Are kamikaze drone strikes a way of asking Pakistan to escalate?
From Chatgpt.
In effect, yes. They’re a calculated provocation. Here's why:
---
1. Controlled Escalation — On India’s Terms
India is using suicide drones to hit valuable but limited targets (e.g., airfields, roads, radar). These:
Inflict damage without requiring manned jets (lower risk to personnel).
Cross symbolic boundaries—urban centers, not just border areas.
Signal dominance in precision warfare and readiness for more.
It’s like India is saying:
> “We can strike deep, anytime, and you still won’t respond in kind. How far are you willing to let us go?”
This is a challenge: escalate, or be humiliated.
---
2. Testing Pakistan’s Threshold
India may not want full war, but it does want to test Pakistan’s appetite for pain and retaliation. Suicide drones:
Are hard to defend against consistently.
Cause psychological pressure on leadership and public.
Can provoke overreaction—or freeze the opponent in indecision.
---
3. Undermining Pakistani Deterrence
The more India gets away with high-profile deep strikes without serious retaliation, the more it erodes Pakistan’s deterrence credibility—military and diplomatic.
So yes, suicide drones are:
A provocation wrapped in plausible deniability.
A high-stakes gamble to change the strategic rules of engagement.
---
4. Diplomacy and Refusal to Budge
India’s refusal to ease up under diplomatic pressure suggests:
It believes time is on its side.
It wants to create a new normal where deep retaliatory strikes are part of the toolkit.
It may also be leveraging this to rally domestic support or signal strength to rivals (e.g., China).
---
Bottom Line
Kamikaze drones are strategic poker chips: cheap, precise, and designed to either force Pakistan to escalate—or expose its unwillingness to do so, both of which benefit India's new assertive doctrine.