- Joined
- Jul 8, 2024
- Messages
- 1,679
- Likes
- 11,190
The CNN reporter never said that . He said 'Pakistani sources' told him that India asked for US intervention , Obviously Pakistan are Maddrassa educated with English as the 5th language . But we shd not get into the sand narrative .Yes. As primary source they will put CNN. The reporter who said that it was India who sought help from US for de-escalation after Banyan-Al-Chaddi plane/missile attack since it was too hot.
Pakis likely planted this intelligence and lured others to intervene. They've been successful. They got what they wanted. US intervened and asked to de-escalate.Following 'alarming intelligence,' US VP JD Vance called India’s PM Narendra Modi to encourage ceasefire talks - CNN
View attachment 34958
What was the exact justice we achieved here exactly? Striking the terror outposts does nothing in the long run as they would be proped up again as long as pak army is there, we struck their bases we had superiority but it seems as our forces were made to target just the runways which would be repaired in maximum of 2 weeks and then we struck a non profitable ceasefire while having increased number of civilian casualities now then with what we started. So what exactly was the objective that we achieved after loosing so many civilians and wasting so much AD ammos. And moreover even though we struck their bases we havent claimed strongly how much losses we inflicted, how long do you think our achievent will last when the entire gloabal media starts peddling the paki propoganda to the international audiences? I think all we ended up with at last is some PR for people loosing lives and the forces not being "allowed" to inflict severe damages. Sorry if i sound too much black pilled but these are some objective questions that i raise.DFB members should not beat the war drum without foreseeing the consequences of such actions. Our objective was not to fight a war, but to achieve justice for the victims and establish deterrence. Prolonging the conflict does not favor India, as war has many tangled consequences that may take years to recover from, while the benefits are often reaped by others. The government's decision to achieve a ceasefire was made after considering all aspects.
Pakis major cities burned while we laughed at them from our major cities comfortable and cushy.
And now they'll be slowly dying of thirst over the next few years.
Sure, "success".
View: https://youtu.be/MNiIIgJVbRM?si=gQj3SbnPg6UGvM0v
Preston stewart totally batting for PAK..
Is this just this guy or Does USA wants this narrative
It can't be scrubbed off that easily. Our E-lashkars have downloaded every single clip of bombs dropping on their ass out there.Except their propoganda is amplified and
our evidence is surpressed, the videos by grass eaters will be scrubbed from internet or brushed off as "fire in airbase haha "
Ye below the belt was almost a reality just a year ago. And this was not because he was perceived as a weak PM on national security, but because the opposition spread false rumours of removal of constitutional guarantee of reservations. That's the reality of our so called democracy.Ye thoda below the belt ho gya
Anyways expectations are higher from Modi compared to Rahul Baba![]()
What was the exact justice we achieved here exactly? Striking the terror outposts does nothing in the long run as they would be proped up again as long as pak army is there, we struck their bases we had superiority but it seems as our forces were made to target just the runways which would be repaired in maximum of 2 weeks and then we struck a non profitable ceasefire while having increased number of civilian casualities now then with what we started. So what exactly was the objective that we achieved after loosing so many civilians and wasting so much AD ammos. And moreover even though we struck their bases we havent claimed strongly how much losses we inflicted, how long do you think our achievent will last when the entire gloabal media starts peddling the paki propoganda to the international audiences? I think all we ended up with at last is some PR for people loosing lives and the forces not being "allowed" to inflict severe damages. Sorry if i sound too much black pilled but these are some objective questions that i raise.
O bhai bas kar !What's up with this
Good sir you are justified in doubting our political leadership as they had let us down many times in the past. But I guess the horrific Pahalgam incident has triggered something into our psyche where even peaceniks are baying for Paki blood. As for banging them remember we achieved the objective of our initial strikes when we destroyed the terror camps deep inside Pakistan which the international community was onboard with. Beyond that we needed Pakis to attack us and escalate. This was always going to be limited to retaliation. MEA pressers are supposed to be sugarcoated but our response on the ground has been anything but proportionate. We fucked up their multiple air bases in broad daylight and they couldn't achieve jackshit even after continuous trying for 3 straight nights. So yes I believe the govt when it says our military have free hand as they are the ones determining the rules of engagement.
As for the ceasefire we couldn't say no when the other side was begging for one to the orange man. I am sure we conveyed to the orange man that we are doing this only at his insistence, giving a massive rub to this huge ego. If anything this blatant violation by the Pakis would have bruised his ego for sure and also giving us enough reasons to continue pounding them.
We are criticising Modi for not showing spine to continue this war but please also remember in the last general if some of the close results didn't go his way, he would not be the PM today. Imagine Raul Baba as PM, Akhilesh as DM and Mamata as EAM, what would have been our response to Pahalgam?