Chinese Economy Watch

You assume that China wants to rule the world,

Since no one country can rule the world,

So you talk about a topic that doesn't exist,
you can not understand it because you support the CCP propaganda willingly or not, perhaps you are too naive to grasp it or simply you have not read history and economy.

The nation state is dead, the american dis-industrialization, the forced acceptance of a multicultural Europe and USA, the tech transfers to China is social engineering to make a weaker west accept a common market, common currency and a common supranational government and army.

From your CCP controlled Propaganda you think it is because China is on the rise, the reality it is also social engineering, like communism was to destroy the wealth of the Russian Czar, or the french revolution to allow usury and destroy the power of the church.


China is not on the rise, the puppeteers prepare China to weaken further the west but specially Russia, but China will be also destroyed, and you can see it in the Tariffs also set on China.

Dream of Empire, dream the thought controlled, bureaucratic China created all the tech transfers you got and that these can be gotten in a dictatorship where corruption is rampant, repression is the order of the day, dream dream, remember the Russian Czar has a new name, he is called Putin.

In WWI many empires fell, so after WWII, same in the French revolution.

The puppeteers are just doing social engineering.
 
Last edited:

1732057416499.webp
1732057590729.webp

Clinton did not know tech transfers would damage the US economy?

Sending jobs would not harm the USA worker?


1732057490145.webp

John Goodenough thought uhmmm I worked so hard for the Chinese to get my invention​


1732058025118.webp

Fools do not understand History and the deeper reasons behind HIstory.

Did have the soviet Union the MFN trade status?

Has Cuba MFN trade status?

What about North Korea? Nicaragua?

1732057740966.webp

Why Nixon did go?


1732057809777.webp

however fools have no understanding


Rulers, politicians, administrators, businessmen and even common men used manipulation and maneuvering to accomplish their tasks efficiently, effectively and uniterruptly. These strategies and manipulations were termed as 'Social Engineering'. 'Social Engineering' is a multidimensional and interdisciplinary phenomenon across the subject areas like political science, sociology, law and computer science & information technology. Lately, the concept of 'Social Engineering' has become synonymous in day to day politics. Social Engineering as the name indicates attempts to engineering and construction of society. All the practitioners of social engineering are generally known as 'Social Engineers'. In political science, Social engineering emphasize on the creation of an egalitarian, homogeneous and equalitarian society irrespective to any partial treatment on the basis of caste, class, community, gender, language, culture and region. Presently, almost all the political parties are using their respective 'Social engineering's' to bolster and strengthen their prospect in electoral arena. That is why, today 'social engineering' become a much hyped activity and phenomenon in Indian parlance in peculiar.

 
Last edited:
View attachment 15840
View attachment 15843

Clinton did not know tech transfers would damage the US economy?

Sending jobs would not harm the USA worker?


View attachment 15841

John Goodenough thought uhmmm I worked so hard for the Chinese to get my invention​


View attachment 15846

Fools do not understand History and the deeper reasons behind HIstory.

Did have the soviet Union the MFN trade status?

Has Cuba MFN trade status?

What about North Korea? Nicaragua?

View attachment 15844

Why Nixon did go?


View attachment 15845

however fools have no understanding


Rulers, politicians, administrators, businessmen and even common men used manipulation and maneuvering to accomplish their tasks efficiently, effectively and uniterruptly. These strategies and manipulations were termed as 'Social Engineering'. 'Social Engineering' is a multidimensional and interdisciplinary phenomenon across the subject areas like political science, sociology, law and computer science & information technology. Lately, the concept of 'Social Engineering' has become synonymous in day to day politics. Social Engineering as the name indicates attempts to engineering and construction of society. All the practitioners of social engineering are generally known as 'Social Engineers'. In political science, Social engineering emphasize on the creation of an egalitarian, homogeneous and equalitarian society irrespective to any partial treatment on the basis of caste, class, community, gender, language, culture and region. Presently, almost all the political parties are using their respective 'Social engineering's' to bolster and strengthen their prospect in electoral arena. That is why, today 'social engineering' become a much hyped activity and phenomenon in Indian parlance in peculiar.


Cheers to the friendship between China and the United States


1732067270529.webp


Be a nice guy with Chou Enlai

1732067600426.webp
 
Time has changed.

Term "Market for Tech transfer" was for China, but now...

View attachment 15870

minimum tech transfers, mostly to force joint production and get money by each Chinese car sold in Europe why? simply Europe has EVs and batteries were not invented in China there are Lithium battery production in many countries.
 
Even before President-elect Donald Trump and his tariff-heavy agenda won the White House, top companies were already planning to shift production out of China at a faster pace, according to a new study.

Based on a survey of 166 CEOs and COOs, Bain & Company found that the share of companies moving operations out of China jumped to 69% in 2024 from 55% in 2022.

Where will they go? The top destination was the Indian subcontinent, with 39% of execs saying they were headed there. That was followed by 16% moving to the U.S. or Canada, 11% to Southeast Asia, 10% to Western Europe, and 8% to Latin America, rounding out the top five destinations.


Meanwhile, more companies are "reshoring" operations to their home countries or "near-shoring" to neighboring countries.

 
minimum tech transfers,

Not minimum but maximum.

In exchange for access to the European market, the vehicle manufacturer is making its technology available to the French-American-Italian group.



EU plans forced technology transfer from Chinese companies in return for subsidies




View: https://x.com/Jas0nYu/status/1857164715790651618?t=mkwaF_sbZFVSqKcgeQw_QQ&s=19



Robin Zeng, CEO of CATL, the world's largest battery manufacturer, criticized Europe's battery industry in a recent interview. He attributed its shortcomings to "incorrect designs, flawed processes, and inadequate equipment," pointing to key areas where he believes European companies are lagging in the global competition for battery production.




simply Europe has EVs and batteries were not invented in China there are Lithium battery production in many countries.

U have no idea in this rapid developing industry.


View: https://x.com/bentleyballan/status/1772920554460226041?t=nBosElqpQFxwLzOBXquXwg&s=19
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not minimum but maximum.

That's why u r jobless for long time and didn't involved into any serious morden industry.


In exchange for access to the European market, the vehicle manufacturer is making its technology available to the French-American-Italian group.



EU plans forced technology transfer from Chinese companies in return for subsidies




View: https://x.com/Jas0nYu/status/1857164715790651618?t=mkwaF_sbZFVSqKcgeQw_QQ&s=19



Robin Zeng, CEO of CATL, the world's largest battery manufacturer, criticized Europe's battery industry in a recent interview. He attributed its shortcomings to "incorrect designs, flawed processes, and inadequate equipment," pointing to key areas where he believes European companies are lagging in the global competition for battery production.






U have no idea in this rapid developing industry.


View: https://x.com/bentleyballan/status/1772920554460226041?t=nBosElqpQFxwLzOBXquXwg&s=19

I think I remarked on this phenomenon a few months ago & voila - here we are ! If EU gets the battery chemistry & other EV related technologies from you why would they need you ? Alternative Rare Earth Material reserves are being explored with means of refining them even as we speak.

Alternative mfg centres along with the entire ecosystem as such will also be developed . It'd take time but I don't think the transition should take more than 5-6 years give or take a year or two at the most. When these alternative centres of mfg come into existence outside of the EU set up by EU EV OEMs , what's China going to do then ?
 
I think I remarked on this phenomenon a few months ago & voila - here we are ! If EU gets the battery chemistry & other EV related technologies from you why would they need you ? Alternative Rare Earth Material reserves are being explored with means of refining them even as we speak.

Alternative mfg centres along with the entire ecosystem as such will also be developed . It'd take time but I don't think the transition should take more than 5-6 years give or take a year or two at the most. When these alternative centres of mfg come into existence outside of the EU set up by EU EV OEMs , what's China going to do then ?

the problem is, the current EU can't do anything right by their own in bbattery industry.

De-industrilization also killed EU.


View: https://x.com/ecommerceshares/status/1858829356807737464?t=Z8tWX4j21ylFyBm1htbMCQ&s=19


View: https://x.com/SteveSaretsky/status/1859000102607876368?t=Bj1erp4OoLfW3YDjXDmNRQ&s=19

Robin Zeng, CEO of CATL, the world's largest battery manufacturer, criticized Europe's battery industry in a recent interview. He attributed its shortcomings to "incorrect designs, flawed processes, and inadequate equipment," pointing to key areas where he believes European companies are lagging in the global competition for battery production.

 
I think I remarked on this phenomenon a few months ago & voila - here we are ! If EU gets the battery chemistry & other EV related technologies from you why would they need you ? Alternative Rare Earth Material reserves are being explored with means of refining them even as we speak.

Alternative mfg centres along with the entire ecosystem as such will also be developed . It'd take time but I don't think the transition should take more than 5-6 years give or take a year or two at the most. When these alternative centres of mfg come into existence outside of the EU set up by EU EV OEMs , what's China going to do then ?

the problem is, the current EU can't do anything right by their own in bbattery industry.

De-industrilization also killed EU.


View: https://x.com/ecommerceshares/status/1858829356807737464?t=Z8tWX4j21ylFyBm1htbMCQ&s=19


View: https://x.com/SteveSaretsky/status/1859000102607876368?t=Bj1erp4OoLfW3YDjXDmNRQ&s=19

Robin Zeng, CEO of CATL, the world's largest battery manufacturer, criticized Europe's battery industry in a recent interview. He attributed its shortcomings to "incorrect designs, flawed processes, and inadequate equipment," pointing to key areas where he believes European companies are lagging in the global competition for battery production.

Northvolt is currently Europe's biggest hope for power batteries. However, the company recently had to scale back its gigafactory plans in Skellefteå, Sweden, after BMW pulled a large order. Against this backdrop, Tangen’s question on why "Europe struggles with production scaling" is especially timely. Not just Northvolt but also European automakers like Volkswagen have recently had to revise their battery factory plans.


 
Last edited:
the problem is, the current EU can't do anything right by their own in bbattery industry.

De-industrilization also killed EU.


View: https://x.com/ecommerceshares/status/1858829356807737464?t=Z8tWX4j21ylFyBm1htbMCQ&s=19


View: https://x.com/SteveSaretsky/status/1859000102607876368?t=Bj1erp4OoLfW3YDjXDmNRQ&s=19

Robin Zeng, CEO of CATL, the world's largest battery manufacturer, criticized Europe's battery industry in a recent interview. He attributed its shortcomings to "incorrect designs, flawed processes, and inadequate equipment," pointing to key areas where he believes European companies are lagging in the global competition for battery production.

Northvolt is currently Europe's biggest hope for power batteries. However, the company recently had to scale back its gigafactory plans in Skellefteå, Sweden, after BMW pulled a large order. Against this backdrop, Tangen’s question on why "Europe struggles with production scaling" is especially timely. Not just Northvolt but also European automakers like Volkswagen have recently had to revise their battery factory plans.



Whoever said anything about the EU doing anything within their territory. Battery refining is a notoriously polluting industry. EU environmental norms won't allow for that . They'd use the tech to establish plants in third countries.
 
Not minimum but maximum.

In exchange for access to the European market, the vehicle manufacturer is making its technology available to the French-American-Italian group.



EU plans forced technology transfer from Chinese companies in return for subsidies




View: https://x.com/Jas0nYu/status/1857164715790651618?t=mkwaF_sbZFVSqKcgeQw_QQ&s=19



Robin Zeng, CEO of CATL, the world's largest battery manufacturer, criticized Europe's battery industry in a recent interview. He attributed its shortcomings to "incorrect designs, flawed processes, and inadequate equipment," pointing to key areas where he believes European companies are lagging in the global competition for battery production.






U have no idea in this rapid developing industry.


View: https://x.com/bentleyballan/status/1772920554460226041?t=nBosElqpQFxwLzOBXquXwg&s=19



The EU-funded SAFELiMOVE has developed a Li-ion battery that will improve the performance of EVs and open the door to increased European production of these batteries.According to project coordinator Maria Martínez: “SAFELiMOVE has delivered innovation in five main technology areas: development of nickel-rich layered oxide cathode materials; high specific capacity Li-metal anode materials; innovative hybrid ceramic-polymer electrolyte; deployment of optimisation techniques and study of different interfaces for effective Li transport; and know-how creation for the development of scale-up production of solid-state batteries.”

One of the most promising innovations is the development of solid-state batteries. Unlike traditional lithium-ion batteries that use liquid electrolytes, solid-state batteries use solid electrolytes, which significantly enhance safety and energy density. Companies like Solid Power and QuantumScape are leading the charge, with plans to commercialize solid-state batteries within the next few years. These batteries promise longer life cycles, faster charging times, and improved safety features, making them ideal for both EVs and portable electronics.


A European consortium of eighteen partners from the automotive industry, research, and technology specialists, has developed a complete cobalt-free lithium-ion battery system for electric vehicles. This system integrates a series of innovations in safety, control, and efficiency, intended for the next generation of batteries.

 
The EU-funded SAFELiMOVE has developed a Li-ion battery that will improve the performance of EVs and open the door to increased European production of these batteries.According to project coordinator Maria Martínez: “SAFELiMOVE has delivered innovation in five main technology areas: development of nickel-rich layered oxide cathode materials; high specific capacity Li-metal anode materials; innovative hybrid ceramic-polymer electrolyte; deployment of optimisation techniques and study of different interfaces for effective Li transport; and know-how creation for the development of scale-up production of solid-state batteries.”

One of the most promising innovations is the development of solid-state batteries. Unlike traditional lithium-ion batteries that use liquid electrolytes, solid-state batteries use solid electrolytes, which significantly enhance safety and energy density. Companies like Solid Power and QuantumScape are leading the charge, with plans to commercialize solid-state batteries within the next few years. These batteries promise longer life cycles, faster charging times, and improved safety features, making them ideal for both EVs and portable electronics.


A European consortium of eighteen partners from the automotive industry, research, and technology specialists, has developed a complete cobalt-free lithium-ion battery system for electric vehicles. This system integrates a series of innovations in safety, control, and efficiency, intended for the next generation of batteries.


?

1000073679.webp
 

View: https://youtube.com/shorts/xHMLAVDqKNU?si=hRHUizNwJIU1qxpx

The reputation of the Han for cheating lying stealing swindling & all manner of underhanded dealings is legendary.

But I'm glad you're subjecting the Gwailou to a taste of their own medicine. May the Han & the Gwailou cancel each other out. The world will be a safer place. @rockdog


If you type ”Indian hate” in youtube, western media‘s criticism on India and Indian are whole next level compare to China.

Let's always see the positive side for each race/ nation.

This is also the reason i already tried my best not to mention or even don't compare India with China in this thread than old forum.



View: https://x.com/Kanthan2030/status/1818671401957523744?t=pLQmdgAfXvEo_5w9fG1AvA&s=19
 
If you type ”Indian hate” in youtube, western media‘s criticism on India and Indian are whole next level compare to China.

Let's always see the positive side for each race/ nation.

This is also the reason i already tried my best not to mention or even don't compare India with China in this thread than old forum.



View: https://x.com/Kanthan2030/status/1818671401957523744?t=pLQmdgAfXvEo_5w9fG1AvA&s=19

Of course they hate India as much as China if not more which is the reason we're actually supporting you in this . You ought to read my post which you've quoted more carefully coz you'd find that post was in support of the Chinese. The Gwailou steal , the Han steal more. Where's the problem in that ?

Besides where's the question of comparing India with China in a Chinese thread ? Did you see me comparing



What's what Washington & Beijing doing to each other got to do with my response to the EU demanding EV technology from the Chinese to implement it in a third nation ? Didn't Baidu translate do its work once again or did you fail to understand my post once again ?
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top