Pahalgam Islamic Terror Attack

I strongly suggest using Arihant and Arighat platforms to launch conventional payloads at key terror infrastructure targets inside Pakistan — specifically, LeT, JeM headquarters, ISI safehouses, and symbolic structures like the gardens or parking lots of generals' residences.

This move would achieve multiple objectives simultaneously:

Destroy terror hubs and high-value enemy assets.

Humiliate Pakistan by striking deep with precision while maintaining plausible deniability.

Dare Pakistan to escalate — and in doing so, call their nuclear blackmail bluff permanently.

Using strategic platforms like Arihant/Arighat with conventional warheads introduces total surprise into the equation. Pakistan cannot detect a submarine launch in time, cannot intercept the missiles, and cannot even organize a coherent response for several hours — crucial hours where panic and paralysis will dominate their decision-making.

Importantly, this action remains below the nuclear redline threshold. These are precision strikes on terror-related infrastructure and symbolic targets, not civilian mass casualties or strategic command centers. Therefore, Pakistan’s usual fallback of 'nuclear escalation' becomes much harder to justify internationally.

Right now, Pakistan dreams of a short air skirmish or an LoC limited engagement where they can quickly scream "nuclear escalation" the moment they start losing — expecting the world to intervene and save them.

**Instead, with this strategy, we escalate psychologically — flattening their terror network, exposing their military's impotence, and signaling that if India is willing to use strategic assets conventionally, Pakistan should imagine what happens next time. **

This leaves Pakistan with only two terrible options:

Escalate conventionally — and get annihilated in an open conflict.

Swallow the humiliation silently — and be forever marked as a broken, impotent state.

Further, the longer they hesitate (and they will hesitate under psychological shock), the more intense international pressure will mount — not on India, but on Pakistan — to de-escalate and capitulate.

In short, this strategy does what no airstrike or LoC skirmish can do: it shatters Pakistan’s nuclear blackmail shield forever without crossing into actual nuclear warfare.

Any other conventional escalation gives Pakistan easy off-ramps through nuclear threats. This strategy gives them no easy options. Only defeat or deeper humiliation.

And that’s exactly what they deserve.

Lastly, fuck pakis.
 
^^
TringTringMonster said:
strongly suggest using Arihant and Arighat platforms to launch conventional payloads at key terror infrastructure targets inside Pakistan — specifically, LeT, JeM headquarters, ISI safehouses, and symbolic structures like the gardens or parking lots of generals' residences.
Click to expand...
Arihant and Arighat aren’t conventional attack subs they are MAD ( mutual assured destruction) second strike nuclear subs. Even in case of all out war they will be underground at safe zones and not used unless to nuclear bomb. So remove the fetish of using SSBNs
 
Gandaberunda said:
^^

Arihant and Arighat aren’t conventional attack subs they are MAD ( mutual assured destruction) second strike nuclear subs. Even in case of all out war they will be underground at safe zones and not used unless to nuclear bomb. So remove the fetish of using SSBNs
Click to expand...
Okay, I get the point on SSBNs. But why not use the conventional subs like Scorpenes or Kilos? They’re much better suited for a strike like this, can launch precision missiles, and avoid the nuke escalation risk. I’m not talking about nukes here; the goal was always to hit key terror infrastructure and embarrass Pakistan without crossing the nuclear line.

The point still stands—Pakistan has been using nukes as a blackmail tool for too long. We need to take it off the table and force them to rethink their entire strategy. The idea was to strike when they least expect it, using conventional means, and shake them mentally.

Besides, the main point is to psychologically scar those fuckers.
 
TringTringMonster said:
I strongly suggest using Arihant and Arighat platforms to launch conventional payloads at key terror infrastructure targets inside Pakistan — specifically, LeT, JeM headquarters, ISI safehouses, and symbolic structures like the gardens or parking lots of generals' residences.

This move would achieve multiple objectives simultaneously:

Destroy terror hubs and high-value enemy assets.

Humiliate Pakistan by striking deep with precision while maintaining plausible deniability.

Dare Pakistan to escalate — and in doing so, call their nuclear blackmail bluff permanently.

Using strategic platforms like Arihant/Arighat with conventional warheads introduces total surprise into the equation. Pakistan cannot detect a submarine launch in time, cannot intercept the missiles, and cannot even organize a coherent response for several hours — crucial hours where panic and paralysis will dominate their decision-making.

Importantly, this action remains below the nuclear redline threshold. These are precision strikes on terror-related infrastructure and symbolic targets, not civilian mass casualties or strategic command centers. Therefore, Pakistan’s usual fallback of 'nuclear escalation' becomes much harder to justify internationally.

Right now, Pakistan dreams of a short air skirmish or an LoC limited engagement where they can quickly scream "nuclear escalation" the moment they start losing — expecting the world to intervene and save them.

**Instead, with this strategy, we escalate psychologically — flattening their terror network, exposing their military's impotence, and signaling that if India is willing to use strategic assets conventionally, Pakistan should imagine what happens next time. **

This leaves Pakistan with only two terrible options:

Escalate conventionally — and get annihilated in an open conflict.

Swallow the humiliation silently — and be forever marked as a broken, impotent state.

Further, the longer they hesitate (and they will hesitate under psychological shock), the more intense international pressure will mount — not on India, but on Pakistan — to de-escalate and capitulate.

In short, this strategy does what no airstrike or LoC skirmish can do: it shatters Pakistan’s nuclear blackmail shield forever without crossing into actual nuclear warfare.

Any other conventional escalation gives Pakistan easy off-ramps through nuclear threats. This strategy gives them no easy options. Only defeat or deeper humiliation.

And that’s exactly what they deserve.

Lastly, fuck pakis.
Click to expand...

The first logical step is to use Scalp, Brahmos, Pralay, Prthivi to crater and destroy the command & control centers, runways, fuel depots, radars, SAM sites and other related infra. This needs to be a massive and a debilitating strike. They are all static targets and cannot run or hide. Second simultaneous step is to use S400 and take out the AWACS and CAP. After that its turkey shoot for rest of the IAF if they manage to not eff it up. Just as insurance, IA should pummel them with arty and MBRLs. Third simultaneous step would be to disable or destroy Karachi port and enforce naval blockade and waterboard them through Chenab/Jhelum.

I am not even considering the nuke scenario here. If they even lift as much as a finger in that direction, blast them with MT city busters and end the farce.
 
A top source in the government told The Indian Express, “There will be military retaliation and we are prepared. We are discussing the nature of the strike… Since 2019, we have taken a series of measures to modernise our weapons. We have the option of targeting the terrorists from within our territory.”
Click to expand...
“In fact, some targets can be taken out even from your side of the Line of Control. There is the use of attack drones that can be made. I know the Air Force has some attack drones,” said Lt Gen Hooda (retd), who was the Northern Army Commander when the 2016 surgical strikes across the Line of Control in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir were conducted.
Click to expand...
While he acknowledged that the Line of Control is “heavily guarded”, the terrain is such that “you can find, you can find some vulnerable points, vulnerable targets”. “I wouldn’t completely rule out,” he said at an Idea Exchange conversation with The Indian Express.
Click to expand...
https://indianexpress.com/article/p...liatory-options-govt-9967458/?ref=breaking_hp


View: https://x.com/Global_Mil_Info/status/1916182191006007388
 

View: https://twitter.com/HinduACT/status/1916178116742984183?s=19

In the aftermath of the brutal #PahalgamTerrorAttack in India — where 28 Hindus were cold-bloodedly murdered by Islamist terrorists — the social media landscape has fractured along predictable lines:

1. Pakistani accounts, pro-#Hamas voices, and other radical #Islamist groups are aggressively pushing the despicable but familiar "false flag" narrative. This follows the same playbook as conspiracy theories like "9/11 was an inside job by Jews," #Donetsk bombed itself," and "Israel self-inflicted October 7."

2. #Khalistan cult members, usually operating under Pakistani influence, are dutifully carrying this narrative into Canada, the U.S., and the U.K., acting as downstream amplifiers.

3. Segments of the "woke Left" are uncritically boosting this falsehood, either out of ideological blindness or reflexive anti-India bias.

4. Elements of the "groyper Christian-Right" are also picking up this narrative. Despite their awareness of the dangers posed by radical Islam, many see attacking Hindus and India as an easy way to satisfy their egos and court outrage.

5. Chinese proxy accounts are further magnifying the chaos by promoting both the woke Left and far-Right versions of the narrative, using the disinformation to serve their broader geopolitical interests.

The pro-Hindu (and by extension, pro-India) social media response to the #PahalgamTerrorAttackis being driven by five major groups:

1. Global Leaders and Their Ecosystems
Both pro-West and pro-Russia (#BRICS) leaders, along with their networks in think tanks, business sectors, and non-legacy media, have voiced support. While some pro-Russian accounts are more cautious—due to their ideological overlaps with pro-Chinese and pro-Palestinian narratives—they have largely stood by Hindus, thanks to a more mature understanding of global geopolitics.

2. Pro-Jewish Voices
Pro-Jewish accounts see radical Islam as an existential threat not just to Israel, but to civilization at large. This shared perception has forged a natural alignment with Hindus in the aftermath of Pulwama.

3. European Nationalists
European conservatives, deeply aware of the demographic and security threats posed by unchecked Islamism in Europe—and frustrated by the global Left's inaction—view India as a vital civilizational bulwark. Their support for Hindus stems from a recognition of shared stakes in a broader civilizational battle.

4. Indians and the Global Hindutva Community
As the direct victims of the #PahalgamTerrorAttack, Indians and the global Hindu diaspora have responded with justified passion, grief, and calls for justice.

5. Ex-Muslims and Liberal Muslims
This group has emerged as one of the most powerful and credible allies of Hindus and India. Their personal journeys, lived experiences, and deep understanding of Islamist ideologies make them indispensable voices in the fight against jihadist extremism.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Azaad
  • Sticky
Islamic Extremism in India : News , Discussions & Updates.
34 35 36
Replies
713
Views
22K
vampyrbladez
vampyrbladez

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Share this Site

Back
Top