Russian Ukrainian War


View: https://x.com/Maks_NAFO_FELLA/status/1869461230823567740
The Soviet Union could afford such tactics, the Russian Empire could afford such tactics, but not modern Russia. Now Russia does not have powerful allies like in WW1 and WW2.

if Ukrainian losses are 31k still, then the 5x russian losses might hold, else, its just PURE BS.
Maybe we can have a hint from no. of freshly dug cemeteries in both countries to have a picture more clearer.

@Akim Got any from your side?
@Soldier35 , and your side too.
 
You do not have AD, No air force, No cruise missiles, and No enough even artillery but still, Russia is losing more soldiers than Ukraine.

What kind of logic is this ??
These are the miracles - there is nothing, but the front did not collapse.
Maybe it's time to stop listening to Russian propaganda and turn on your brain?
By the way, about air defense...

View: https://x.com/visegrad24/status/1869541246106272130
if Ukrainian losses are 31k still, then the 5x russian losses might hold, else, its just PURE BS.
Maybe we can have a hint from no. of freshly dug cemeteries in both countries to have a picture more clearer.

@Akim Got any from your side?
@Soldier35 , and your side too.

Will you personally count each of the graves? I already gave you a hint: Monitor local Telegram channels. They report any death in the region.
It takes a long time, but it is objective.
But you are unlikely to do this. After all, you do not even follow the general update of information. On December 7, Zelensky named the casualty figures.
photo_2024-12-08_14-35-58.webp
 
These are the miracles - there is nothing, but the front did not collapse.
Maybe it's time to stop listening to Russian propaganda and turn on your brain?
By the way, about air defense...

View: https://x.com/visegrad24/status/1869541246106272130


Will you personally count each of the graves? I already gave you a hint: Monitor local Telegram channels. They report any death in the region.
It takes a long time, but it is objective.
But you are unlikely to do this. After all, you do not even follow the general update of information. On December 7, Zelensky named the casualty figures.
View attachment 18929


Ukraine has 43k loss only??

Dumb Akim, even Ursula has admitted 100k loss 3 years back. I think you need to wake up.
 
Ukraine has 43k loss only??

Dumb Akim, even Ursula has admitted 100k loss 3 years back. I think you need to wake up.
Yebat' ty konchennoye chmo!
I don't have the task of trying to convince you and other pro-Russian crap. I'm sure you haven't helped Russia with even one bullet and are now descending into the " believe it or not" category. Who is Ursula von der Leyen? She is our partner, but not the Commander-in-Chief. She doesn't receive all the information directly. Zelensky announced these figures and they are official. All other information is secondary. I don't think Kellogg relies on our data. The Americans have their own intelligence.
 

View: https://x.com/Maks_NAFO_FELLA/status/1869461230823567740
The Soviet Union could afford such tactics, the Russian Empire could afford such tactics, but not modern Russia. Now Russia does not have powerful allies like in WW1 and WW2.

Fine Akim, let's assume those are real facts. The next logical questions for these "honest" guys would be..."Ukraine must be fully taken by Russia before they attack Poland or some other NATO country, at that point Russia will of lost 3 million men, but you have said if Ukraine loses, NATO countries are next, are you lying about that? Or is that a scare tactic? It would seem after such huge losses Russia wouldn't do such a thing, which really suggests another western narrative. Which is to use Ukraine to weaken Russia so they don't attack a NATO country. The two narrative contradict each other. So which narrative is the truth?
Anyone trusting the west has to be very naïve.
 
Fine Akim, let's assume those are real facts. The next logical questions for these "honest" guys would be..."Ukraine must be fully taken by Russia before they attack Poland or some other NATO country, at that point Russia will of lost 3 million men, but you have said if Ukraine loses, NATO countries are next, are you lying about that? Or is that a scare tactic? It would seem after such huge losses Russia wouldn't do such a thing, which really suggests another western narrative. Which is to use Ukraine to weaken Russia so they don't attack a NATO country. The two narrative contradict each other. So which narrative is the truth?
Anyone trusting the west has to be very naïve.

Each country has its own interests. There is no collective West, etc. I am very skeptical of Trump, although 44% of Ukrainians believe in his actions. From the very beginning, I said that we are a dielectric between Russia and the rest of Europe. Unfortunately, democracy depends on voters and most of the population does not want to sacrifice their comfort for the sake of increasing military production. The closer the countries are to Russia, the better they understand. Look how quickly Poland has rearmed. The small Baltic countries are also planning, but they know that they will not be able to resist Russia.
My answer is formulated as a question. If the war ends in our defeat, do you think Putin will be able to send his soldiers home? To work for 20-30 thousand rubles, when in the war he gets 200 thousand + the loot. I doubt this option very much. You have an example - "Wagner" in Syria. They did not return home, they simply moved and began to plunder Africa. There were only 10 thousand of them. There are 700,000 healthy men here who have tasted the adrenaline of a real war. Putin will restore his army and continue the war. The only chance is to defeat him and for that we need more weapons.
I don't know how Biden distributed the money, but we had a constant shortage of weapons. Only now, when he decided to spend the last 6 billion from this package, they are coming to us in a continuous stream.
 
Last edited:
Yebat' ty konchennoye chmo!
I don't have the task of trying to convince you and other pro-Russian crap. I'm sure you haven't helped Russia with even one bullet and are now descending into the " believe it or not" category. Who is Ursula von der Leyen? She is our partner, but not the Commander-in-Chief. She doesn't receive all the information directly. Zelensky announced these figures and they are official. All other information is secondary. I don't think Kellogg relies on our data. The Americans have their own intelligence.


If average Ukrainian like you are so dumb then I don't wonder Ukraine is heading towards total annihilation.

Who is Ursula Von der?? She is Zelensky's mommy. hence your grandmother.

NATO is operating war in Ukraine not the joker called Zelensky.

Neither I want to convince you anything dumb Akim. We are often force to reply due to your persistent stupidity.
 
If average Ukrainian like you are so dumb then I don't wonder Ukraine is heading towards total annihilation.

Who is Ursula Von der?? She is Zelensky's mommy. hence your grandmother.

NATO is operating war in Ukraine not the joker called Zelensky.

Neither I want to convince you anything dumb Akim. We are often force to reply due to your persistent stupidity.
You, [DELETED AS INAPPRIOPRIATE], can not answer.
I do not speak with the citizens of Russia, there is a complete lack of logic there and they do not ask the question "How has the SМO, which was supposed to last 2-3 weeks, been going on for almost three years already?". But I saw that they are not the only ones who are sick. Many here do not want to hear the truth and shout about our lack of air defense, aviation, etc., although tonight not one of the 85 "mopeds" reached their target.

View: https://x.com/arma_rez/status/1868614731382366712
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@Akim, refrain from using abusive language when making posts in response. Modify your post as that sort of language is unnecessary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKC
You, as a sucker of Putin's dick, can not answer.
I do not speak with the citizens of Russia, there is a complete lack of logic there and they do not ask the question "How has the SМO, which was supposed to last 2-3 weeks, been going on for almost three years already?". But I saw that they are not the only ones who are sick. Many here do not want to hear the truth and shout about our lack of air defense, aviation, etc., although tonight not one of the 85 "mopeds" reached their target.

View: https://x.com/arma_rez/status/1868614731382366712

I could post at least 10 similar pictures, but times it by at least 10 to get the full picture. Can you please explain the military strategy of Ukraine? Why do they allow themselves to get surrounded all the time? Seems to me that Russia isn't losing 5x more soldiers than Ukraine. If anything its the opposite. 1734617929892.webp
 
The first real North Korean 170-mm M1989 Koksan self-propelled guns were recorded by eyewitnesses on one of the military trains in Russia. There is little information about the M-1989 Koksan self-propelled guns; they were created in the 1970s on the chassis of T-54, T-62 or Type 59 tanks. With a 170-mm gun, more than 58 calibers long, the M1989 DPRK self-propelled gun can fire shells at a range of up to 40 km, and active-rocket projectiles at a range of up to 60 km.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruoM4Xhe740
 
@Akim, refrain from using abusive language when making posts in response. Modify your post as that sort of language is unnecessary.
Is it because I'm white?:):)
Notice, I wasn't the first to start personal insults, insults to the entire nation. Shouts about our poverty, forgetting about their MiG-21s at the airfields.
Romania wanted to give us their modernized MiG-21s, but we refused.
 
The first real North Korean 170-mm M1989 Koksan self-propelled guns were recorded by eyewitnesses on one of the military trains in Russia. There is little information about the M-1989 Koksan self-propelled guns; they were created in the 1970s on the chassis of T-54, T-62 or Type 59 tanks. With a 170-mm gun, more than 58 calibers long, the M1989 DPRK self-propelled gun can fire shells at a range of up to 40 km, and active-rocket projectiles at a range of up to 60 km.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruoM4Xhe740

I wonder if the west will run out of copium after seeing this. This was posted by a NAFO fellow, and from the replies I see they are really smoking the copium in huge amounts. I suggested to them to have a new fund. Instead of by me a coffee, please buy me some copium, I'm almost out.
View: https://x.com/Maks_NAFO_FELLA/status/1869741612672434354
 
Last edited:
I could post at least 10 similar pictures, but times it by at least 10 to get the full picture. Can you please explain the military strategy of Ukraine? Why do they allow themselves to get surrounded all the time? Seems to me that Russia isn't losing 5x more soldiers than Ukraine. If anything its the opposite. View attachment 18973
Is this enough of an answer?
Ge_yfbHXYAAQ-nY.webp
 
It answers that Russia won't allow itself to be encircled, but not the part about why Ukraine does.
48986-main.webp
This is what "many captures" means. Show me a modern photograph of this? Playing with the scale of the map, you can create an illusion, but in fact that area is defended by a platoon, a company at most. So here we need to clarify at what cost the Russians have to create such a pocket? Kellogg answered this question.
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

VPN-HSL-250-X250
Back
Top