Pahalgam Islamic Terror Attack

Do you think a Military response going to happen?.

  • Total voters
    191
hit&run said:
hit&run

Post in thread 'Chit Chat'

karn said:
It was .. We used to say let indians in gelf make money off these beggars. With this it will increase their inflation.
Click to expand...
Dirty Bomb.
DFB is ahead of the curve.

View: https://x.com/manamuntu/status/1918925537567031566
Click to expand...

Planting such news means:

A chinese "insurance" for pak to avert a war or even prevent India from entering into pak even delay the prospects of it.

It could even be a planted int to confuse and delay the response from Bharath. The timing of such leak is epic.

Edit:
The international community knows pakistan will always shoot its own feet to blame it on others.
Nothing new in it.
 
haldilal said:
Ya'll Nibbiars sub humans,


View: https://x.com/YearOfTheKraken/status/1918938332865724910
Click to expand...

Avg desert bandit mindset. Nobody should be surprised.

These guys even forced their own soldiers to r*pe their own daughters & sisters in the name of "fixing nashal" during the 71 war. And their generals used to give medals to these soldiers medal for it while watching it with their own eyes. They are Rākṣasas/Demons not humans. Bunch of beasts in human skins.
 
Last edited:
spikey360 said:
Imagine USA building a dossier for the world to see before they invaded Afghanistan.
Imagine USA building "foolproof" evidence chain against Saddam WMD before invading Iraq.

Let's face it - dossier is a game of the weak, colonised mind. At this point, seeing the reaction of BJP in last 11 days - there is zero difference between their reaction and a hypothetical Congi reaction.
Click to expand...

That's exactly what they did.

Unless you were a kid when that went down, you would exactly how US & UK, their main leaders etc etc made a case.
They presented evidence of Saddam making WMD's and made a case for war against Iraq.

In fact these dossiers were presented by US and UK even in UN.

Btw, 9/11 happened in 2001, US invaded Iraq in 2003, after presenting dossiers and dossiers of evidence against Iraq to everyone in the world.
After 9/11, US declared invasion on Afg in October, a whole month later. The first attacks were air strikes only. Boots on ground came much later.

Anyone else snorting this guys shit needs their head examined.
 
haldilal said:
Ya'll Nibbiars sub humans,


View: https://x.com/YearOfTheKraken/status/1918938332865724910
Click to expand...


Bringing this point up again.

nongaddarliberal said:
The vast majority of even right wing Hindus have not yet come to the conclusion that there is absolutely nothing behind the surface in muzzies except jihad, lies, rape fantasies, desire to hold slaves and absolute contempt for other religions. They are one dimensional characters with no genuine morals, curiosity, human empathy or admiration of the human potential. Their mindset is extremely alien to a Hindu, so even disillusioned RW Hindus don't quite grasp the demonic depravity that is the Islamic paki mind. All your Arzoo Kazmis and whatever else, will at the end of the day support the same violence against Hindus as any ISIS or LeT terrorist.

Imagine going to another country that's giving you benefits and a new life, and systematically raping their innocent children while demanding more freebies, and then genuinely getting angry when the host people start noticing this, and cry Islamophobia. We cannot even begin to put ourselves in their inbred heads. We can only notice their patterns and act accordingly.

There's nothing behind the surface. They're just things that act out their pathetic programming.
Click to expand...
 
I hope this hasn’t been said here, but the “Chinese trap” theory is nonsense. The terror strikes in Kashmir are a local operation backed by Pakistan, not some grand external plot.
Abdulla’s rise to CM reignited a dormant terror network. His cadre quietly regained street control, setting the stage for violence. Post-Article 370, the terror ecosystem needed a major attack with strong communal messaging to spark a new cycle of unrest. I call this the “fair value gap”—their calculated move to exploit the new status quo.
“They” refers to the entire network: local operatives, their handlers, and Pakistan, their strategic fallback. For months, they’ve run test attacks—hitting civilians, security forces, then slipping into Pakistan or hiding in Kashmir undetected. These were rehearsals to perfect exit routes and logistics, with local support.
When Tahawwur Rana was extradited, I warned agencies: jihadis would ramp up to counter that win. And they did.
Blaming external players is a distraction. This is a local-Pakistani operation. If you shy away from hitting Pakistan, fearing a “Chinese trap,” you’re left targeting Kashmiris while peddling a false narrative of normalcy. It’s their bluff—securing the state, making truces, and allowing occasional attacks to keep the cycle alive.
 
spikey360 said:
I don't get what they like about dirty, smelly looking followers of desert cult.
Democrats have always favoured Muslims over even their own Christian brethren, so it is no surprise that a democrat pushing channel like CNN will organise chai-pe-charcha sessions with dirty smelly pigs.
Click to expand...

Right wing channels will also be more or less the same. India won't get the benefit of doubt that Israel/Russ/Ukr get from various quarters. Infact, most of the West probably sees this as 2 brown third-worlders fighting each other and is not even on their radar.

One shouldn't expect any support for either of them. And in a way that's good, it means it's not a global boiling point issue and there will be less attention paid.
 
Personally, after the attack, I also wanted the govt to teach them a lesson, but is it really a good approach? We should instead focus on the terrorists' sympathizers within the country, our economy and modernizing the military for threats like China.

Pakistan is non existent to me.

Perhaps, we can attack Pakistan several months later citing the country is plotting a terrorist attack against us?
 
BihariLala said:
Personally, after the attack, I also wanted the govt to teach them a lesson, but is it really a good approach? We should instead focus on the terrorists' sympathizers within the country, our economy and modernizing the military for threats like China.

Pakistan is non existent to me.

Perhaps, we can attack Pakistan several months later citing the country is plotting a terrorist attack against us?
Click to expand...

Both needs to happen.

It's not an option anymore.
 
concard said:
View attachment 33102

These inbreeds have such low IQ, it clearly shows in their knowledge whenever they post crap like this. So let's see their claim whether what they have claimed is true or not.

Claim: 4 IAF Rafales Jammed for 4 minutes by their air force.

There are 2 types of aircrafts which can Jam a sophisticated fighter Jet like Rafale. One is their fighter Jets and the other is their SAAB Erieye 2000 which is an AEW&C.

All their fighter Jets are single Engines. The chances of their old junk Mirage III, Mirage 5, and F7 have anything to do with this is NIL. These are old aircrafts from 1960's with no sophisticated electronics to speak off. Besides they won't be sending these old Junk to face off Rafale if they have a brain. So we can easily rule out these aircrafts out of this scenario.

This leaves us with F-16, JF-17, and J-10. As I have explained in my previous post, their F-16s are old. None of the F-16s are equipped with AESA radar. Just look up the engines powering F-16, JF-17, and J-10. They barely produce enough power for onboard Radar, avionics, and subsystems. For a single engine fighter jet to jam a double engine powered fighter jet, it needs to produce enough thrust to not only power the onboard electronics but also jamming equipment. These aircrafts are no F-35 to be producing such power. So there is no way any of their fighter Jets are capable of jamming a Rafale.

The only other aircraft is SAAB Erieye 2000 which is an Airborne Early warning and control(AEW&C). It is powered by a Turboprop not a Turbofan. It has a range detection of 450km. It's radar coverage is 300 degrees. There is 60 degrees gap which it cannot cover. For this aircraft to Jam Rafale it has to be within 450km range and the Rafale has to be within it's line of sight. Unless they are morons they would not be having a strategic asset like this aircraft flying anywhere close to the border given our air defenses.

SAAB Erieye 2000 is powered by AESA radar based on Gallium Arsenide(GaA) not on Gallium Nitride(GaN) which is more power efficient. The longer the distance between this aircraft and the target aircraft(Rafale) the more power you need to jam the target aircraft. I highly doubt a Turboprop would produce such immense power to jam an aircraft that far, and I highly doubt Rafale would be in it's line of sight for 4 minutes.

As usual it is Porki scums telling their sweet bed time stories to feel better at night.
Click to expand...

Retards just helping Rafales with updating its Spectra library. Rafale's are flying silent CAPs since a week to collect electronic intelligence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Azaad
  • Sticky
Islamic Extremism in India : News , Discussions & Updates.
37 38 39
Replies
777
Views
25K
Aaj Ka Hero
Aaj Ka Hero
haldilal
Islamic Invasion of Bharat
Replies
0
Views
131
haldilal
haldilal

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Share this Site

Back
Top