DRDO and PSUs

Mail-SPL-468-X60-2x
In one of them navy books by GM Hiranandani.

There is a whole section where the navy wanted to buy torpedo tube launched anti ship missiles because the Piglets were going to get Harpoons from the US.

This was during the 80s-90s and we wanted for our Type 209 subs, the ((( Frenchman ))) was doing non-committal drama of maybe zhey will sell it to us with the contract for buying sous-marines from them( dalali for Scorpene going on since decades before ).

The missile in question was the Exocet

It ends with a lot of "GET IT IN WRITING" and after the writing they had to get it signed by the French, that they would sell missiles to IN without the pre-condition of buying french submarines.

i.e the Admirals of the day knew the proclivities of the French, so we can't say that the Forces/Baboodom/Dhotis ko chutiya banaya

TLDR the French are weasels, you need a good set of lawyers to make to contract with crisp language and strict penalties included so that they don't dance over it later on.

If muh help with Kaveri by Safran is legit, all the type of "help" needs to be specified and penalties also have to be specified
has safran even helped in the audit? all the things is said was like available on internet, we all knew metallurgy and weight reduction is the problem, TET needs to be increased and creep strength needs to increased, coatings and cooling holes

each and everything available, what input did they give? these forenmaal lobby aka chandigarh lobby needs to be executed

fuck burgerland, frenchfries and vodka

samosa best
 
In 2017 SAFRAN Audit given greenlit for testing the engine in Fighter plane. By early 2020-21 GTRE started to ask for MIG29 to test the engine. The answer from GOI is big NO. They asked for FTB. The answer is NO. They asked for Lab facility, the answer is NO. Did they give money for GTRE. The answer is big NO.

RD-33 is an poor engine, with poor MTBO. Both IAF and IN have poor experience with that engine. The baseline Kaveri produce the same output as RD-33. Already the engine is on flight test in Russia and brahmos corporation is working on Afterburner section for now. The dry thrust requirement is already achieved 54KN. It is matter of time to test the engine with Afterburner.

Spend the damn money man on your engine. Otherwise you will wait for some Russians, Americans to give the engines which will be comes with own complications. The Russians will ask for higher cost for ToT. The Americans will have terms and conditions and whims of Dems/Republics.

It hardly takes 5 years to build this engine. This is the engine using 2rd Gen materials. We already have 3rd Gen material in the DMS4. Just pour money like chinese and get that engine.

Even an stripped out AMCA with External weapons bay with this engine can do the job. It will be our own Twin engine 4.5 Gen aircraft.
dry version rn produces 51kn, just short, of the goal

and yes, kaveri anyday is much better than smoke chimney engines
 
What is K-LCA engine ? Is it the engine with Brahmos Afterburner or just KDE ?

I read about it in Strategic Frontier Forum

need to ask saurav jha or sriram on iah, can someone tweet him?

if klca is being discusses then maybe both the dry and full version got tested on high altitude testbed and flying testbed
again i am not sure, better to ask them or shreedhar singh or shirobarks
 
has safran even helped in the audit? all the things is said was like available on internet, we all knew metallurgy and weight reduction is the problem, TET needs to be increased and creep strength needs to increased, coatings and cooling holes

each and everything available, what input did they give? these forenmaal lobby aka chandigarh lobby needs to be executed

fuck burgerland, frenchfries and vodka

samosa best

Aside from putting in contract at some point we need to steal and reverse engineer and do industrial espionage if we're serious about making a world class engine.
This is aside from big budget for the development and infrastructure purchase for it.

Main problem of Kaveri is it is a half-assed time pass project and totally not serious, just like Tejas or anything aerospace
 
you think we aint doing this? my friend has his mama in cvrde, and believe me, they have learnt a lot but not at a level like the chinese
but they have to be careful to not bring it in light at international level or its over for us

each and every country does some level of espionage remotely or at their labs
Aside from putting in contract at some point we need to steal and reverse engineer and do industrial espionage if we're serious about making a world class engine.
This is aside from big budget for the development and infrastructure purchase for it.

Main problem of Kaveri is it is a half-assed time pass project and totally not serious, just like Tejas or anything aerospace
 
VPN-HSL-468-X60-2x

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top