- Joined
- Apr 26, 2025
- Messages
- 3
- Likes
- 12
80% of water to Pakistan reduced, by this program. Is it accurate?
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrnAKuGcnyQ
Chup be desh drohi.This one is a crash from China
Its a J-10S
Chinese fighter jet rumored to have crash-landed on river in Henan Province
80% from 1 river.Absolute hocum. That is physically impossible. How can you reduce 80% of THAT much water flow? It is not like India would have built secret dams and diversion channels. You can't hide that shit in the scale needed to divert 80% of water that comes under the IWT.
Do you know how much water the Indus River has? It is the primary one, which is why the treaty is called the INDUS water treaty. Additionally, if we had diverted 80% of the Indus' water, Pakistan would have already launched nuclear missiles. Diverting 80% of the Indus would bring Pakistan to a standstill. No water for anything. All hydroelectric power stations come to a stop. No drinking water throughout the country. If this were true, there would be fallout in Pakistan, and we'd have gotten to know that WAY before Arnab and his band of klazomaniacs had the chance to invite Pakistanis on their show to scream at them.80% from 1 river.
Indus river.
The are many other Rivers.
There is no China angle to this whole episode. Our side should stop hallucinating about tool kits, ekonomy and great games whenever the slightest incident takes place. Padosis and trashmiri terrorists have enough agency to act by themselves.Pakistan is China's Ukraine and Munir is their Zelensky.
Think about it... What better way to distract us from wrapping up the trade deal with Trump this summer and moving consumer tech supply chains and other low hanging fruits like shoes, sneakers, textiles ityadi where US companies are keen to move out of Vietnam, BD and Cheen.
Having said that, I'd rather we go for an aar-ya-paar ki ladaai this time and khatam karo this nautanki once and for all. Need to be ready, as a people, to absorb the blow... We may lose a 1000-2000 men and material damage to our industrial base... But we'd have defanged terroristan (hopefully broken into 3-4 pieces) and we will come out on the other side of the tandav as a nation others will take seriously.
Power only respects power.
I don't understand this unnecessary jingoism going on around this. Even ex-military personnel are shouting like the dogs of war that Pakistan wants to portray us as. The real strategists are calm and collected. Even on this thread, people need to understand that the only viable way to destroy a country from its roots is to rot its economy into oblivion. We've seen the US try and do a military takeover and what the consequences have been. We are the people of Kautilya. The steps that have been taken till now will choke Pakistan in the next 10 years if they don't fix themselves. Then they won't have even the most basic natural resources. That's the real game here. And there will be substantial kinetic action, possibly to take back PoK, and done in a way that dwarfs whatever Pakistan can retaliate with so that the Pakistani terror apparatus is shamed and essentially rendered crippled, both in terms of public support and capability. And something of this nature has to be a very calibrated military action. The nuclear deterrent always has to be kept in mind. We, in our jingoism assume that Paki warheads in Chinese missiles are worthless but military strategists cannot afford that luxury.
There is a larger geopolitical game brewing here. But the game doesn't predate the attack, rather, it is counting on India's retaliation to the attack. Remember, China has the BRO projects running through PoK that give China an alternative land route to a port (Karachi) in the event that the Strait of Malacca is blocked. Shutting down that major logistical pathway can pay massive strategic dividends to the US in a confrontation with China, which btw, is also brewing.There is no China angle to this whole episode. Our side should stop hallucinating about tool kits, ekonomy and great games whenever the slightest incident takes place. Padosis and trashmiri terrorists have enough agency to act by themselves.
If retaliation does not occur, larger terrorist attacks are likely to happen in the future. Continuous terrorist attacks cause far greater loss of life and economic damage than a full-scale war ever would.I don't understand this unnecessary jingoism going on around this. Even ex-military personnel are shouting like the dogs of war that Pakistan wants to portray us as. The real strategists are calm and collected. Even on this thread, people need to understand that the only viable way to destroy a country from its roots is to rot its economy into oblivion. We've seen the US try and do a military takeover and what the consequences have been. We are the people of Kautilya. The steps that have been taken till now will choke Pakistan in the next 10 years if they don't fix themselves. Then they won't have even the most basic natural resources. That's the real game here. And there will be substantial kinetic action, possibly to take back PoK, and done in a way that dwarfs whatever Pakistan can retaliate with so that the Pakistani terror apparatus is shamed and essentially rendered crippled, both in terms of public support and capability. And something of this nature has to be a very calibrated military action. The nuclear deterrent always has to be kept in mind. We, in our jingoism assume that Paki warheads in Chinese missiles are worthless but military strategists cannot afford that luxury.
It's quite obvious.Then modi should have kept quite and just made one tweet, his speech at bihar rally points out that he himself wants to avenge this
there are many nations who will run to it's rescue, this will never happen. I have heard this for yearsal-Bakistan must cease to exist as a coherent entity. There must be demilitarization & de-islamification of al-Bakistan .