Operation Sindoor

indus_markII said:
Any news about the PAF pilot, that plane went down near Srinagar yesterday. Was he captured alive or is dead for good
Click to expand...
That news is not true, paki jets haven't crossed LOC throughout this whole conflict. With layer of akash mrsam and s-400, they can't do swift retard anymore. PAF for now is not a massive threat anymore, like a lot of people throught.
 
Imagine the strategic losses that Pakistan made. IWT gone. Pakistan is not even in a position to demand it. If we had gone begging for caesefire and Pakis would have been like, "We will not stop until IWT is restored."
Case is extremely opposite. They begged for caesefire.

Now, we will demand conditions to stop pounding them. The best course of action would be to continue attacking terror installations as and when we want--keeping a low intensity war ongoing for a year or two. That will extract more cost from Pakistan than a full domain intense war for a week or two.

Pakis have it that they can direct terror attacks and deny plausible links. They are in a continuous state of action. We also have to be in a continuous state of action. It should not take a big drama to start Pak pounding. Threshold should be extremely low. And it has significantly come down in last 15 years. Imagine we did nothing after Mumbai attacks because Pakistan is a nuclear armed countries. We started with Uri, then Balakot, and now Op Sindoor. Each time, the intensity has increased and threshold come down. In future, regardless of any government in power, it would be impossible to not take action in case of terrorist attack. It is a norm now.

And we bent the norm even more when we said that we will consider terrorist attacks as an act of war. It means that next time after terror attack, we will directly go pound Pak military, not terrorists.
 
Cyclops said:
We know the kind of effect Yalda Hakim has had in this conflict.
Yalda-Hakim.jpg



But apart from her, Asmongold's coverage of the Pahalgam attack and Op Sindoor has singlehandedly perception-managed for the entirety of India in the Western normie sphere.

All hail the rat-king.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXDrj7wpWUw
Click to expand...

Surprisingly reddit was quite pro-india this time around both r/worldnews is openly calling for pakis to be denuclearised.
 
Prasad said:
You mean Pakis didn't have nuclear bombs 2 days back when we were bombing the shit out of them?

Or may be you think our nuclear bombs are for making pakodas.

Sorry but if Pakis ever went to US and threatened to use nuclear bombs, US would throw them out.
You don't make threats with nuclear bombs. Those who threaten don't use. The ones who will use don't make threats.
Click to expand...
I don't think Paxtan threatened usage of N bombs. Instead Paxtan rattled we targeted their NW storage facilities would've most likely complained to the US of India not respecting a mutual pact not to target each other's N facilities threatening to target ours in a similar manner.

Whether they had the means to do so unchecked by us is a different issue. It is this that may have sent the alarm bells ringing in Washington & they decided to actively intervene to de escalate the situation namely get both sides to agree to a CF.

Perhaps this was the off ramp to use a neologism , India was looking for ,which Paxtan following in the great tradition of their leaders Ganja Sr in 1999 , implored the US to persuade India to consider.

The CF violations subsequently was the usual Punjabi Musalman cum Fauji Foundation bluster to its awam - look we got the last laugh by countering India's attempts at drone warfare with our own version of it .
 
Last edited:
Will Pakistan stop harming us after this? No. If anything, they’ve now seen the gap between our strength and their vulnerability. From this point on, they’ll increase military spending to upgrade their air defenses and strike capabilities.

Their singular obsession remains unchanged: to bleed India through a thousand cuts. They won’t stop. Sooner or later, we’ll be forced to take decisive, comprehensive action. And this was the perfect moment.

That said, this conflict is undeniably a major win for India. We’ve exposed and humiliated them. But humiliation means little to a country that lacks self-respect. They’ll return to their old ways soon enough.

View: https://x.com/theskindoctor13/status/1921208690339967135?t=I1af5jkQCNWvQCALcbNwVw&s=19
 
Azaad said:
I don't think Paxtan threatened usage of N bombs. Instead Paxtan would've most likely have complained to the US of India not respecting a mutual pact not to target each other's N facilities threatening to target ours in a similar manner.

Whether they had the means to do so unchecked by us is a different issue. It is this that may have sent the alarm bells ringing in Washington & they de
Click to expand...
ABM shield and project kusha are two most important projects going forward and thankfully both are going well.
 
eastern_bhartiya said:
ABM shield and project kusha are two most important projects going forward and thankfully both are going well.
Click to expand...

Dont forget swarm drones, the kind of impact they have left on paki masses thats 2nd only to the Modi’s Suraj Ugao Yojna in paki pakjab hinterlands…

Drones from India are main visitors of Defense Housing Society … the paranoia is real
 
Jab jab shahbaz kuch bhi bolta hai .
Uska opposite hi hota hai.
Wo ceasefire keh rah hai .
Matalab whiskey muneera , khwajasara asif ki har baat ko nazarandaz kardega
 
eastern_bhartiya said:
The point was in a general context, pok being taken back is whole different ball game. Pok is good for optics but not prectical.
Click to expand...

Right. So you, and I suspect this entire Gormint, believe that PoK is impractical and a waste of time and not worth retaking. So be it, I actually can provide many reasons why abandoning any claims or ambitions for PoK is hugely damaging for the long term, but very well. Whatever you say, let's work towards that 10 trillion dollars ekanami, without which nothing is possible.
 
jaishrikrishna said:
Imagine the strategic losses that Pakistan made. IWT gone. Pakistan is not even in a position to demand it. If we had gone begging for caesefire and Pakis would have been like, "We will not stop until IWT is restored."
Case is extremely opposite. They begged for caesefire.

Now, we will demand conditions to stop pounding them. The best course of action would be to continue attacking terror installations as and when we want--keeping a low intensity war ongoing for a year or two. That will extract more cost from Pakistan than a full domain intense war for a week or two.

Pakis have it that they can direct terror attacks and deny plausible links. They are in a continuous state of action. We also have to be in a continuous state of action. It should not take a big drama to start Pak pounding. Threshold should be extremely low. And it has significantly come down in last 15 years. Imagine we did nothing after Mumbai attacks because Pakistan is a nuclear armed countries. We started with Uri, then Balakot, and now Op Sindoor. Each time, the intensity has increased and threshold come down. In future, regardless of any government in power, it would be impossible to not take action in case of terrorist attack. It is a norm now.

And we bent the norm even more when we said that we will consider terrorist attacks as an act of war. It means that next time after terror attack, we will directly go pound Pak military, not terrorists.
Click to expand...
Unless we build any new dams or at least some canals to divert water, the treaty suspension is just a lollipop
 
fire starter said:

View: https://x.com/ShivAroor/status/1921410275707699666?t=1VGbVeFQdJB-KtMPUpUsGQ&s=19
Click to expand...


For those who did nt read

  1. According to government sources, at dawn on May 10, Indian Air Force aircraft launched BrahMos-A (air-launched) cruise missiles targeting key Pakistan Air Force (PAF) bases. The first confirmed impacts were at Chaklala near Rawalpindi and Sargodha in Punjab province. Both installations hold strategic aviation and logistics value for the Pakistan military. Confirmation of strikes on additional bases in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) - Jacobabad, Bholari, and Skardu - came only later in the evening after agencies concluded damage assessments through human and open source intelligence.
  2. Shortly after the strikes, Indian intelligence agencies detected high alert messages flashing across Pakistani defence networks indicating a belief that India might next target Pakistan's nuclear command and control infrastructure. Strategic installations in Rawalpindi, including offices linked to Pakistan's Strategic Plans Division, reportedly heightened security protocols.
  3. It was at this juncture that Pakistan reached out to the United States for urgent intervention. According to government sources, US officials had already been in contact with both sides in anticipation of escalating tensions. But the alert around strategic assets led Washington to step in more decisively.
  4. The US, while maintaining a neutral posture in public, is understood to have conveyed a firm message to Islamabad: use the official military hotline and de-escalate without further delay. The US "practically ordered" the Pakistani side to activate its direct line to the Indian Army and avoid any delay.
  5. By the afternoon of May 10, after several of Pakistan's more aggressive tactical postures had been repelled by India, Major General Kashif Abdullah, Pakistan's DGMO, placed a direct call to his Indian counterpart, Lieutenant General Rajiv Ghai. The timing of the call, 1535 hrs IST, was later confirmed by Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri at a press briefing.
  6. India continued to stand by its position of not engaging in any formal diplomatic or military negotiation with Pakistan outside of protocol. This meant that despite international pressure, New Delhi did not engage in mediation and instead signalled that the Indian armed forces were prepared for the next phase of escalation, which would have reportedly involved coordinated strikes on energy and economic targets, as well as deeper strategic command structures, government sources said.
  7. India confirmed that its decisions taken after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack - including the temporary suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) - would remain unaffected by the ceasefire.
 
fire starter said:

View: https://x.com/somnath1978/status/1921380203583975796?t=0sYz-U0_bUMSTNyc5yUEkA&s=19


View: https://x.com/milindmghosh/status/1921296697331798094?t=enUkCZf1E_CGG9LOBTrbow&s=19
Click to expand...

True being a bhosadpiller myself there were at least 3 moments were I was cursing modi at night only to wake up in the morning with a hory sheeet.
Man has done a good job only problem being misri somehow doing a bad job at wordcelling the proclaimed strong suite of Indian diplomats.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suryavanshi
  • Sticky
Operation Sindoor Official Statement and News Sources. (No Chit Chat)
2
Replies
23
Views
5K
daya
D
SKC
Rescue Operation in Wayanad
Replies
15
Views
643
VictorDelta4
VictorDelta4
hit&run
Indian Navy's Daring Rescue Operation. Critical Chinese Mariner Rescued | India Today
Replies
2
Views
550
samsaptaka
samsaptaka
haldilal
Operation Shakti
Replies
0
Views
194
haldilal
haldilal
haldilal
Operation Brasstacks
Replies
0
Views
209
haldilal
haldilal

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Share this Site

Back
Top