The challenges Israeli AD faced are nothing compare to Indian AD's.
If you notice Israel have done a lot of censorship over missiles hit on it's cities. But we can safely assume Iranians have 10% hit rate against Israeli ADs(90% interceptions).
In similar situation even if our ADs achieve 80% success they should be considered better then Iron Dom.
Why?
1. Israel is a country only 420+ km long, you place 1 S400 missile battery in center and whole country will be covered.
2. Iran and Israel have 1600+ km distance, which give a lot of time to react against even ballistic missiles.
3. Israel is being supported by a lot of other countries intercepting these missiles.
4. Distance also makes the threat uni directional. Only targets they have to counter are either long range slow Drones or ballistic missiles.
5. Iranian air force is non existent.
Now compare that with the threat we face...
1. Border is 3300+ km long with just pakistan, we also have to guard 7000+ KM cost line and 4000+ chinese border as well.
2. We share border with Pakistan so reaction time is couple of minutes.
3. No support from any other nation.
4. Pakistan does have very good airforce by Iranian standard.
5. Since we do share border pretty much everything is a threat right from Mortar, Artillery shells, FPV/Swarm drones, PGM, loitering munitions, Kamikaze drones, fighter jets, a very wide variety of missiles (Surface to surface, Air to surface, air to air, surface to air, cruise, ballistic) travelling at different altitude and with different speed targeting various places.
Just imagine the challenges our command and control and battle management systems has to handle.
A lot of above mentioned threats were used in 100s on numbers against and we didn't fail, so just because BMs were not in hundreds on numbers doesn't mean our ADs didn't face any challenge, actually it was worse then what Israel is facing.
