Indian Politics and Democracy

Mail-SPL-468-X60-2x
Just saw Swati Chaturvedi now works at NDTV. That explains her anti-pork and sudden right leaning stance. I guess 2 more consecutive BJP terms, with an iron fist on funding will force a lot of loony leftist media personnel to move towards the centre.
But the challenge remains in academia, need to make arts, humanities more India-centric. Or else the brainwashing will continue.
 

Roadshow and open arms: Karnataka gang rape accused get heroes' welcome after bail​


Names of the accused

The accused – identified as Aftab Chandanakatti, Madar Saab Mandakki, Samiwulla Lalanavar, Mohammad Sadiq Agasimani, Shoib Mulla, Tausif Choti, and Riyaz Savikeri – were released on bail by the Haveri sessions court after the survivor failed to positively identify them in court.

This is just a demo of what will happen if ever Leaderji doesn't win a national election.
 

Roadshow and open arms: Karnataka gang rape accused get heroes' welcome after bail​


Names of the accused



This is just a demo of what will happen if ever Leaderji doesn't win a national election.
Because they're heroes in Islam.
You will find no Muslim voicing against it. Not a single one.
Had such happened by Hindus, Hindus would've made it to the world media, dehumanising the whole Hinduism.
These Katuas play hide & seek. We all know that how they're obsessed with celebrating criminalistic stuffs.
 
Because they're heroes in Islam.
You will find no Muslim voicing against it. Not a single one.
Had such happened by Hindus, Hindus would've made it to the world media, dehumanising the whole Hinduism.
These Katuas play hide & seek. We all know that how they're obsessed with celebrating criminalistic stuffs.

From the article it seems they gang r@ped a girl from their own qaummunity, because she was seeing a kuffar nibba in a hotel.

Anyway this is the end result of people voting on the basis of muh language and muh caste and muh freebies onlee.

OTOH KA Bhajipao is self combusting so there is no light at the end of the tunnel.

The more the greens are appeased the more they go out of control
 

I have a better question: what moron God makes 'man in his own image' and then forgets to do little tiny plastic surgery to get rid of foreskin and makes it a COMMAND to us humans to cut it off ??? God was in a hurry and couldnt finish making man in his own image and forgot to snip away extra skin ? God is not capable of surgery that jews did 3000 years ago ?!
Wtf.
 

What would be the reaction of a certain samudaay vhishesh if only their religious institutions were taxed i wonder?

Also what is the President supposed to do, can she legally say NO and send the bill back?
Can she sit on it to the eternal seething of the meelards and their 3 month deadline
 

What would be the reaction of a certain samudaay vhishesh if only their religious institutions were taxed i wonder?

Also what is the President supposed to do, can she legally say NO and send the bill back?
Can she sit on it to the eternal seething of the meelards and their 3 month deadline

Siddaramaiah will tax temples to make up for his budget shortfall and then celebrate Tipu jayanti with that money. Absolute scumbag of the highest order.
 
This is a brilliant post. I agree with every sentence, every word, and even every comma :)

We as a nation have failed to recognize the perils of exposing our population to Western propaganda. We have failed to give our population a civilizational narrative (talking point); this leaves them open to adopting foreign narratives. Obviously these foreign narratives are designed to destroy the civilizational pride we may still possess. Only people who are in the position to do something about it are elites and government officials; unfortunately though, both of these groups are oblivious to the problem.

"we" didn't do this to ourselves, this kind of guilt tripping is what i am saying has been systematically introduced into Indian society, it didn't happen on it's own. accelerated first by bollywood, and post emergency when education system went into the hands of commies, third wave in my view is post GFC which coincides with aman ki tamasha.
 

View: https://twitter.com/desimojito/status/1926295719276695866?s=19


View: https://twitter.com/KanchanGupta/status/1926381319115645232?s=19






[This post has been triggered by @desimojito ]

Economis tKaushik Basu's alma mater St Stephen's College was witness to extraordinary happenings, including "Reactionary teachers, we will have your skin for shoes for the poor!" scrawled on the blackboard of a lecture hall, during the turbulent 1969-71.
Some 30 boys, in their late teens, who called each other 'Comrade', took off to join the Naxal Revolution and found themselves back of beyond in the wilderness of east India where, to their horror, they discovered the extreme discomfort of having to defecate in fields while constantly looking over their shoulders to ensure a cop was not sneaking up with his finger on the trigger of his 303 rifle.


To be shot in the back, as most Naxals who were killed by the police were, was considered a 'Red Badge of Honour'. There was no such honour if you were shot in the back while defecating in the open.

They also discovered that drawing water from a well to bathe and wash their clothes -- of which they hadn't a clue -- required considerable physical effort. Most of them were down with dysentery within days of joining the Revolution; others wrote pitiful letters home, begging their well-connected parents to rescue them.


Among them was a wide-eyed, stick-thin nerdy student with milk bottle glasses. He sent a post card home, telling his parents, naturally upper-crust, naturally old money, naturally owners of a large Kolkata mansion with character -- gently shabby, with shuttered windows and mildewed walls, enveloped in the slightly sour odor of rising damp, much like the house in Mr Basu's post -- not to look for him as he was now one with the proletariat. If they wished to have a glimpse of him, they could come watch him and his comrades welcoming the People's Liberation Army at Brigade Parade Ground.


Enter the admittedly notorious Calcutta Police officer Runu Guha Neogi who had an impeccable, though impeachable, reputation of tracking down Naxals, a reputation that was carved in stone when he hunted down Charu Mazumdar (who died a mysterious death in custody).


Runu Guha Neogi had built his fear-inducing reputation mostly on the basis of information gathered by doing unspeakable things to young Naxals who couldn't run fast enough when the police raided their homes.


Somewhere near St Xavier's College was an old Calcutta mansion, also like the one you see in Mr Basu's post, where information was extracted from these petrified revolutionaries who would start squealing on their comrades at the sight of the plier with which, they were told, their fingernails were to be pulled out.


The postcard our young revolutionary from St Stephen's had written to his parents was intercepted by the Postal Department censors (yes, they existed and were gifted with the art of steaming open envelopes and inland letters) and it landed on Runu Guha Neogi's desk.


The notorious tormentor of Naxals is said to have burst into uncontrollable laughter at the naivete of our young Stephanian Comrade. Casual inquiry revealed the social and other connections of his parents. The lad was told to get back to college immediately if he valued his hide, which he did.


This story ends with the young Naxal from St Stephen's putting off Revolution for another day, and on completion of his graduate studies, setting sail for America where he was to train in capitalist free market economics. Much later, he was to become a part of the state which he had once sworn to destroy, indistinguishable from the 'class enemy' against whom he had set forth to wage war.


Every revolution, as we know, devours its own -- either literally or metaphorically.


(This apocryphal story was told to me by Arvind Narain, the ever so dazzling intellectual who could bat with both hands.)

🤣
 
It's an old article before modi was PM when he was just gujrat CM he lives upto their expectations

Delhi ‘intellectuals’ fear coming of no-nonsense Modi​

Opinions Author: Tavleen Singh - December 30, 2012
Share Twitter Facebook Google+ Pocket Reddit
Delhi 'intellectuals' fear coming of no-nonsense Modi

73 comments


Narendra Modi was sworn in for his fourth term as Chief Minister of Gujarat last Wednesday to the horror of those Indians who have spent more than a decade portraying him as a demon. These include leftists of varying shades of pink, Muslim intellectuals of varying shades of fundamentalist Islam, social activists of varying causes and political analysts whose intellectual development appears to have stopped when the secularism versus communalism debate died a natural death. What unites this motley crew is a deep fear that if Modi does become Prime Minister in 2014, their dominance of the national discourse, their virtual monopoly on tickets to enter politics, high national awards, Government largesse and other forms of patronage like regular excursions to foreign lands will end. Let me explain in more detail.


The Congress, in its long decades at the helm of India’s destiny has cultivated a particular breed of ‘intellectual’ assiduously. Those who fit into the leftist, liberal, secular category have been given Rajya Sabha tickets, Padma awards and other prizes and have been rewarded with Government jobs and houses in Delhi. The Government of India has enormous powers of patronage and the Congress learned long ago to use them very effectively. So if you are a ‘sarkari’ intellectual, you could find yourself in charge of any one of a myriad cultural and social organisations that come with low salaries but high perks. So if for instance you became head of one of the Government’s literary or music academies you would be entitled to a nice bungalow in Lutyens’ Delhi and a car with a red light on it. If you failed to get one of these jobs you could be rewarded in other ways for your loyalty to the Gandhi family and the Congress ‘ideology’.

So I know many ‘intellectuals’ in Delhi who have been given Government grants for promoting things as diverse as the Urdu language and the environment. If you are well-connected enough, you might even be able to get more than one Government handout without any questions being asked. So you could be a patron of Urdu poetry and the editor of an ecology magazine at the same time.

If you are clever, then you should be able to extend your ‘expertise’ in Urdu or Sanskrit to land yourself a Doordarshan series on the history of these languages or some related subject and you would never need to do what most Indians consider a regular job. In my long years of covering politics and governance in Delhi, I have met retired bureaucrats, failed Bollywood actresses and filmmakers, socialites and relatives of successful politicians who have benefited from Government of India largesse in an extraordinary variety of ways. Nobody has ever questioned this largesse because in the brief moment that the Bharatiya Janata Party came to power in Delhi it continued the practice because the very same ‘intellectuals’ that had lived for years on Government largesse switched political sides effortlessly and switched back to being Congress loyalists when the political fortunes of the BJP declined after 2004.

It may seem hard to believe if you are not from Delhi but trust me when I tell you that the same filmmakers, movie stars, writers, dancers, musicians, artists and other ‘intellectuals’ that thrive on Government of India largesse today were once in the inner circle of Atal Bihari Vajpayee. Even the political analysts that today boast of their closeness to Sonia Gandhi were to be seen in those days waltzing in and out of the Vajpayee household as if their loyalty had always been to him. Why did he allow this? I have asked myself this question often and the only satisfactory answer that I have come up with is that the people who surrounded the BJP Government at the time were new to the foibles and fakery of Lutyens’ Delhi and did not see duplicity and chicanery even when it happened under their noses. By the time they understood what was happening the general election that put the BJP back on the Opposition benches in the Lok Sabha had come and gone.

What worries the ‘intellectuals’ of Lutyens’ Delhi is that Narendra Modi may not be as easy to seduce as Vajpayee was. He may find it easier to discern between cant and real culture and between courtiers and real loyalists and this would inevitably lead to a total overturning of the patronage applecart. So the demonisation of Modi has been a joint project on a scale that has been quite unprecedented in the political history of modern India. It would be fair to say that no Indian politician has been demonised in quite this way and usually because the measure by which he has been judged has not been applied to anyone else.

Whenever I have tried to argue that what Modi allowed to happen in Gujarat in 2002 was modelled on what Rajiv Gandhi allowed to happen with the Sikhs in 1984, I have hit an impenetrable wall. As recently as last month when my new book ‘Durbar’ came out I had a long conversation with a senior bureaucrat who tried to convince me that I was wrong in writing in the book that Rajiv had been complicit in the massacres of the Sikhs. “You must understand that he knew nothing of what was happening,” this gentleman argued, “You must understand that he was a political novice and did not know what was going on or he would never have allowed it.” When I reminded him of the famous ‘big tree falls, earth shakes’ speech, he changed the subject.

This is how it always is whenever Modi’s ‘crimes’ are discussed. The discussion simply ends and if you persist in trying to continue the argument then you get labelled. You get called a ‘Sonia-baiter’ or a ‘saffron supporter’ or that most evil of things in the eyes of the denizens of Lutyens’ Delhi — ‘anti-Muslim’. Well, we do not know what Modi will do if he does become Prime Minister. He may, like Vajpayee, do nothing at all to upset the applecart. But, for the moment his victory has sent such a shiver of fear along the spine of Lutyens’ Delhi that you can almost hear the sound of it rustling like a demonic wind through the corridors of intellectual and cultural power in this city.

 
Tufail Ahmed

People are angry at the murder of Muhammad Akhlaq in Dadri over allegations that he ate beef. Some say they are angry at Akhlaq’s murder, while others say they are angry at the murder of the cow. Some people are angry at the cancellation of Pakistani ghazal singer Ghulam Ali’s show of 9 October in Mumbai due to the Shiv Sena’s threat, while others are angry at Pakistani actors and singers being invited in India.

In the natural world, animals are made of meat and bones. Humans too, made of bones and meat, are animals. What angers them? Let’s look at their habits and ideas.

It is a bogus claim that we as humans are concerned about life, whether the life be of an animal or of a human being. For example, lots of people who argue that they believe in non-violence are non-vegetarians and eat meat in full awareness that an animal has been murdered.

In purely humanist considerations, the life of an animal cannot be less precious than the life of a human being. Among vegetarians, Jains deserve respect as they strive not to hurt even insects. It does not automatically mean that all Jains are vegetarians and pacifists, or that vegetarians do not murder.

Pakistani police killed a boy after he posed for selfie with a toy gun in Faisalabad, but Pakistani people did not protest. But if a Palestinian child is injured in firing by Israeli police, there are global protests by leftists and journalists file numerous outraged reports.

When the U.S. launched the war in Iraq, there were protests across the world by anti-war activists. When Saudi Arabia launched the current air strikes on Yemen, anti-war activists went to sleep. Pakistani army regularly kills people in Balochistan, but Pakistanis do not rise up. In India, secular journalists who claim they are concerned about human rights do not get angry when victims are Hindu.

Secular journalists who are angry at Akhlaq’s killing adopted total silence on a number of murders recently. Last August, army jawan Vedmitra Chaudhury was lynched to death in Hardevnagar, near Meerut, for saving a girl from molesters. In March, a Hindu man was abducted and murdered in Hajipur of Bihar for marrying a Muslim girl. Last June, a man was lynched to death near Eluru in Andhra Pradesh. A mob killed a man in Bhandup West area of Mumbai in June.

Secular journalists’ colour-blindness prevents them from seeing these murders: they do not get angry; they want Muslims to be murdered; only then they speak up. Indian secularism has tasted the Muslim blood.

Indian secularism is not only colour-blind, it is also half-Pakistani.

Secular leader Arvind Kejriwal, the chief minister of Delhi, spoke with Ghulam Ali after his show was cancelled and will host him in Delhi. Secular leader Akhilesh Yadav, the chief minister of Uttar Pradesh, organised Ghulam Ali’s show in Lucknow.


But Kejriwal and Akhilesh didn’t invite our own Oscar-winning musician A. R. Rahman when his music show of 13 September in Delhi was cancelled due to a fatwa by the Barelvi group Raza Academy. Secularism does not like Indian Muslim singers; it does not like Indian writers like Salman Rushdie. Mamata Banerjee, another secular leader, supported Ghulam Ali, saying music has no international boundaries but she will not support Taslima Nasreen, the Bangladeshi writer.

Indian secularism is truly Pakistani, not even a quarter-Bangladeshi.

Indian secularism is also counter-nationalist: secular lawyers turned out at midnight before the Supreme Court to save the life of convicted terrorist Yakub Menon but remain silent on death sentences of common Indians.

Secular journalist Nikhil Wagle wrote: “Without secularism, India is a Hindu Pakistan.“

Indian secularism is not even Indian: it is incomplete without eating beef. It loves to eat beef because Pakistanis eat beef. It is essentially Pakistani. It aligns with Pakistanis.

In 1947, our people thought that they could give away a piece of India’s territory to buy permanent peace. The secular government of Manmohan Singh came close to conceding a part of Kashmir to Pakistan in talks with General Pervez Musharraf, the architect of arguably the largest jihad in modern times in Kargil. Indian secularism is without sex, without consummating with Pakistan.

In his landmark book “On War”, German military strategist Carl von Clausewitz observed: “War is the continuation of politics by other means.” The reason Indians do not want Pakistani singers here is because Pakistan is practically in a state of war against India for nearly seven decades.

Through television and social media, common Indians can understand Pakistan’s war by other means. Pakistan has not formally declared a war, but Indians have grasped the obvious fact of our times that we are in a state of war because Pakistan continues to send jihadists into India. Aamir Khan’s movie Sarfarosh showed us that Pakistan sends arms dealers posing as ghazal singers.

Indian secularism is also Islamist.

In 2012, the secular Congress government did not allow Salman Rushdie to speak in Jaipur because secularism is in an incestuous relationship with Islamists. Mamata Banerjee does not support Taslima Nasreen because the West Bengal CM is in league with Islamists in the state.

Kejriwal’s secularism is in open alliance with Islamists. In 2013, Kejriwal visited Bareilly to meet Islamic cleric Tauqeer Raza Khan to seek Muslim votes. Last year, he sent Alka Lamba to meet Imam Bukhari’s brother to seek Muslim votes. In 1986, Rajiv Gandhi’s secularism surrendered before Islamic clerics in the Shah Bano case. Indian secularism is incomplete without its ideological cohabitation with Islamists.

secular gossip columnist Shobhaa De tweeted: “I just ate beef. Come and murder me.” The question also is: Will she draw a cartoon of Prophet Muhammad at the Gateway of India?

In a tweet dated 4 October, secular journalist Sagarika Ghose wrote: “Citizens of India, we need a campaign like Je Suis Charlie. Hold your head high and say ‘I am a beef eater’.” The question is: Will secular journalists draw the same cartoon in front of Delhi’s Jamaa Masjid?

The outrage is not about beef or cartoon. Indian youths are concerned over secularism’s double standards; they will support your right to eat beef if you are willing to draw a cartoon, even from your kitchen. The secular NDTV, supported by Aircel, began Save Our Tiger campaign. Why not a Save the Cow campaign?

India is a great nation. Its reality is this: Bollywood actor Aamir Khan makes the movie #PK in which Hindu god Lord Shiva is locked up in a bathroom and threatened, but he cannot make a movie on Prophet Muhammad. This is the imbalance in our national conversation that threatens India’s social cohesion. It is fostered by journalists.

India is witnessing the emergence of fascism from newsrooms, a movement of totalitarian ideas that divides us in order to win. Indian journalists are beaten up by Indians in New York or Dadri for their double standards. On social media, they are being called pimps and presstitutes, bimbos and bazaaru media because they sell their souls for a bungalow or a Rajya Sabha seat.

This secular fascism, in league with Islamic totalitarianism, wins by dividing us, but police must deal ruthlessly with any Indian who takes law into their own hands.

(A version of this article was published on October 15 by Dainik Jagran, India’s largest Hindi-language newspaper under the title “Secular Qabeeley Ke Log”)
 
VPN-HSL-468-X60-2x

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top