Soon they will unless paper tiger NATO surrender.
Remember what American vice president said, If America has not helped Ukraine then Russian Army would have been reached at Poland border.
Its worth listening to the various parties and reaching conclusion, when it involves objective facts.
1. Objective fact is, Russia rejected ceasefire.
That means Russia is confident in its ability to sustain war/its war capacity isnt sufficiently degraded for it to sue for peace and look for a way out.
2. Objective fact is, Ukraine didnt want peace negotation and got armtwisted into it by USA. This means Ukraine also thinks that it can sustain the war indefinitely and its war capacity isnt sufficiently degraded for it to sue for peace.
3. Objective fact is, USA wants immediate ceasefire. This means USA thinks its ability to sustain this war is NOT indefinite and its looking for exit ramps.
This means, the only logical conclusion is, this war is a war of attrition, not territory, where Russians are happy minimixing losses and grinding down the Ukronazis indefinitely, the Ukronazis are happy losing land at the rate of 2 inches per year and throwing people into meat-grinder but USA is not happy donating weapons and $$ to Ukraine for no results/negative results ( which it is, since Ukraine has been losing territory steadily since day1 of war, so by objective parameter, USA's involvement has yeilded negative results).
So this means, USA has doubts over Ukraine being able to use US aid efficiently and in reasonable manner to win the war, hence why it is the only party making the most noise about PLZZ STOP.