Air India AI 171 Crash in Ahmedabad (6 Viewers)

[Anants]

If genuine, some useful info from other aviation forum:

Noshow wrote:
They can release just the data and leave any in depth analysis to their experts for later on. There is a public global interest in knowing what went wrong.

Which is a pretty inane ask. Why Indian investigators should go out of the way to release information they collected to public when they themselves are still investigating and analyzing? Indian are also investigating Sabotage angle.. if there is sabotage angle you are saying without completing criminal investigations - India should release evidences and data collected for the possible offending party to wipe off any possible clues left?

Is it that you agree with this sentiment as you like NoShow cant hide the frustrations that these incompetent brown people should be allowed to do anything independent?

 

[Spitfire IX]

Which is a pretty inane ask. Why Indian investigators should go out of the way to release information they collected to public when they themselves are still investigating and analyzing? Indian are also investigating Sabotage angle.. if there is sabotage angle you are saying without completing criminal investigations - India should release evidences and data collected for the possible offending party to wipe off any possible clues left?

Is it that you agree with this sentiment as you like NoShow cant hide the frustrations that these incompetent brown people should be allowed to do anything independent?

No. I referred to what the investigator/analyst wrote as useful info. Do you find it so? Does it matter if he/she is Indian, Peruvian, Chinese, English, black, brown, white, purple or whatever? It looks like an expert view to me.

 

[Anants]

No. I referred to what the investigator/analyst wrote as useful info. Do you find it so? Does it matter if he/she is Indian, Peruvian, Chinese, English, black, brown, white, purple or whatever? It looks like an expert view to me.

An expert who is talking through his hat. That is a stupid statement you quoted of noshow which hardly shows his expertise.

 

[Spitfire IX]

An expert who is talking through his hat. That is a stupid statement you quoted of noshow which hardly shows his expertise.

Sorry, checking out of this conversation. Tried to make a useful contribution. It seems you could not see that.

 

[Anants]

Sorry, checking out of this conversation. Tried to make a useful contribution. It seems you could not see that.

What useful you wrote you got my "reaction" what Quoted inane part deservedly got my disdain. Thank you for bowing out.

 

[Bhartiya Sainik]

These veteran defence journalists talking about fuel switches pointed to the engine fire handles on international level news.

These people are part of top big media houses, with good salary.
The media houses gave big fee for their ride in jet fighters.
Still they can't do simple google & YT search also. In schools there is Internet search competition.
This is the quality of reporting we have.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0eHzRg98T4