Operation Sindoor

Yes. As primary source they will put CNN. The reporter who said that it was India who sought help from US for de-escalation after Banyan-Al-Chaddi plane/missile attack since it was too hot.
The CNN reporter never said that . He said 'Pakistani sources' told him that India asked for US intervention , Obviously Pakistan are Maddrassa educated with English as the 5th language . But we shd not get into the sand narrative .

Anyway the current US govt hates CNN. Most Americans don't believe anything from them . Not sure why Indians and Pakis care what they say.
 
Following 'alarming intelligence,' US VP JD Vance called India’s PM Narendra Modi to encourage ceasefire talks - CNN
View attachment 34958
Pakis likely planted this intelligence and lured others to intervene. They've been successful. They got what they wanted. US intervened and asked to de-escalate.
I am speculating that our top diplomats did us dirty (again) by persuading Modi.

There are others in the system who don't like this, maybe the psyops (beheading) is from that side.

Looking at Shehbaz Sharif's speech it's very clear that they're not going to change. Pakis are jubilant.

So we are going to lose this chance, more people will be killed by jihadis in future, and we will go through the same circus again. Rinse and repeat.

Modi ought to take the right decision...
 

Ha ha ha.

Porkis didn't make a fool out of Uncle. Uncle knows what uncle is doing and needs its munna alive for dirty work.

Porkis made a fool out of us and we willingly let it happen.

Why? Who is at war with Porkis? Us or Uncle?

Uncle is not the one sitting here facing a nuclear armed terrorist country which is hell bent on killing our citizens under a nuclear umbrella.

Anyways, hope things recover!!
 
Last edited:
Listen people , seeing lot of kali tikiya on this even for me .
Especially regarding our victory being forgotten.
No it won't be .
Tell them everytime the truth , which is they begged like bitches for a ceasefire .
Also when asked about rafale , post screenshots of what we have done. There are plenty of evidence .
Won't be scrubbed, and if they show any " proof " tell them simply brahmos was fantastic.
Don't fall for this amount of dejection.
We may be angry on priest king , but we will defend him to death if a paki pokes his head .
Good night .
 
DFB members should not beat the war drum without foreseeing the consequences of such actions. Our objective was not to fight a war, but to achieve justice for the victims and establish deterrence. Prolonging the conflict does not favor India, as war has many tangled consequences that may take years to recover from, while the benefits are often reaped by others. The government's decision to achieve a ceasefire was made after considering all aspects.
What was the exact justice we achieved here exactly? Striking the terror outposts does nothing in the long run as they would be proped up again as long as pak army is there, we struck their bases we had superiority but it seems as our forces were made to target just the runways which would be repaired in maximum of 2 weeks and then we struck a non profitable ceasefire while having increased number of civilian casualities now then with what we started. So what exactly was the objective that we achieved after loosing so many civilians and wasting so much AD ammos. And moreover even though we struck their bases we havent claimed strongly how much losses we inflicted, how long do you think our achievent will last when the entire gloabal media starts peddling the paki propoganda to the international audiences? I think all we ended up with at last is some PR for people loosing lives and the forces not being "allowed" to inflict severe damages. Sorry if i sound too much black pilled but these are some objective questions that i raise.
 
Pakis major cities burned while we laughed at them from our major cities comfortable and cushy.

And now they'll be slowly dying of thirst over the next few years.

Sure, "success".

Yes our objectives are achieved 100 times over

INDUS WATER TREATY is gone…

Our economic strength will provide us much more resources in years to come enhancing our defence capabilities many times over …

pakistanis will always be chasing some baap to give them something to have a little chance against India but they will never be able to do anything.
 

We have not removed troops from China, that's it, the most Chowmeins would do is to do their propaganda posturing but by that time Paikhanastanis air force would be history.

Ye 10 feet Chinaman ka bogee band karo bhailog, 2 front war was always in mind.

Regarding if China decides to mobilise then it gives India full right to quickly finish Paikhanastanis and leave them then for afghans and balochis and move to China front.
 
Ye thoda below the belt ho gya 😆

Anyways expectations are higher from Modi compared to Rahul Baba 🙄
Ye below the belt was almost a reality just a year ago. And this was not because he was perceived as a weak PM on national security, but because the opposition spread false rumours of removal of constitutional guarantee of reservations. That's the reality of our so called democracy.

We have to cater to international community who cannot let go of their favourite bitch that is Pakistan who are always ready to sell themselves for few dollars. If you want US to support us like they do for Israel then we had to sever relations with Russia after Ukraine invasion and become a sort of treaty ally to them. We can't be forging our own path in current geopolitical scenario and expect unconditional support from the Goras.
 
Last 2 weeks starting with the IWT abeyance, every time Modi is quiet, the same people on here insult him. Then he takes massive action and most of these same guys give zero praise and go quiet. Then Modi quiet again, insults again. Repeat lol Must have been 4 cycles by now. Some of these guys are likely Muslim infiltrators.

I could never have dreamt that we could attack all Paki air force bases and get away with it. And bomb plus destroy a mosque with hiding terrorists in Punjab.

0 planes over Paki airspace right now. 200 over India.

Water wars coming, let there be no doubt.

And fingers crossed, more surprises this coming week.
 
The way it ended did not impose any deterrence on Pakistan, just like Balakot didn't. A military defeat is not a defeat for the Pakistani army. They will always take another aid from USA to buy a new set of F-16s. The only real defeat for Pakistan army is reputational. Unless you tarnish their reputation in front of Pakistanis you will never win. They have already spun this as victory. Thd only way India could tarnish their reputation was to put handover of Masood Azhar/Hafiz Saeed as a precondition for ceasefire
 
Can we collect all images/videos of damage to piggy airbases .. gonna need forum ammo .
 
What's the worst that May happen if we choose to carry on ahead?
Millions of IT coolies fired?
Market crash?
Sanction?

We have to take into account of what our worth is.
We aren't some nation that other counties can walk over, we are some nations positive cash flow in the form of pension funds and investment.
 
What was the exact justice we achieved here exactly? Striking the terror outposts does nothing in the long run as they would be proped up again as long as pak army is there, we struck their bases we had superiority but it seems as our forces were made to target just the runways which would be repaired in maximum of 2 weeks and then we struck a non profitable ceasefire while having increased number of civilian casualities now then with what we started. So what exactly was the objective that we achieved after loosing so many civilians and wasting so much AD ammos. And moreover even though we struck their bases we havent claimed strongly how much losses we inflicted, how long do you think our achievent will last when the entire gloabal media starts peddling the paki propoganda to the international audiences? I think all we ended up with at last is some PR for people loosing lives and the forces not being "allowed" to inflict severe damages. Sorry if i sound too much black pilled but these are some objective questions that i raise.
 
What's up with this



Good sir you are justified in doubting our political leadership as they had let us down many times in the past. But I guess the horrific Pahalgam incident has triggered something into our psyche where even peaceniks are baying for Paki blood. As for banging them remember we achieved the objective of our initial strikes when we destroyed the terror camps deep inside Pakistan which the international community was onboard with. Beyond that we needed Pakis to attack us and escalate. This was always going to be limited to retaliation. MEA pressers are supposed to be sugarcoated but our response on the ground has been anything but proportionate. We fucked up their multiple air bases in broad daylight and they couldn't achieve jackshit even after continuous trying for 3 straight nights. So yes I believe the govt when it says our military have free hand as they are the ones determining the rules of engagement.

As for the ceasefire we couldn't say no when the other side was begging for one to the orange man. I am sure we conveyed to the orange man that we are doing this only at his insistence, giving a massive rub to this huge ego. If anything this blatant violation by the Pakis would have bruised his ego for sure and also giving us enough reasons to continue pounding them.

We are criticising Modi for not showing spine to continue this war but please also remember in the last general if some of the close results didn't go his way, he would not be the PM today. Imagine Raul Baba as PM, Akhilesh as DM and Mamata as EAM, what would have been our response to Pahalgam?
O bhai bas kar !

Why compare Modi to Rahul and Mamata.
Why do u think we deserve them.
I know Modi ji did a great job and will do something about it hopefully.
Agar Modi na hota hypothetically toh yogi hota ya fir shah ji or even nitin gadkari.

Now our objective was/is to make pakistan pay for all their terrorist activities. And make it so that they will never attack . Punish them.
Tell me why did we agree ceasefire ?
Did Pakistan agree to take care of terror
Did paki show some positive response to terror issue ?

Not to get some brownie points of we broke some roads , did u hear they activate most of their bases except one. So no objective is not yet met. We should have or would take this to a point where they realise this can’t goon same anymore.
 
Last edited:

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top