Chess: Global Updates

The whole west is fuming now since there is a New Indian WC. Hardly anyone in west can digest Indian outperforming them:


View: https://x.com/TheKhelIndia/status/1867269369073463380

Not just Indian, also youngest ever. Dethroned the great Gary Kasparov - not even Carlsen was younger when he became World Champion. 18th world champion and youngest at 18 has a great ring to it.

Gukesh has had a monster year - it hasnt been reflected as much in the ELO, but in victories, it has been jaw dropping. he did blow away the candidates tournament, which in and of itself is a crazy good feat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKC
Congratulations to Gukesh Dommaraju for this historic Win!

meanwhile, there are people already doubting this win as some sort of 'match fixing'


China's Ding Liren lost to Gukesh on purpose, alleges Russian Chess Federation chief

Sports DC Web Desk 13 December 2024 11:15 AM
1734087166176.webp
India's D Gukesh and China’s Ding Liren during the 14th game of the FIDE World Chess Championship 2024, in Singapore, Thursday, Dec. 12, 2024. (FIDE/Eng Chin An via PTI Photo)

As the Chess community, not just in India but across the world is celebrating its youngest World Champion -- 19-year-old D Gukesh, a disturbing accusation from Russian Chess Federation chief Filatov has emerged.

Filatov, according to Russian media, had accused the defending champion Ding Liren (China) of losing the all important final game on purpose.

A blunder by the Chinese player in the 14th game that cost him the world title, also kept him at the receiving end of the serious allegations.

"Losing the position in which Ding Liren was is difficult even for a first-class player. The defeat of the Chinese player in today's game raises a lot of questions and looks like a deliberate one," the Russian Chess Federation chief said as quoted by local news agency TASS.

Filatov even went on to seeking a detailed investigation into the match by FIDE.

"The result of the last game caused bewilderment among professionals and chess fans. The actions of the Chinese chess player in the decisive segment are extremely suspicious and require a separate investigation by FIDE," he added.

Interestingly, Gukesh, 19, surpassed Russia's legendary Garry Kasparov as the youngest world chess champion. Kasparov achieved the feat when he won the title at the age of 22.

On Thursday, Gukesh secured the requisite 7.5 points as against 6.5 of Liren after winning the last classical time control game of the 14-game match that seemed headed for a draw for most part. ( Source : Deccan Chronicle )

https://www.deccanchronicle.com/spo...lleges-russian-chess-federation-chief-1846431

click on this link to not give any viewship to article -
https://archive.vn/rHD4x
 
Why everyone in world is acting like retard?
View attachment 18455
Kek magnus for however over achieving he is isn't devoid of insecurity. Good for him gukesh and prag at their age can probably give him a tough competition and he knows it would only get more difficulty as they rake experience. What's the best option? Retire while still being undefeated.
 
He is done with the classical world championship. Has said as much before.
Didn't he participate in the current world championship ? If not why not ? And since when has he stopped participating in it ?
 
Didn't he participate in the current world championship ? If not why not ? And since when has he stopped participating in it ?
The classical chess world championships are structured like the title matches of professional boxers; only 2 contenders take part in it - the title holder (in this case, Ding) and his challenger (Gukesh). A contender has to win the Candidates to earn the right to challenge the reigning champion. So yeah, Magnus wasn't even in the picture.

Why?

Because he won 5 back to back titles between 2013 and 2021 (he beat Vishy in 2013 and 2014 btw). Following which he went on to relinquish his title voluntarily because he got 'bored' and 'sick' of it. He has been focusing on his FIDE ratings since.
 
People are underestimating Magnus particularly the new Chess fans from India on Twitter who started following Chess since last 2 weeks.

I'm no gora bootlicker but no player has a chance to beat Magnus in a 1 on 1 match that spans 14 games.

Chess has 3 formats - Classical, Rapid and Blitz. In Cricketing terms they are equivalent of Test, ODI and T20.

The World Chess Championship is held in Classical format only. Classical matches extend for 4+ hours each while Rapid matches extend for about 1 hour and Blitz matches end in 10 mins.

Magnus is no longer interested in grinding out 4+ hour matches. He's 34 and is close to retiring and he has won everything that's to win in Chess. So, he voluntarily gave up his WCC title. He 90% of the time only plays Rapid and Blitz formats these days.

Here's a synopsis of Gukesh and Magnus in all three formats.

Classical - Magnus is no 1 and Gukesh is no 5.

Rapid - Magnus is no 1 and Gukesh is top 25 at best.

Blitz - Magnus is no 1 and Gukesh is top 50 at best.

Gukesh routinely tops classical tournaments he plays in and routinely ends at the bottom in Rapid and Blitz tournaments he plays in.

Magnus would steamroll Gukesh in Rapid and Blitz and he'll still beat Gukesh by a decent margin in Classical.
 
People are underestimating Magnus particularly the new Chess fans from India on Twitter who started following Chess since last 2 weeks.

I'm no gora bootlicker but no player has a chance to beat Magnus in a 1 on 1 match that spans 14 games.

Chess has 3 formats - Classical, Rapid and Blitz. In Cricketing terms they are equivalent of Test, ODI and T20.

The World Chess Championship is held in Classical format only. Classical matches extend for 4+ hours each while Rapid matches extend for about 1 hour and Blitz matches end in 10 mins.

Magnus is no longer interested in grinding out 4+ hour matches. He's 34 and is close to retiring and he has won everything that's to win in Chess. So, he voluntarily gave up his WCC title. He 90% of the time only plays Rapid and Blitz formats these days.

Here's a synopsis of Gukesh and Magnus in all three formats.

Classical - Magnus is no 1 and Gukesh is no 5.

Rapid - Magnus is no 1 and Gukesh is top 25 at best.

Blitz - Magnus is no 1 and Gukesh is top 50 at best.

Gukesh routinely tops classical tournaments he plays in and routinely ends at the bottom in Rapid and Blitz tournaments he plays in.

Magnus would steamroll Gukesh in Rapid and Blitz and he'll still beat Gukesh by a decent margin in Classical.
yes, magnus got bored, but that in itself is a knock on magnus for me - burnout is a factor like it was for Bobby Fischer.
But reality is,magnus, like Kasparov, has a distinct edge over everyone in one sector of the game. In Kasparov's case, it was openings ( he is widely considered the best opener in the game, ever, even now) and in the case of magnus, its the end game. Magnus almost never ever fucks up an end-game and can easily see the draw angles as black and basically makes it extremely difficult to win as white every single time against him, without fail. But magnus, like all, is also only human and he too has blundered like Ding did - most famously in a tourney against Pragu.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKC
yes, magnus got bored, but that in itself is a knock on magnus for me - burnout is a factor like it was for Bobby Fischer.
But reality is,magnus, like Kasparov, has a distinct edge over everyone in one sector of the game. In Kasparov's case, it was openings ( he is widely considered the best opener in the game, ever, even now) and in the case of magnus, its the end game. Magnus almost never ever fucks up an end-game and can easily see the draw angles as black and basically makes it extremely difficult to win as white every single time against him, without fail. But magnus, like all, is also only human and he too has blundered like Ding did - most famously in a tourney against Pragu.
Which is why, I said over the span of 14 games. Yes, he can lose an odd game here and there.

Magnus is the greatest end game player of all time. He can grind out a dead draw position into a win by eeking small advantages over dozens of moves.

Supporting Gukesh is good but I'm seeing some serious delusions on Twitter from certain idiots like below


View: https://x.com/GabbbarSingh/status/1865762101429690555
 
Which is why, I said over the span of 14 games. Yes, he can lose an odd game here and there.

Magnus is the greatest end game player of all time. He can grind out a dead draw position into a win by eeking small advantages over dozens of moves.

Supporting Gukesh is good but I'm seeing some serious delusions on Twitter from certain idiots like below


View: https://x.com/GabbbarSingh/status/1865762101429690555

it is for now, but Magnus is not undefeatable in the long run by someone like Gukesh, at least in the classical format. In fact, magnus has come out and said what i believe is actually true of Gukesh - he is the best calculator in the game - he calculates angles and lines live in game better than anyone and that is why he is such a strong classical player in such a short period of time. However, he is a bit of an odd-ball in chess, in terms of being a lot less consistent in the shorter versions of the game, mostly attributed to lacking 'elite instincts' in chess. Which is fine.
Ultimately, rapids & blitz are like the T20s of Chess and it doesnt interest the main body of recreational players ( even at master levels for eg) - the faster versions of chess relies on solid technique, rote memory and such to even get started, because the game is just too fast for anyone to calculate even 4 deep for every move.
In classical chess, one has the luxury of learning an attacking line partway - like say Queen's gambit accepted, up to 7-8 deep and then just wing it and figure it out with the advantages gained and grind out a win by out-thinking your opponent.

So i will say that Gukesh is probably actually one of the likelier guys to go on and take down Magnus in the near future in the classical version - though not sure if he will attain such a huge ELO rating like magnus because tht would require being undefeated for like a 7-8 year period.

Chess is getting more and more competitive in the middle ranks, with far more 2600+ players than ever before, affecting ELO ranks to get to the upper levels etc. and 2800+ guy can lose to a 2600+ guy on his bad days quite easily, with the sheer ranks being filled with them making long undefeated runs more and more unlikely.

We shall see, Gukesh is afterall only 18, which is still child prodigy level more than an established master, this can go a lot of ways in the future. The world is currently Gukesh's oyester and let him just soak it in for a bit.


Overall, i would say that Gukesh's reign as world champ depends a lot on the format, if FIDE continues the moronic format of 'lets decide classical champion by non classical format after 14 classical games', then Gukesh will always be under pressure to deliver in the classical format itself and lead to matches like this and maybe he even gets crushed by Magnus if Magnus ever changes his mind and plays.

But if FIDE wakes up and reverts the format out of the rapids tie break format, Gukesh actually has a good shot at a long reign, because his mental prep is very suited to the long format.
You could see it in his meticulousness in the winning moments - he instantly realized that he is winning and will be world champ, then composed his excitement and forced himself to STILL work out all the angles and do his homework before closing out the game.
Either way, the man will be a beast if he doesn't get burntout in the long format.
 
it is for now, but Magnus is not undefeatable in the long run by someone like Gukesh, at least in the classical format. In fact, magnus has come out and said what i believe is actually true of Gukesh - he is the best calculator in the game - he calculates angles and lines live in game better than anyone and that is why he is such a strong classical player in such a short period of time. However, he is a bit of an odd-ball in chess, in terms of being a lot less consistent in the shorter versions of the game, mostly attributed to lacking 'elite instincts' in chess. Which is fine.
Ultimately, rapids & blitz are like the T20s of Chess and it doesnt interest the main body of recreational players ( even at master levels for eg) - the faster versions of chess relies on solid technique, rote memory and such to even get started, because the game is just too fast for anyone to calculate even 4 deep for every move.
In classical chess, one has the luxury of learning an attacking line partway - like say Queen's gambit accepted, up to 7-8 deep and then just wing it and figure it out with the advantages gained and grind out a win by out-thinking your opponent.

So i will say that Gukesh is probably actually one of the likelier guys to go on and take down Magnus in the near future in the classical version - though not sure if he will attain such a huge ELO rating like magnus because tht would require being undefeated for like a 7-8 year period.

Chess is getting more and more competitive in the middle ranks, with far more 2600+ players than ever before, affecting ELO ranks to get to the upper levels etc. and 2800+ guy can lose to a 2600+ guy on his bad days quite easily, with the sheer ranks being filled with them making long undefeated runs more and more unlikely.

We shall see, Gukesh is afterall only 18, which is still child prodigy level more than an established master, this can go a lot of ways in the future. The world is currently Gukesh's oyester and let him just soak it in for a bit.


Overall, i would say that Gukesh's reign as world champ depends a lot on the format, if FIDE continues the moronic format of 'lets decide classical champion by non classical format after 14 classical games', then Gukesh will always be under pressure to deliver in the classical format itself and lead to matches like this and maybe he even gets crushed by Magnus if Magnus ever changes his mind and plays.

But if FIDE wakes up and reverts the format out of the rapids tie break format, Gukesh actually has a good shot at a long reign, because his mental prep is very suited to the long format.
You could see it in his meticulousness in the winning moments - he instantly realized that he is winning and will be world champ, then composed his excitement and forced himself to STILL work out all the angles and do his homework before closing out the game.
Either way, the man will be a beast if he doesn't get burntout in the long format.
Agreed on everything.

 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

VPN-HSL-250-X250
Back
Top