If you are certain that you will be killed, non cooperation is the best method. The key idea is to delay them.Have seen a retired serviceman's video doing the rounds on WhatsApp which calls into question why none of the several able bodied men fought back, maybe some of you have also seen it. I am not going to go and check back on this thread if it's been commented on but he says out of all of them only the pony operator supposedly fought back and he wasn't even threatened, rest of them just meekly did what they were told to and even dropped their pants when asked to. Even someone who charged at the terrorists and went for their guns could've prevented many of these deaths. When facing assault rifles though, even 2 serving men couldn't do anything probably also because they were with family so I'm not sure if it's as easy as this gentleman is saying it was to show some fight and not co-operate in that situation. It takes more than training but a particular frame of mind/temperament to deal with such situations which most city dwelling Indians just don't/won't have due to a lack of need.
SSG trained, not SSG themselves. That's the intent behind the leakThis is a very important development- An SSG commando behind the attack on our people.
A casus belli for the impending strikes. The strikes are likely not gonna be confined to LeT hideouts but will be directed at their handler akas i.e. Pak military.
SSG trained or SSG, the involvement of Pak military to send an asset to kill unarmed civilians should include them under the retaliation umbrellaSSG trained, not SSG themselves. That's the intent behind the leak
He is a former para commando of special forces. "Former" does not matter here.SSG trained, not SSG themselves. That's the intent behind the leak
SSG trained or SSG, the involvement of Pak military to send an asset to kill unarmed civilians should include them under the retaliation umbrella
Agreed. But I feels like GoI wants to make that distinction so attack can be against terrorists, not PAHe is a former para commando of special forces. "Former" does not matter here.
Its not a far fetched idea to bomb their headquarter actually. Every time they do some misadeventure we should respond by some heavy artillery and gradually ramp up the radius of our hammering. If we had responded in this manner to other attacks on our forces by openning up our long range artillery i am sure they would have caught the pattern and in a phalgam like attack we could have easily fired at their hq and reminded them they are in our reach.Please don't use adjectives like 'stupid'. Using any form of abuse even if very mild in nature means that you don't have convincing logical arguments.
First the Chinese have the MBRL systems like the PHL- 16 and the PCL- 191 which have ranges from 350 to 500 kms.
If the PLA has seen sense in developing these very long range MBRL systems, you cannot call the professionals in the PLA stupid for their efforts.
You personally may not agree with the idea. Fine, but don't use words like stupid to artificially inflate your IQ level.
If you want an American type response 'I care a damn about your arguments'.
The idea per se is technically feasible.
The flowery statement that 'you can't just bomb the headquarters of a nuclear state' shows that you are chicken hearted. Okay, I respect your opinion but please don't deride the opinion of others.
For God's sake - You cannot win the war by by bombing the Rawalpindi GHQ of the Pakistan Army. Its more about delivering psychological blows to the enemy and degrade his morale.
If we want to end this diplomatically we can say
'we agree to disagree'
Or if you prefer an exchange of abuses, so be it.
View: https://x.com/alpha_defense/status/1916398811544437065
most military "analysts" estimate pakistan does not have enough gas to fight beyond 2-3 weeks.