Israel x Iran Conflict (71 Viewers)

Mashhad Airport. Iranian tanker aircraft burning.1750002778040.webp
 
I think we intercepted 800-1000 drones a few ballistic missiles . The situation might have been different but we also covered a much bigger area.,
More than 3 cities.

Drones ≠ Ballistic Missiles

Drones are easy to neutralize. Ballistic missiles are a totally different ball game. Imagine a saturated BM attack on our heavily populated cities. 100s of BM falling on a small area can saturate any SAM system. It is difficult to defend against any saturation attack, be it drones, rocket, CMs with a missile based defence system. And let's not forget that unlike drones and CMs that travel at sub-sonic speeds which are relatively easy to track and intercept, BMs at terminal phase approach it's target at hypersonic speed.

It took US THAAD, SM-2ER and SM-3 assisting Israeli Arrow 2 and Arrow 3 to shoot down 100+ BMs out of the launched 150 (approx).

Our AD is designed against jets, CMs and drones.
S-400 has limited BMD capability. Our own phase 1 is deployed but even with phase 2, we can't say for sure that we can defend against what Israelis are facing.
 
Drones ≠ Ballistic Missiles

Drones are easy to neutralize. Ballistic missiles are a totally different ball game. Imagine a saturated BM attack on our heavily populated cities. 100s of BM falling on a small area can saturate any SAM system. It is difficult to defend against any saturation attack, be it drones, rocket, CMs with a missile based defence system. And let's not forget that unlike drones and CMs that travel at sub-sonic speeds which are relatively easy to track and intercept, BMs at terminal phase approach it's target at hypersonic speed.

It took US THAAD, SM-2ER and SM-3 assisting Israeli Arrow 2 and Arrow 3 to shoot down 100+ BMs out of the launched 150 (approx).

Our AD is designed against jets, CMs and drones.
S-400 has limited BMD capability. Our own phase 1 is deployed but even with phase 2, we can't say for sure that we can defend against what Israelis are facing.
We need at scale deployment of Kusha, AD-1 and AD-2 to come close to IDF's capacity.
 
Drones ≠ Ballistic Missiles

Drones are easy to neutralize. Ballistic missiles are a totally different ball game. Imagine a saturated BM attack on our heavily populated cities. 100s of BM falling on a small area can saturate any SAM system. It is difficult to defend against any saturation attack, be it drones, rocket, CMs with a missile based defence system. And let's not forget that unlike drones and CMs that travel at sub-sonic speeds which are relatively easy to track and intercept, BMs at terminal phase approach it's target at hypersonic speed.

It took US THAAD, SM-2ER and SM-3 assisting Israeli Arrow 2 and Arrow 3 to shoot down 100+ BMs out of the launched 150 (approx).

Our AD is designed against jets, CMs and drones.
S-400 has limited BMD capability. Our own phase 1 is deployed but even with phase 2, we can't say for sure that we can defend against what Israelis are facing.

Indian Phase 1 and 2 ABMs are deployed already in NCR and Mumbai region…

Can track and destroy around 50 MRBMs at once in both these sectors.

And this was few years ago but depends are we fool enough to let pakis even try that I say fckin preemptively nuke those inbred islamists subhumans doesnt matter the radiations impact on Indian side
 
If the Iranian regime survives this shit show, then their grass eating moment will come. They have Oil resources to back it up, so don't be surprised if they also say "We will eat grass but we will build the bomb" like Porkistanis. If this conflict has thought them anything that they need nukes to take on Israel and for their very survival.

They will pour all resources to build the bomb. There will be no turning back. If Israel is serious they need to give a knock out blow completely eliminating the regime's strategic sites. Otherwise expect what we have seen until now will be just a trailer. I am guessing from Israel's actions they won't let this chance go to waste and go for the kill. Just imagine one of those ballistic missile was armed with a nuke, there won't be any Israel.
 
Drones ≠ Ballistic Missiles

Drones are easy to neutralize. Ballistic missiles are a totally different ball game. Imagine a saturated BM attack on our heavily populated cities. 100s of BM falling on a small area can saturate any SAM system. It is difficult to defend against any saturation attack, be it drones, rocket, CMs with a missile based defence system. And let's not forget that unlike drones and CMs that travel at sub-sonic speeds which are relatively easy to track and intercept, BMs at terminal phase approach it's target at hypersonic speed.

It took US THAAD, SM-2ER and SM-3 assisting Israeli Arrow 2 and Arrow 3 to shoot down 100+ BMs out of the launched 150 (approx).

Our AD is designed against jets, CMs and drones.
S-400 has limited BMD capability. Our own phase 1 is deployed but even with phase 2, we can't say for sure that we can defend against what Israelis are facing.
This THAAD system US gave is the top of the line for USA after this there is nothing better? This has failed In Israel it does not bode well for South Korea and other US Allies like Saudi Arabia .
 
how far off are AD1 and AD2 systems from deployment , ?

Do you really expect someone to have answer of that? We fearlessly attacked Porkis nuke facilities command and control sites and delivery platforms when they have both Ballistic missile and nukes that should be giving you answer because the amount of confidence we have shown in our ADs was a clear giveaway.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top