Russian Ukrainian War

[WW2historian]

Blah, blah, blah, bridges again.
Why is the Kerch Bridge still standing - large bridges are not easy to destroy. It would have to be a combined attack by BM, CМ (air, land and sea based) and kamikaze drones. Even this does not guarantee that the bridge will collapse. Such capital structures are destroyed by an internal explosion, but the Russian army does not control a single bridge on the Dnieper. What they controlled, they have already blown up.
Talk of a ceasefire is just a game until Trump understands that he will not win the Nobel Peace Prize.

Ukraine was able to destroy the Kherson bridge. Russia is very capable of destroying the bridges and doing so would help them, but I'll stick to me theory that they want to annihilate Ukraine's army and the current situation is perfect for them to slowly choke Ukraine to death. It's cold and ruthless, but effective. When this is over Ukraine won't ever be a threat to Russia again.

 

[Akim]

Ukraine was able to destroy the Kherson bridge. Russia is very capable of destroying the bridges and doing so would help them, but I'll stick to me theory that they want to annihilate Ukraine's army and the current situation is perfect for them to slowly choke Ukraine to death. It's cold and ruthless, but effective. When this is over Ukraine won't ever be a threat to Russia again.

Funny.
As for the Antonovsky (Kherson) bridge - Ukraine only damaged it, making it useless for delivering heavy equipment. The destruction of the spans is an internal explosion to stop the pursuit of fleeing Russian troops. Even the bombing of bridges in the Kursk region - the Russians threw bridge layers onto the destroyed spans and that's it. They are periodically destroyed and everything is repeated again, so your version is funny. The bridges across the Dnieper River were built during the Cold War and are designed to withstand the use of nuclear weapons. However, the dams too. It took less than a day to restore traffic through the Dnieper Hydroelectric Power Station when it was hit by an Kh-55. So let your friends from Russia continue to "pull the wool over your eyes", you saw the map and know the words of Kellogg.

 

[WW2historian]

Funny.
As for the Antonovsky (Kherson) bridge - Ukraine only damaged it, making it useless for delivering heavy equipment. The destruction of the spans is an internal explosion to stop the pursuit of fleeing Russian troops. Even the bombing of bridges in the Kursk region - the Russians threw bridge layers onto the destroyed spans and that's it. They are periodically destroyed and everything is repeated again, so your version is funny. The bridges across the Dnieper River were built during the Cold War and are designed to withstand the use of nuclear weapons. However, the dams too. It took less than a day to restore traffic through the Dnieper Hydroelectric Power Station when it was hit by an Kh-55. So let your friends from Russia continue to "pull the wool over your eyes", you saw the map and know the words of Kellogg.

Call it damaged, destroyed, or any other word you like. I'll say it's not useable at all which has the same effect as it being destroyed.

 

[WW2historian]

This is very interesting. I guess once again we will have to wait and see how economics plays out in this conflict.
s very critical the Russians are going
8:53
to lose huge market and a a part of
8:57
influence in the Western countries so
8:59
the Russians were thinking how to
9:01
resolve the issue how to force the
9:03
ukrainians to sign a contract in Russian
9:05
terms in Russian favor and uh at some
9:09
point of these discussions at some point
9:11
of this negotiation process the Russians
9:14
ask themself if the ukrainians are
9:17
planning to use uh us gas LNG if they're
9:21
going to replace Russian cheap gas with
9:24
us LNG then the question is what is the
9:28
purpose what is the need what is um kind
9:32
of value Ukrainian entire gas system can
9:35
bring to the Russians so there going to
9:38
be no value if the Russians are not able
9:40
to send their cheap gas to European
9:43
countries through Ukraine using
9:45
Ukrainian gas Transportation
9:48
infrastructure then the Russians see no
9:50
value of it and if the Russians don't
9:52
see any value from Ukrainian gas
9:55
Transportation St system then the
9:58
Russians can destroy
10:00
then this system becomes for the
10:03
Russians a legitimate military Target
10:06
and this is the thing that zilinski
10:07
didn't count it calculated in his
10:10
estimations in his brilliant idea to
10:13
make all these things because if the
10:15
Russians on the 1 of January began
10:18
bombing and attacking the Ukrainian gas
10:20
facilities gas infrastructure there are
10:22
very high risk that not just ukrainians
10:25
will be completely turned off from the
10:27
electricity ukrainians will lose gas at
10:30
all and nobody neither the Russians nor
10:33
the United States of America nor the
10:35
Western countries will be able to use
10:37
the Ukraine infrastructure to send gas
10:40
from one side to another and the most in
10:42
people regular people civilians schools
10:46
uh infrastructure buildings nobody
10:49
nothing in Ukraine will be able to use
10:51
gas because the infrastructure would be
10:54
completely destroyed and this is going
10:56
to be completely difficult to to
10:58
difficult to restore it this is the
11:01
situation and this is exactly what is
11:03
happening and this is the reason why the
11:05
ukrainians are holding the S direction
11:07
for so long because this is the moment
11:10
they will try to long this area just
11:13
until the negotiation about the contract
11:16
ends and obviously according to all


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGaNoYpo03Q

 

[Akim]

Call it damaged, destroyed, or any other word you like. I'll say it's not useable at all which has the same effect as it being destroyed. View attachment 19967

Are you retarded? At that time of the war we didn't have the necessary weapons. We made a colander out of one span of the bridge - cars and small trucks could pass through, but not heavier ones. This was done by the retreating Russians.

 

[Soldier35]

Residents of Ukraine have published footage of Russian cruise missiles Kh-101 hitting the Pridneprovskaya TPP in the city of Dnepropetrovsk. The video was filmed by several eyewitnesses from different angles on December 25. At the time of the missile attack, Ukrainian air defense was working, but the shot down missiles are not visible on the video. A total of 12 missile strikes were recorded in Dnepropetrovsk. The range of the Russian Kh-101 missile is up to 5,500 km, the warhead is 400 kg.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbZDOb4_tCM

It is possible that the Ukrainian Gepard air defense system, made in Germany, is firing at Russian missiles.
More about the Gepard air defense


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldHdlggZ7Ic

 

[WW2historian]

Are you retarded? At that time of the war we didn't have the necessary weapons. We made a colander out of one span of the bridge - cars and small trucks could pass through, but not heavier ones. This was done by the retreating Russians.
View attachment 20003

Did you wake up on the wrong side of your baby crib again? Yes, I now remember the Russian blowing up the bridge. When this war is over you should grow wheat, piss on it, and then sell it to the Russians. That will teach them not to invade your country.

 

[Akim]

Ukraine was able to destroy the Kherson bridge. Russia is very capable of destroying the bridges and doing so would help them, but I'll stick to me theory that they want to annihilate Ukraine's army and the current situation is perfect for them to slowly choke Ukraine to death. It's cold and ruthless, but effective. When this is over Ukraine won't ever be a threat to Russia again.

Our Commander-in-Chief said that this year Russia lost 410 thousand killed and wounded. You saw the map and the assault VAZ 2104 too. Your theory is wrong.

 

[WW2historian]

Our Commander-in-Chief said that this year Russia lost 410 thousand killed and wounded. You saw the map and the assault VAZ 2104 too. Your theory is wrong.

If Ukraine's commander in chief said Russia lost 410k then I totally believe it now. Thanks, I had my doubts, now I finally know the truth. BTW bloomberg picked up the story about the contract for LNG. Lets see if Zelensky will now sign the deal even though he previously said he would not. The pea brain idiot might realize that Russia will destroy the LNG transport and infrastructure of Ukraine if he doesn't sign it. It should be very entertaining to see.
"In making the decision, the Ukrainian leader must consider the need to protect the country’s 38,600-kilometer gas pipeline system. The network, among the world’s largest, has been spared attacks over the last three years as Russian gas has flowed though it. If that were to stop, the system might become a target for missile strikes, as gas storage facilities and power supplies have been. It would also create technical challenges that would make it difficult to heat homes across Ukraine during the winter.

“The issue of risks for Ukrainian infrastructure is reverberating in diplomatic discussions,” said Christian Egenhofer, senior researcher at the CEPS think-tank in Brussels. “It may prove a lifeline for Zelenskiy if he opts to allow for continued transit.”

At the same time, Egenhofer noted, “the gas talks will matter beyond Ukraine.”

Ukraine-Russia Gas Transit Deal At Critical Moment of Truth

The future of gas transit through Ukraine is at a turning point. If a last-minute deal isn’t struck by Wednesday, billions of cubic meters in gas flows could come to a halt.

www.bnnbloomberg.ca

 

[Akim]

If Ukraine's commander in chief said Russia lost 410k then I totally believe it now. Thanks, I had my doubts, now I finally know the truth. BTW bloomberg picked up the story about the contract for LNG. Lets see if Zelensky will now sign the deal even though he previously said he would not. The pea brain idiot might realize that Russia will destroy the LNG transport and infrastructure of Ukraine if he doesn't sign it. It should be very entertaining to see.
"In making the decision, the Ukrainian leader must consider the need to protect the country’s 38,600-kilometer gas pipeline system. The network, among the world’s largest, has been spared attacks over the last three years as Russian gas has flowed though it. If that were to stop, the system might become a target for missile strikes, as gas storage facilities and power supplies have been. It would also create technical challenges that would make it difficult to heat homes across Ukraine during the winter.

“The issue of risks for Ukrainian infrastructure is reverberating in diplomatic discussions,” said Christian Egenhofer, senior researcher at the CEPS think-tank in Brussels. “It may prove a lifeline for Zelenskiy if he opts to allow for continued transit.”

At the same time, Egenhofer noted, “the gas talks will matter beyond Ukraine.”

Ukraine-Russia Gas Transit Deal At Critical Moment of Truth

The future of gas transit through Ukraine is at a turning point. If a last-minute deal isn’t struck by Wednesday, billions of cubic meters in gas flows could come to a halt.

www.bnnbloomberg.ca

So we can also bomb the GTS in Russia. With n.gas inside, they will burn even better.