The purpose of calling your previous post, and for that matter, this reply, stupid is to point out the critical lack of understanding. Just cause something is technically feasible doesn't mean it is strategically sensible. MBRL systems are used for area suppression, not as a display of disproportionate power against a conventional enemy. The PHL 16 has 4 launch tubes, sure, but it is NOT a conventional MBRL. It is an MLRS!!!!! It launches tactical ballistic missiles. India has the Pralay, Prahar, and Pragati range of tactical missiles with 150-500 km range. The Pralay launch platform also has 6 launch tubes. Doesn't make it an MBRL!!!!!!!!
See where the stupidity lies?
Now, coming to the point of bombing the Rawalpindi GHQ. Bombing the Army HQ of a sovereign nation is an act of War. It cannot be done as a "psy op". It will have a military response of the highest order. And, just cause a country of 1.5 billion people with the fastest growing economy in the world isn't unilaterally bombing the enemy's GHQ even before War is declared, doesn't make India chicken-hearted.
Your enthusiasm and rage are fine, Sir. But you are grossly misinformed.
I usually don't like to use invectives. But I guess you cannot survive without swearing.
So,
Bloody hell, you jackass.
Have you even verified if the Pralay launcher has 6 launch tubes.
Give an official source for your assertion.
You stupid man, it has only a twin launcher configuration.
Are you an international authority on MBRL systems and should everyone follow your super wise diktats on strategies for MBRL use.
Don't try to impose your line of thinking on others.
You don't want the Pakistan GHQ to be bombed. Fine.
Be happy in your beliefs.
Do the Pakistanis play by the rules.
They killed an 83 year old grandmother in Pahalgam I believe.
If you want to dispute provide a good source.
I have no desire to debate further with a ego maniac.
If you desire to prolong the exchange with more abuses, I will respond in kind.
If you care to listen, don't reply to this message.