Russian Ukrainian War

I was researching what kind of damage this new Russia weapon may of caused. Visually it didn't look impressive because it was purely a kinetic energy explosion deep below the surface. Anyway, that one attack might of been equal to a 30 kilogram explosion, which is ten 3000 Fab bombs. He talks about this at the 16 minute mark.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iL7Hb0fcpbU
 
Can someone briefly explain to me how a hypersonic balistic missile is different from a ballistic missile? Has it got something to do with hypersonic speeds during boost phase?
Otherwise, all ballistic missiles are hypersonic during re-entry phase. So I was wondering what made Oreshnik so different.
 
Can someone briefly explain to me how a hypersonic balistic missile is different from a ballistic missile? Has it got something to do with hypersonic speeds during boost phase?
Otherwise, all ballistic missiles are hypersonic during re-entry phase. So I was wondering what made Oreshnik so different.
There's nothing different, both are same.
What is different are the warheads it carriers.
The missile is mirv(multiple independent reentry vehicle) capable.
The multiple warheads here are 6, carried by one missile.
The warheads themselves are MARV( manurable reentry vehicle) and each warhead further carries 6 sub warheads that finally explodes.
The ones russia used seems to be deep penetrators but pretty sure they can also be configured as surface or even aerial explosive.
So a single missile with conventional warheads can destroy multiple targets(36) in a half a kilometer area.
Previously you need 10-15 missiles for that, which was quite expensive beacuse those 10-15 missiles have 10-15 engines combined, 10-15 fuselages with fuel, many sensors etc.
So one missile can now destroy a area which needed 10-15 missiles to destroy, now this missile is much bigger than the ones you would use, but still pretty cheap compared to using multiple missiles.
 
What? Where? Don't call every bottle rocket an ATACMS. I don't see any ATACMS in that clip. If you really want to show something then why don't you tell your overlords to put out a video that shows that the Oreshnik was a dud. Put out a video of the Yuzhmash plant.
Do you have any proof that ATACMS visited Bryansk last time or just the words of a crazy Kremlin elder?
 
Biden's statement.
Then there is the statement of the Kursk governor that they shot down two ATACMS. But the Russians have such a speech policy, they always make such statements when everything around is burning. Have you seen the video of the Rostov governor denying everything against the backdrop of a burning oil depot?
When Trump ordered the bombing of Syria, they also filmed stories that the damage from the Tomahawks was minimal.
 
Footage of a Russian Iskander-M missile hitting a Ukrainian MiG-29 fighter jet, made in the Soviet Union, has been published. The video was filmed at the Dnepr military airfield. The strike was carried out by a 9M723-K5 missile equipped with a cluster warhead. The video shows an air burst and the missile's precise hit on the target. Presumably, a missile with a 9E436 optical seeker was used, the probable deviation from the target is then 5-20 meters. As a result of the Iskander-M missile strike, the MiG-29 was destroyed, and ground personnel were reportedly also injured. It is worth noting that there are versions that there was a mock-up of the aircraft at the airfield. The explosion does not look like a cluster missile, but this is what the Ministry of Defense reported. Perhaps this is an unknown type of cluster warhead, they are made by two factories.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Minpx7G2xPk
 
Then there is the statement of the Kursk governor that they shot down two ATACMS. But the Russians have such a speech policy, they always make such statements when everything around is burning. Have you seen the video of the Rostov governor denying everything against the backdrop of a burning oil depot?
When Trump ordered the bombing of Syria, they also filmed stories that the damage from the Tomahawks was minimal.
Biden and his bunch of retards did not announce any new ATACMS strike.
 
Then continue to believe Putler, who talks about a new missile with electronics from the 80s. :)
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha...... the washing machine trope again. Probably these are from the same washing machines stolen from Ukraine.

BTW I see that you still did not comment on: https://www.wsj.com/business/energy...ng-to-buy-nord-stream-2-gas-pipeline-f43dd85d

Soon the americans will buy, repair and put NS2 back online. After that no need of Ukraine for gas transit. Heehehehehehehehehehehehehehehe........
 
That's why I said that we can do without US help. It will be hard, but not fatal.
This year, until the second ten days of April, there was no American help, but the Russians continue to storm the town of Chasov Yar.
In principle, they assumed a bad scenario with American help, and that's why many underground factories are opening. Rheinmetall alone is opening 4 of them, one of them is already working.
That's why the Russians attack Odesa every night, using mopeds with thermobars. They want to get into the catacombs.
Odesa catacombs
View attachment 15017
Like being underground makes any difference. What do you think just happened with Russia's new weapon? This is nothing new, the US had these weapons and used them against Iraq over 30 years ago. Just to give you some math to think about. These weapons hit the target at 3000 meters a second, the weapons that the US used as bunker busters travel at 450 meters a second. At 3000 MPS would release over 40 times more kinetic energy than the equivalent weight at 450 meters a second. Yes the US weapons had much more weight to them and exploded at a depth at over 150 ft. These new weapons are different and not much is known about it. However the same pattern is happening again, Russian's are stupid, and this weapon is all bark and no bite. I think this weapon destroyed the underground factory completely. The Russians learned a few things in the last 30 years, and I can guess they improved such weapons by a huge amount.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJTq9yb_Zow
 
That's why I said that we can do without US help. It will be hard, but not fatal.
This year, until the second ten days of April, there was no American help, but the Russians continue to storm the town of Chasov Yar.
In principle, they assumed a bad scenario with American help, and that's why many underground factories are opening. Rheinmetall alone is opening 4 of them, one of them is already working.
That's why the Russians attack Odesa every night, using mopeds with thermobars. They want to get into the catacombs.
Odesa catacombs
View attachment 15017
How are they going to get large weapons to the surface from these catacombs? They might make a nice shelter, but as a factory? Only you would think that, but I can see them as a safe place to produce small arms like sub-machine guns. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odesa_catacombs
 
The west is in shock, but not I. Too funny, these western leaders are so clueless.
 
The west is in shock, but not I. Too funny, these western leaders are so clueless.
Don't worry soon "democracy" will be in danger in Romania and then the machines will start playing tricks in round 2.
 
Like being underground makes any difference. What do you think just happened with Russia's new weapon? This is nothing new, the US had these weapons and used them against Iraq over 30 years ago. Just to give you some math to think about. These weapons hit the target at 3000 meters a second, the weapons that the US used as bunker busters travel at 450 meters a second. At 3000 MPS would release over 40 times more kinetic energy than the equivalent weight at 450 meters a second. Yes the US weapons had much more weight to them and exploded at a depth at over 150 ft. These new weapons are different and not much is known about it. However the same pattern is happening again, Russian's are stupid, and this weapon is all bark and no bite. I think this weapon destroyed the underground factory completely. The Russians learned a few things in the last 30 years, and I can guess they improved such weapons by a huge amount.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJTq9yb_Zow

Notice one thing about the engineers in the video. The main reason the bombs worked. Nowadays it is hard to pull out such a feat.
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top