- Joined
- Jul 1, 2024
- Messages
- 393
- Likes
- 3,808
A idea up for discussion.
Usually in SEAD operations the ground based radars are the top priority.
Destroy all enemy high capacity radars.
Once the radars have been destroyed, the accompanying SAM's become almost orphans. Yes, many SAM's have seekers but you need to first aim the missile in the general direction of the intruding aircraft or missile. The on-board seeker can then try to get a fix if it manages to get close enough to the target.
Without the radar systems SAM's may well become useless.
Now in order to minimise the vulnerability of SAM's why not store the missiles in underground hardened shelters with sliding steel doors. Blast proof. Of course a really powerful conventional or nuclear blast can damage even the hardened shelters.
Now is it technically impossible for a airborne radar like the AWACS with 360 degrees scan, track etc capability to take control of an SAM missile which is fired vertically up from an underground launch pad and then guide the missile to the target. It can probably work for at least countering fighter aircraft. Ballistic missiles with their high apogee flight paths probably cannot be tracked by AWACS radars.
One limitation is that AWACS radars can't match the capabilities of large, powerful ground based radars.
But I guess something is better than nothing.
I guess fighter aircraft and cruise missiles can be tracked by AWACS systems.
What are the advantage of the proposed strategy.
One, since the SAM's will be in protected underground launch pads they cannot be easily destroyed. Another is, even if above ground radars are neutralised the
AWACS will still be there to ensure that the Air Defence System is operational.
Yes, the AWACS can also be shot down but by virtue of it being a highly mobile platform it has a better chance of surviving.
Usually powerful, large ground radar stations are fixed whose positions can be pin pointed by the enemy ISR aircraft or satellites. Enemy aircraft know their location and will try to avoid flying near them.
Now, concealed underground SAM launch pads can be established in different locations which the enemy may not be aware of. What is needed is an AWACS to be present in the area to detect the intruder and then guide the SAM fired from the underground launch pad towards the target. Since the launch pads are underground and camouflaged nothing will be seen or detected by enemy surveillance assets. So an element of surprise can be established. The enemy fighter will be confidently flying over terrain which apparently has no overground radar installations and SAM's but will be ambushed by an SAM suddenly appearing from an undetected underground launch pad.
Well, is this science fiction or technologically possible. I had raised this idea earlier too.
None of what you written is science fiction. By placing SAM's under hardened shelters you are literally giving the enemy enough reason to believe there is something of high value you are hiding there. SAM's are meant to be mobile, they are not meant to stay in the same place. Some big SAM's like the ones which can intercept ballistic missiles are usually kept underground in dense green cover setting. These things are expensive to maintain, pain in the ass actually.
Think about our SSBNs, it carries nukes and it is always hidden lurking under water. Since it's role is defensive it needs to be extra careful where it is going. During conflict it needs to be ready to fire nuclear tipped ballistic missile if the enemy takes out our nuclear missiles and installations. All in all it is stressful to maintain missiles hidden whether it is in submarines sailing underwater or underground. The stressful part here is not so much about financial, it is mainly about command and control. This is the reason US, Russia, France, China build aircrafts to carry nukes. They don't want to be reliant on some under bunker to do the job.