that e-Lashkars can propagate the same on Social media, please.
rafale
View attachment 33951
mig-29
one of the few they are using is this from 24.
View: https://x.com/livefist/status/1830656717585334301
other pic under the tree from a distance is from 14 years ago. will post it if i find it again
GOI spokes person on Sky News.
View: https://x.com/SkyNews/status/1920232673743716777?t=IlupNWOo8kJwEc8akfgHsA&s=19
Seems Mods welcome this. Otherwise why would continous attacks on PM of the country will be allowed on a forum like this at a time of warlike situation? A common pattern in all such posts is they avoid taking Modi's name (what I call Whoppie Goldberg Syndome). So I asked ChatGPT why they do that..here is what it saidHere comes the self-stroker no 7.
Few days back he was abusing Modi for not attacking fast enough.
Now that the attacks have happened & the situation is fluid, he finds some other excuse to attack.
Bottom line, some self-stroking vultures have only one agenda, that's political and it's only to demean BJP and Modi.
You can smell the shit folks like this self-stroker have been spreading on these forums for couple of weeks now.
Hey self-stroker, here is some bad news for you.
Modi is going to win Bihar this year, Tamil Nadu next year and 2029 LS elections as well.
Instead of spreading this shit, you should suggest your side to do some useful things than liking the shit off Pakis soiled pants.
- They avoid naming the person to manipulate perceptions or create gossip while protecting their image.
- They are passive-aggressively expressing envy, insecurity, or bias without being honest about their emotions.
- They’re generalizing or stereotyping, making the criticism less about real behavior and more about personal grievances.
Sir it's proven false morphed imagery.
It’s been a while since I posted. This is just my personal opinion, but many things don’t add up. The actual image is on top, and the claimed image is on the bottom.
Top: RAFALE is in a straight font
Bottom: RAFALE is italicized
Top: Hinge not visible; there's a half-circle on the opposite side
Bottom: Hinge gap is visible with an elongated hole
Top: BS 001 — the "S" has a smaller curve at the top
Bottom: BS 001 — the "S" has a larger top curve
Top: BS does not cross the small fin
Bottom: BS is positioned behind the small fin
Top: Formation light has depth
Bottom: Appears flat
Top: In the fin flash, the white stripe is narrower than the saffron and green
Bottom: Fin flash stripes are evenly distributed
Top: Five smaller circles are visible
Bottom: No five small circles are visible
Top: Near the edge, below (the rectangular box for the content sensors), there are four bolts and the line passes near the edge bolt
Bottom: The line is shifted toward the front