Bangladesh Civil War & Coup 2024

Hope our own Chandra mukhi and his collegium Sakhis from the Supreme Court are watching... These regime change operators won't spare them as well, if they succeed in India

 
bunch of thieves pretending to be a nation, always guilt ridden and looking over their shoulder that someday someone else will do to them what they did to the original natives of that land, to cope with the historical guilt indulging every kind of debauchery in other areas of society.

mad respect indeed.
I see no harm in it.

After nuking Japan, should they allow Japan to be left alone and develop the nukes for themselves?
Mind you, It is the Japanese the Americans fear the most.

The same is their case with Blacks. They used them as slaves. And when they set them free they made sure they did not have to keep looking behind their shoulders all the time.

They are violent people and know-how violence is utilized to grow and be safe. This is a different paradigm that Indians have no training or understanding.

Just look at India's moral lead-by-example nudging has brought to us. Every day our sons are getting killed at the borders. And to what objective? Just being sitting ducks? Of course, American soldiers also get killed but the context must not be ignored.

We let Pakistan become a nuclear state. We are allowing them to dispute our territories. We allowed Muslims to stay back. The reservation we gave to SC/BC Hindu communities became a thankless liability and a dose of daily insults. The current situation is so tinder-box-like that it can start civil unrest any day.

It is quite clear that we haven't yet understood the power dynamics like how to wield or share it while protecting our interests.

Today we have two nuclear states pointing hundreds of rocket batteries at us. Many of these rockets are nuclear-tipped. Now we have got two Pakistans flanking both sides. Pakistan became a nuclear weapon state uncontested. What kind of 5D chess our policymakers were playing at that time?

The answer is they, did not know what a provocation is.

You can only sense provocation if you are a violent person who has used violence before, without any guilt.
 
open this discussion in some other thread, there will be diverse views on this.

why did their "founders" think they need guns in the first place?

their early settlers were claiming vast lands as personal property as far as eye could see and planting flags to mark their ownership, and registering them. small pox infested blankets as gifts and massacres of natives. obviously they will need to protect themselves from their own and revenge attacks from the natives. their 2nd amendment is a manifestation of deeds done by their early settlers.

Native Americans were not a monolithic group, many of them were tribal warlords simply incapable of putting up a united front. They would've lost whether or not the European colonists had guns because they were simply incapable of putting their tribal animosities aside.

The reasons for 2nd amendment's existence is fairly complicated. Some historians say it is rooted in the violent independence revolution against the British crown and the lack of a strong standing army at that time meant that the leaders had no choice but to raise citizen militias. In any case the reason for its existence is complicated and not straightforward as in to just take the natives out.

by the way, those buggers were looking for a way to land on our shores. if destiny was written in a different manner, we could have been at the receiving end of small pox infested blankets and massacres, not that the buggers who did land did not try other methods.
That's true but Indian kings and empires at that time would've resisted much better to such methods. We were already somewhat resistant to small pox and many other diseases at that time and far more advanced than native Americans in terms of military tactics and weaponry.

My original comment needs to be taken in context of self defence only, not in defence of what the european colonists did.
 
What happened is that a majority of Hindus themselves will attack the trads as casteists and bigots.
Tell me honestly, what % of Hindus will support trads if trads say that the varna system should be followed?

10% at best?

Trads don't see a reason to defend the faith.
10 percent is probably the population of upper castes in India.. In the south upper castes are less than 5 percent.. They have less children than OBC, SC, STs.. Everyone follows caste practises. But, if it is seen as humiliating or hindering social / religious participation of OBCs, SCs/STs.. in a democracy like India where FC numbers are falling, there will be political blowback further reducing their power..
 
I see no harm in it.

After nuking Japan, should they allow Japan to be left alone and develop the nukes for themselves?
Mind you, It is the Japanese the Americans fear the most.

The same is their case with Blacks. They used them as slaves. And when they set them free they made sure they did not have to keep looking behind their shoulders all the time.

They are violent people and know-how violence is utilized to grow and be safe. This is a different paradigm that Indians have no training or understanding.


You can only sense provocation if you are a violent person who has used violence before, without any guilt.

Sir, do you think a part of this is doctrinal? Dharmic religions have all these concepts like Ahimsa, Dharma, Karma etc. Morality and righteousness is very deeply baked into Hinduism and that limits us from being that violent. Buddhism and Jainism are even more extreme in this aspect.

Or is it due to the long periods of colonialism we suffered from, or is it Gandhian ideology or some other reason? I sometimes wonder.
 
You can only sense provocation if you are a violent person who has used violence before, without any guilt.
I will just add that, you don't have to be violent at all....you just need instinct, some courage and some utmost respect for your sacred lines. Getting into a fight when its unavoidable is to let go of consequences just like Sri Krishna ji taught via Gita, just somethign you must do and not avoid. I have been in unavoidable fights and got my ass kicked sometimes but retreat is something some people can't do.

India's actions are 100% anti-Gita and therefore all consequences are guaranteed.
 
I will just add that, you don't have to be violent at all....you just need instinct, some courage and some utmost respect for your sacred lines. Getting into a fight when its unavoidable is to let go of consequences just like Sri Krishna ji taught via Gita, just somethign you must do and not avoid. I have been in unavoidable fights and got my ass kicked sometimes but retreat is something some people can't do.

India's actions are 100% anti-Gita and therefore all consequences are guaranteed.
You are all over brother. But your post proved my point that most Indians do not have an understanding of this paradigm.
 
Last edited:
If kangladesh had population under 5 crore we should have invaded without thinking twice, i still don't understand how were they able to fit 20 crore in that tiny piece of land.
 
I see no harm in it.

After nuking Japan, should they allow Japan to be left alone and develop the nukes for themselves?
Mind you, It is the Japanese the Americans fear the most.

The same is their case with Blacks. They used them as slaves. And when they set them free they made sure they did not have to keep looking behind their shoulders all the time.

They are violent people and know-how violence is utilized to grow and be safe. This is a different paradigm that Indians have no training or understanding.

Just look at India's moral lead-by-example nudging has brought to us. Every day our sons are getting killed at the borders. And to what objective? Just being sitting ducks? Of course, American soldiers also get killed but the context must not be ignored.

We let Pakistan become a nuclear state. We are allowing them to dispute our territories. We allowed Muslims to stay back. The reservation we gave to SC/BC Hindu communities became a thankless liability and a dose of daily insults. The current situation is so tinder-box-like that it can start civil unrest any day.

It is quite clear that we haven't yet understood the power dynamics like how to wield or share it while protecting our interests.

Today we have two nuclear states pointing hundreds of rocket batteries at us. Many of these rockets are nuclear-tipped. Now we have got two Pakistans flanking both sides. Pakistan became a nuclear weapon state uncontested. What kind of 5D chess our policymakers were playing at that time?

The answer is they, did not know what a provocation is.

You can only sense provocation if you are a violent person who has used violence before, without any guilt.
What about the reservation u gave to baniyas of whole business, Brahmins whole of religion, and serial losers "greatest warriors" in stories huge tracts of land.
Last I checked over 75% of wealth is reserved by few divine "upper" caste.

And what's the % of govt jobs in total jobs ,so that reservation boogy man used by original divine reservation walas can be put in perspective, I am sure it won't be more than 4% and in that too jugad and connections of upper castes gets a lot of non important places filled.

Also reservation on paper vs actually when it started to be used has about 50 yrs gap. Just 15-20 yrs ago the seats went empty , because in village schools the original reservationist won't stop the bullying to the point one has to quit or get mobbed if retaliate.
There are guys who fail in study still end up being millionaire because khandani reservation of dukan or mandir or pushtani zameen going on and on.

Why don't u agitate against this bs spouting dhandebaaz babas sitting with make up making cucks of the common man.
So, u got almost monopoly reservation on business, on religion, on land resources, infact other resources too and in politics, i.e. Economy , politics and religion,
And rest others should do labour jobs.
Makes one wonder why so much hoopla was about British raj or even Mughals ,why you have to go for agitations and war against them , could have just played second fiddle labourers to them just like the boogyman SC/ST's.

Ps: Your major reservation is taken by obc's funny thing is rich/dominant landowning castes come under it and it's all politically motivated not socio-economic wise, but u will never dare to target them as they will mob u but sure SC/ST are easy target.

Also For the overly used cliche statement that u know one SC/st guy who is richer than the "bechara" "upper" caste guy I know 20 good for nothing general waste of life's who live lavishly due to khandani Wealth reservation.
 

Surprisingly SHW home wasn't a palace as you would expect PMs would have normally. Just normal interiors and furnishings like we have in our home.
She wasn't that bad as Chungideshis make her out to be.
In comparison, the jarnails whose houses were raided by youthiyas in Porkistan had much better, and much more expensive interiors than those in Sheikh Hasina's place.
 
You are all over brother. But your post proved my point that most Indians do not have an understanding of this paradigm.
I know, my english is as bad as my frustration. Wish this was a hindi forum.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Donate via Bitcoin - bc1qpc3h2l430vlfflc8w02t7qlkvltagt2y4k9dc2

qrcode
Back
Top